• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Multiple Gunmen open fire on 40 in Quebec Canada Mosque - Breaking Now

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
So you mean the pig head thrown at the mosque was also done by members of muslim sect?

Did I not specifically say Gun and Bomb Attacks. ?
There have of course been attacks on Mosques and Synagogues by a variety of extremists, including many arson attacks.
Of recent times Most violent attacks on Mosques have been Muslim on Muslim.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Hmmm
I wonder what could have lead to this?
If I had to guess (which I somewhat do), it is an act of fear manifesting as hatred, quite possibly spurred by a perception of the influx of Syrian immigrants as a source of social hardships in the times to come.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
If I had to guess (which I somewhat do), it is an act of fear manifesting as hatred, quite possibly spurred by a perception of the influx of Syrian immigrants as a source of social hardships in the times to come.
I'm in Ontario, not Quebec, but I haven't run into any fear or hatred of Syrian refugees here, either in the media or talking to people. The coverage tends to all be positive stories about community groups coming together to sponsor refugees or stories of concern about people left there or in refugee camps.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Still a lot of unknowns here. Why do you suppose that Muslims would do this (if this turns out to be the case)? Conflict between differing Muslim sects is not common in North America is it? There is a lot that doesn't make sense at this point.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Still a lot of unknowns here. Why do you suppose that Muslims would do this (if this turns out to be the case)? Conflict between differing Muslim sects is not common in North America is it? There is a lot that doesn't make sense at this point.

I think that is just luck of the draw.
In the UK, Yobs do sometime try to fire Mosques.
But most of the trouble and nearly all the killing has been between sects.
I suspect America will catch up in this as the population percentage between the various sects grow.
There are surprisingly few attacks on white Christians, though some very notable ones.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Why do you suppose that Muslims would do this (if this turns out to be the case)?
For the same reasons that they usually do?
The vast majority of innocent Muslim victims of terrorists are killed by Muslims. This is a fact. Islamicists have killed more Muslims than the armies of the USA and Israel put together.

Tom
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Still a lot of unknowns here. Why do you suppose that Muslims would do this (if this turns out to be the case)? Conflict between differing Muslim sects is not common in North America is it? There is a lot that doesn't make sense at this point.
I am at the other side of the Americas, but I have learned of inter-Muslim violence in these parts.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
FOX News is reporting one of the gunmen is a Moroccan and the other a possible convert to Islam.

LINK

Suspect in Quebec mosque terror attack was of Moroccan origin, report shows

Two names now - " One of two gunmen who shouted 'Allahu akbar!' as they opened fire at a mosque in Quebec City was of Moroccan origin, a witness and local media reported Monday" ... " The terror suspects were identified as Mohamed Khadir and Alexandre Bissonnette, the Canadian TV network TVA Nouvelles reported."
CBC is confirming the names of the suspects now. No word from police yet on possible motives.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
The suspect is to be arraigned this afternoon, and an RCMP (or police) report will be forthcoming. It is best, on all sides to take a 'wait and see' attitude before jumping to conclusions of any kind. Still. Maybe even hold opinions until trial time.
 

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
The Canadian government is involved in the police accounts, frankly this is all looking more and more like trying to construct a false narrative not much far removed from the false narrative of "hands up, don't shoot".

They did not release any information for a long time, I believe they were trying to build a "lone wolf" argument.

Now they are saying that the first suspect Mohamed Khadir is not Mohamed Khadir but Mohammed Belkhadir who is now being called a "witness" not a suspect.

They are dismissing multiple accounts of witnesses saying there were two involved in the shooting. And that they were yelling Allahu Akbar is now not part of the new narrative despite witnesses swearing to the fact. They are now saying Bissonnette is the only gunman.

Then we have leftists and members of a pro-Muslim immigration leftwing group saying Bissonnette "liked Trump" (hit the like button) but that is not clear but on his Facebook he did "like" Canadian politician Jack Layton, who was a leader of the left-wing NDP, so the likes do not shed much light on Bissonnette’s beliefs which of course the left will try to spin and leave out facts.

But there are reports now that Bissonnette and Belkhadir were students at Universite Laval, Charles D’Amboise, per Radio-Canada as reported.

Now I am seeing reports that Bissonnette and Belkhadir were involved in a homosexual relation that was suspected by the mosque and objected to.

No way is this story is complete. And I think the Canadian government is trying to use some sort of deflection. I absolutely do not put such deflection as above those involved from the current regime.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
The right wing is, as usual, trying to twist this into something it's is not by using at best suspect sources or not sources at all. I've been reading that indeed he's a pro-Trump pro-right wing terrorist but I'll reserve final judgement until all the facts are known.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The right wing is, as usual, trying to twist this into something it's is not by using at best suspect sources or not sources at all. I've been reading that indeed he's a pro-Trump pro-right wing terrorist but I'll reserve final judgement until all the facts are known.
Only the right?
A leftish source has already falsely claimed it was white supremacists.
You should accept that people on all sides can be dirt....except for Libertarians....we're all saints.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Only the right?
A leftish source has already falsely claimed it was white supremacists.
You should accept that people on all sides can be dirt....except for Libertarians....we're all saints.
Falsely. Hardly falsely. And, of course, unlike others, I wrote that I was reserving judgement which, of course, right wing types don't bother with - preferring to assume that their positions are true and refuse to budge let alone reserve judgement.
 
Top