Abortion, legal in all form, rather than in specific situations, allows an animal to have more rights than a human child.
On second thought, you deserve a better answer than I originally presented.
I think I see where you are coming from. In a nutshell, an unborn child does not deserve to die simply because the mother does not feel like giving birth.
A frequent objection, which I agree with, is that it takes a certain period of time before an embryo develops to the point of having any rights. However, it is obviously difficult to settle when and whether such a point has been reached even if one accepts the premise. And there are people who think that it is inherently wrong to purposefully pursue an abortion, perhaps because they think a birth is meant to be and/or a soul that may suffer is present as soon as the conception occurs.
In any case, even enthusiastic defenders of abortion rights will rarely if ever favor abortion over avoiding the conception in the first place. Abortions may often be better than the alternatives, but they are never pleasant.
But my main source of disagreement with your statement is that you seem to be claiming that an unborn child has it in his or her best interests to be born even if her mother would rather not.
That is not a given to me. I am just not convinced that pressuring a mother that would otherwise abort into giving birth against her own preferences is in any way respectful towards the child itself (even taking for granted that it is indeed a child as opposed to an embryo with no neural cells whatsoever and at least arguably no soul or ability to feel any kind of pain).
Being raised by one who would rather not have given birth is no blessing, and can indeed be a curse.
Instead of opposing abortions exactly, we all should strive to make them unappealling, unnecessary.
