Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I would like to join this discussion inshaAllah if you don't mind
I hope it will be a discussion based on understanding and respecting each others opinions
Of corse sister, agreed. I hope all who participate will use proper adab, and not allow their anger get ahold.
As such, if I have offended before, or do so in future, forgive me.
As for the topic of tawassul throught the Prophet Muhammad (saws) and the Awliya (saints), I will not be able to write much until I am able to get on the desktop. But I can summ it up as,
The Prophets and Awliya are physically passed, but they remain alive in the grave as we all do. They are able to, with permission of Allah (swt), to perform intercession for us. This is a position held by all four madhabs historically. It was only until ibn Abd Wahhab who denounced it (like Ibn Taymiyya) and proceded to declare takfir on all who did such, allowing for their blood to be spilt.
Now I can post more, insh'Allah soon. But till tnan, feel free to respond, or add.
I can't go into full detail, but I think it was Imam Shafi'i ra (I follow his madhab as well) who used to visit the grave of another imam (Hanefa or Malik ra)
And as someone who follows Shafi'i madhab, I must ask a side question. How can you follow Shafi'i madhab and be salafi? The founder was a hanbali and salafis don't follow any madhab strictly, as such running the risk of talfiq and mixing with what is now a practically neo-hanbali madhab.
To be honest I've never fully looked into the difference between the schools of jurisprudence, but I have been told on multiple occasions by people that listen to my opinions that I am closest to Hanafi. I'll watch this thread with interest.
I think a lot of Muslims in the UK especially the Asian community follow the hanafi madhab.
Could you post the daleel of the four madhaahib saying its permissible, when you have time.
Thing is, the salafi sheikhs will side with one madhab in say Salah, but than another in wudu. They mix the madhabs claiming one is more "authentic" than another. As for the hanbali sheikhs, they are not traditonal in the sense a Shafi'i or Hanafi scholar would be. Instead, they follow Ibn Abd Wahhabs additions to the madhab.I think it's possible to be shafi'i and salafi..it's true that mostly the scholars from Saudi Arabia are hanbali..even though many salafis think they don't follow follow a madhab most of them follow the hanbali without realizing. Following a madhab isnt against islam.. it's blind following which isn't allowed.
If you listen to sh. ibn uthaymeen in his explanations of waraqaat he says that it is permissible to follow a certain madhab as laymen. And he himself encouraged laymen to follow a madhab.
I prefer the shaafi'i madhab after reading the fiqh book abu shujaa'.
Thing is, the salafi sheikhs will side with one madhab in say Salah, but than another in wudu. They mix the madhabs claiming one is more "authentic" than another. As for the hanbali sheikhs, they are not traditonal in the sense a Shafi'i or Hanafi scholar would be. Instead, they follow Ibn Abd Wahhabs additions to the madhab.
See, he did many works in fiqh. The most in aqidah he did was push the athari aqida like Ibn Tamiyyah and Ibn Hanbal. I'd like to ask, how do you pray? According to Shafi'i madhab, or Albani?Because his books are mostly about aqeedah(creed) issues and not fiqh (jurisprudence).
Al-Mardawi in his book al-Insaf fi Ma`rifat al-Rajih min al-Khilaf `ala Madhhab al-Imam al-Mubajjal Ahmad ibn Hanbal (3:456) and Ibn Muflih in his Furu` (1:595) related that the wording preferred by Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Allah be well-pleased with him, is: �O Allah! I am turning to you with your Prophet, the Prophet of mercy. O Muhammad! I am turning with you to my Lord for the fulfillment of my need.�
Imam Ahmad and Tawassul:
المرداوي في الإنصاف ( 2:456
“… يجوز التوسل بالرجل الصالح على الصحيح من المذهب، وقيل:
يُستحب. قال الإمام أحمد للمروذي : يتوسل بالنبي صلى اله عليه وسلم في دعائه
وجزم به في المستوعب وغيره..”
Al-Mardawi said: “The correct position of the [Hanbali] madhhab is that it is permissible in one’s du`a to use as one’s means a pious person (saalih), and it is said that it is desirable (mustahabb). Imam Ahmad said to Abu Bakr al-Marwazi: ‘Let him use the Prophet as a means in his supplication to Allah.’” (Al-Insaf 2:456) This is also cited by Ibn Taymiyyah in Majmu’ Al-Fatawa (1:140).
Imam Shawkani and Tawassul:
قال الشوكاني في تحفة الذاكرين:
“وفي الحديث دليل على جواز التوسل برسول الله صلى اله عليه وسلم إلى الله عز وجل
مع اعتقاد أن الفاعل هو الله سبحانه وتعالى، وأنه المعطي والمانع ما شاء
.(10/ كان وما لم يشأ لم يكن” (تحفة الأحوذي 34
Al-Shawkani said, in Tuhfatul Dhakireen:
“And in this hadith is proof for the permissibility of tawassul through the Prophetto Allah, with the conviction that the [actual] doer is Allah, and that He is the Giver and the Withholder. What He wills is, and what He does not will, will never be.”
