• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

More Dawkins idiocy...

David M

Well-Known Member
You never started.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/rel...sympathise-with-Charlie-Hebdo-terrorists.html

Quarter of British Muslims sympathise with Charlie Hebdo terrorists

Some 27 per cent of British Muslims sympathise with Paris gunmen, while more than one in ten say satirical cartoons "deserve" to be attacked

BS. 27% do not sympathise with the gunmen, they have some sympathy with the motives behind the attacks. Guess what, I do as well, what they did cannot be justified but some of the motives of people who join such groups arise from legitimate grievances.
 

David M

Well-Known Member
One targets innocent civilians, the other targets military targets with civilians dying as collateral damage. Intent is the difference. Suicide target innocent, non-military targets to get more attention.

Signature strikes target innocent civilians on purpose.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
No, its a fact. The actions of the west have absolutely contributed to the rise in radical islam.

I'm sure hatred of what they don't understand or what their media has told them to believe definitely contributed, but radical islam has always existed in their own cultures.

You have to remember a muslims biggest enemy is another muslim, many muslims seek the west for safety.

And I do understand the power vacuum left when we leave, but no one realizes it was worse when we got there.

Its very dynamic the way politics are in action there, even their own.


BUT for our purpose we are dealing with the religious idealism in context.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
BS. 27% do not sympathise with the gunmen, they have some sympathy with the motives behind the attacks. Guess what, I do as well, what they did cannot be justified but some of the motives of people who join such groups arise from legitimate grievances.

Don't get hung up on numbers, I was trying to prove a point that the minority of islam is not the only problem here.

The religion can and does deserve blame here.


Imagine if all christians were YEC and lived in a more violent culture. Would you say the religion had something to do with it?

Absolutely, because moderation cannot take foothold when fanaticism and severe fundamentalism is required by all.
 

David M

Well-Known Member
Don't get hung up on numbers, I was trying to prove a point that the minority of islam is not the only problem here.

And you pretty much failed as the point was not supported by the poll. That is the problem with using quotes from a right-wing rag.

Imagine if all christians were YEC and lived in a more violent culture. Would you say the religion had something to do with it?

Absolutely, because moderation cannot take foothold when fanaticism and severe fundamentalism is required by all.

And yet, from the poll you used, 68% said that any attacks on the publishers of images of Mohamme were never justified (and 11% said that they were). Looks like moderation has more than a foothold.
 

David M

Well-Known Member
I'm sure hatred of what they don't understand or what their media has told them to believe definitely contributed, but radical islam has always existed in their own cultures.

They do understand and your claim otherwise shows that air of arogance and self-superiority that runs through so many of your posts.

No, its the torture and murder of innocent people by the western powers that has contributed. Its the invasion of territiry and the anarchic mess that is left behind that contributes. Its the long support of dictators and tyrants that contributes.

If a drone strike killed my family members I'd certainly think that the governments responsible are evil and should be fought.
 

outhouse

Atheistically

outhouse

Atheistically
That cannot be justification for the massive generalisations.


But we can recognize it as a negative aspect of theism that should be corrected.

No one gets a free ride here. They should be held accountable, because these issues had been swept under the rug for a long time to hide the embarrassment.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Guys you need to know the full thousand years of history here before throwing stones.

This is a decent article on militant Islam even if 13 years old.

http://www.meforum.org/168/at-war-with-whom

an ideology we have come to know as militant Islam, a minority outgrowth of the faith that exudes a bitter hatred for Western ideas, including capitalism, individualism, and consumerism
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Values are extremely important.

Islamists (and there are hundreds of millions of them), value supremacism, misogyny, homophobia, and anti-semitism, and they think free speech and freedom of religion are evil.

This amounts to a huge cultural clash with the west.
 

Osal

Active Member
IS executes 3,500 in Syria since declaring 'caliphate'

The number of people in the US killed through some form of gun violence is the US last year was aound 12,000 (gunviolencearchive.org).

The US is far more violent, and senslessly so, than the ISIS caliphate. That's not to say that ISIS should be excused, but if we object to what ISIS is doing, how can we turn a blind eye to violence in our own back yard? How can we take moral ground we do not deserve?

And what would we do if some other country invaded to save us from ourselves?
 
Last edited:
Top