• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Multiple Gunmen open fire on 40 in Quebec Canada Mosque - Breaking Now

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
Breaking NOW - multiple gunmen start shooting at 40 people in Quebec City, Canada, mosque, reports of 5 dead, many wounded, breaking, no descriptions yet. At least 3 gunmen were observed according to initial reports.

Obviously there are witnesses but CBC and other news agencies not reporting the descriptions of the shooters.

Developing
 

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
Breaking on RT News just this minute, multiple witnesses in the mosque report the gunmen shouted Allahu Akbar as they started shooting:

QUOTE “One started shooting. As soon as he opened fire he shouted, "Allahu akbar!" ("God is great!") The bullets reached people who were praying. People who prayed lost their lives. END QUOTE

Now I do not know if that is factual they were shouting this, but if so then PM Trudeau is going to look like a real *** hole, blaming Trump along with Alt-Left blaming America for "Muslim Ban" that doesn't exist, it is a VERY temporary halt that is COUNTRY specific and not religious specfic until a proper vetting system can be established (est 14 day halt), then they blame "Canadian militias", Russians, my God even though this is all horrible in one way what a comedy of political propaganda on the level of a circus.

So maybe it wasn't Muslim shooting Muslim or Shia verse Sunni or ISIS mad at moderate Islamic Centre, God KNOWS but it is starting to look that way...

... and one of them had an AK-47? So how is Canadian gun control working out? An AK isn't even legal here where I live, but if some sect is itching to finger others fully automatic no one is going to prevent them from getting that rifle. Unless you can shoot first maybe?

shheeeezzzzz... imagine if this is true, the gunmen shouting Allahu Akbar - and I think it's probable and not "fake news" - and then... and then it is found the gunmen were "immigrants" or "refugees" that Trudeau welcomed in ... the PM may as well eat raw tuna with tape worm segments at that point.
 
Last edited:

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
Now CBC is also reporting that witnesses say gunman was shouting Allahu Akbar then shooting at little boy and adult.

So it looks like it is true...
 

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
Don't know if this has any value but those who listen in on police scanners picked up two names Bashir Al-Taweed and Hassan Matti - not clear if these two are victims or captured gunmen. But typically victim names are not mentioned on dispatch.
 

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
You can't make this stuff up folks. CNN and anti-Trump Daily Beast reported Reuters has confirmed the gunmen of the mosque attack were white supremacists. Then they had to retract this after it was soon realized that their Reuters news site they took the report from was a fake Reuters parody site, not actually Reuters.
 

wicketkeeper

Living From the Heart.
Maybe if the US stopped murdering innocent people such as in the following news report:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV5-t_1m0Vo
There are plenty of rumors going around that claim IS/ISIS/Al Qaeda are supplied weapons etc by the US, I think the UK will also be in the mix for supplying arms to people they call terrorists.

It matters not who fires the bullets or drops the bombs because they are all terrorist acts.
 

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
In regards to US giving supplies to extremists, yes, Hillary was arming the "rebels" in Libya which were actually Islamic terrorists who took those guns and weapons being run through the embassy and then attacked the embassy and then Obama and Hillary said it was because of an anti-Muslim video that the terrorists attacked and so Hillary and Obama violated the civil rights and free speech of the video maker by putting him in prison for false reasons. Obama gave huge amounts of cash to the Iranian mullahs who are now spending it on arms to kill fellow Muslims.

There is something particularly disturbing about the Canadian government lock down on this story at this juncture - it is very clear the police have probably two of the gunmen involved ...

... so they should already know the identity of the terrorists, etc.. Yet it has now been a long time and we have not heard the names or background of the gunmen captured be it one or two.

The longer this goes on, it takes on the typical pattern of previous such incidents - and increases the likelihood it is not white supremacists but Muslims, be it some internal dispute at the mosque, Sunni verse Shia, radicalized Islamic terrorism, but for political reasons they want to keep it under wraps as long as possible then if Islamic they need time to build a lone wolf narrative. Of course if it were white supremacists we would have already seen their mug shots and their names would be screaming headlines.

Can you imagine if it turns out to be Syrian refugees recently admitted into Canada?

Want to lay down odds that it is? I take two to one odds it is.

But then they will try to move on from the story as quickly as possible. Here in the US not even two weeks ago a mosque west of Seattle was set on fire. The news was amok it was white supremacists, and that the firebug was a white American. This reporting went on for 24 hours. "Islamophobia" yabba dabba doo. "White hate". Yadda yadda.Then it was found that the "white supremacist" was a homeless man with mental problems who had been worshipping at the mosque but was banned for hygiene reasons. So the guy set the mosque on fire. And there was the mosque fire in Texas in 2016, "white terrorism" narrative, then it turned out it was some black kid who was attending the mosque but felt discriminated against by non-black Muslims because he was black and so set the mosque on fire. In both cases the stories just disappeared from the news cycle immediately.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You can't make this stuff up folks. CNN and anti-Trump Daily Beast reported Reuters has confirmed the gunmen of the mosque attack were white supremacists. Then they had to retract this after it was soon realized that their Reuters news site they took the report from was a fake Reuters parody site, not actually Reuters.
TDB has admitted to the fake news.....
Ref....
6 Dead in Quebec City Mosque Shooting

When bias confirmation is so delicious, double checking the source is out the window, eh?
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Gun and Bomb attacks on Mosques have usually been one Muslim sect against another.
In this case we simply do not yet know, the who or the why. it could have been anyone.
 

4consideration

*
Premium Member

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
FOX News is reporting one of the gunmen is a Moroccan and the other a possible convert to Islam.

LINK

Suspect in Quebec mosque terror attack was of Moroccan origin, report shows

Two names now - " One of two gunmen who shouted 'Allahu akbar!' as they opened fire at a mosque in Quebec City was of Moroccan origin, a witness and local media reported Monday" ... " The terror suspects were identified as Mohamed Khadir and Alexandre Bissonnette, the Canadian TV network TVA Nouvelles reported."
 
Top