Al-Albani on Imam Hanbal and Imam Al-Shawkani:
الألباني في “التوسل أنواعه وأحكامه” ( 38
“…مع أنه قد قال ببعضه بعض الأئمة، فأجاز الإمام أحمد التوسل
بالرسول وحده فقط، وأجاز غيره كالإمام الشوكاني التوسل به وبغيره من
الأنبياء والصالحي
Al-Albani in ‘Al-Tawassul’: “Even though some of them have been allowed by some of the Imams, so for instance Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal allowed tawassul through the Prophet alone, and others such as Imam Al-Shawkani allowed tawassul through his [pbuh] and through others from the Prophets and the righteous.”
Imam Nawawi on Tawassul:
النووي في المجموع شرح المهذب (كتاب الحج:
ثم يرجع إلى موقفه الأول قبالة وجه رسول الله صلى اله عليه وسلم ويتوسل به في حق
نفسه، ويستشفع به إلى ربه سبحانه وتعالى
[The pilgrim] should then face the shrine of the Messenger of Allah (s) , make him an intermediary [to Allah], and intercede through him to Allah… (Majmu’ Sharh Al-Madhhab – Kitab Al-Hajj)
Imam Ibn Khuzaymah and Tawassul:
7/ ابن حجر في تهذيب التهذيب ( 339
قال (الحاكم النيسابوري وسمعت أبا بكر محمد بن المؤمل بن الحسن
بن عيسى يقول خرجنا مع امام أهل الحديث أبي بكر بن خزيمة وعديله
أبي علي الثقفي مع جماعة من مشائخنا وهم إذ ذاك متوافرون إلى زيارة
قبر علي بن موسى الرضى بطوس قال فرأيت من تعظيمه يعنى ابن خزيمة
لتلك البقعة وتواضعه لها وتضرعه عندها ما تحيرنا.
Ibn Hajar (Tahdhib 7:339) narrates the account of the Imam of Ahlul-Hadith Ibn Khuzaymah, under the entry of the same Ali bin Musa Al-Ridha. He relates that Ibn Khuzaymah also performed tawassul at the grave of Al-Ridha.
Ibn Hibban and Tawassul:
8/456/ ابن حبان في كتابه الثقات ( 14411
مات على بن موسى الرضا بطوس من شربة سقاه إياها المأمون فمات من
ساعته وذلك في يوم السبت آخر يوم سنة ثلاث ومائتين وقبره بسناباذ
خارج النوقان مشهور يزار بجنب قبر الرشيد، قد زرته مرارا كثيرة وما
حلت بي شدة في وقت مقامى بطوس فزرت قبر على بن موسى الرضا
صلوات الله على جده وعليه ودعوت الله إزالتها عنى إلا أستجيب لي
وزالت عنى تلك الشدة وهذا شيء جربته مرارا فوجدته كذلك أماتنا
الله على محبة المصطفى وأهل بيته صلى الله عليه وعليهم أجمعين.
In his Rijal book Al-Thuqat (8:456:14411), under the entry of Ali bin Musa al-Ridha, Ibn Hibban relates his own account of going to Al-Ridha’s grave, performing tawassul through him and states that whenever “I was afflicted with a problem during my stay in Tus, I would visit the grave of Ali bin Musa (Allah’s blessings be upon his grandfather and him) and ask Allah to relieve me of that problem and it (my dua) would be answered and the problem alleviated. And this is something I did, and found to work, many times …”
There are a lot salafi shayuukh who do that but they mostly call themselves 'ahlul hadeeth' (the people of hadith) meaning they look at which madhab has the strongest proof such as the authenticity of the chain of the hadith etc.
And then they take that opinion so that's why you see them for example agreeing with the shaafi'i madhab in one matter and maybe with the hanafi madhab in another etc.
And in my opinion Allahu a'lem This is permissible..but this is something only people of knowledge and ijtihaad can do.
The shayuukh who only follow the hanbali fiqh are traditional but the shaafi'i /hanafi fiqh is more precise and has a longer history alahu a'lem (Allah knows best)
I do not think those scholars follow any additions of shaykh abdulwahaab in the madhab. Because his books are mostly about aqeedah(creed) issues and not fiqh (jurisprudence).
I was under the impression that Wahabiyyah does not approve of Ijtihad.
Unattributed quote from Source“Purity of worship and reverence to God alone. The authentic carriers of Islam from the time of the Prophet (s) until now.”
Indeed, however I am a 35 year+ student of Islam. Nothing I have said has been derogatory of Islam or Muhammad. However I am critical of Wahabiyyah and especially it's use of force against other Muslims going so far as to accuse them of Shirk.