godnotgod
Thou art That
I didn't "interpret" anything; I just posted what he actually said, which is that "the universe is an inseparable web".
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Multiverse theory and god(s).
- Thread starter Father Heathen
- Start date
I didn't "interpret" anything; I just posted what he actually said, which is that "the universe is an inseparable web".
Where did he say or write this?
godnotgod
Thou art That
Good luck! You might try asking him. He's usually pretty good with answering correspondence (or at least I've found him to be so). Just a thought.
godnotgod
Thou art That
ukok102nak
Active Member
~;> multiverse are real
as real as the antimatter itself
:read:
Every particle has an antiparticle with the same mass but the opposite electric charge. The proton has the negatively charged antiproton; the electron has the positively charged anti-electron, or positron.
The possibility of antimatter first surfaced in equations formulated by British theoretical physicist Paul Dirac in 1928 - four years before American experimenter Carl Anderson found positrons in cosmic rays.
Notoriously, matter and antimatter destroy each other, or annihilate, whenever they come into contact. An electron and a positron mutually destruct in a puff of light consisting of two photons sent out in precisely opposite directions, each with an energy corresponding exactly to the mass of the electron (and positron).
Neutral particles can have antiparticles, too. The neutron might have no charge, but quarks - the smaller particles that make it up - do. Turn these quarks into antiquarks by flipping their charges, and you've made an antineutron.
At the moment physicists are having enough difficulty just taming antihydrogen, the simplest possible anti-atom. Can we ever expect them to make a whole anti-periodic table?
Gravity works the same way on all matter – but what about antimatter? If it behaves differently, it could overturn our understanding of physics
:ty:
godbless unto all always
as real as the antimatter itself
:read:
Every particle has an antiparticle with the same mass but the opposite electric charge. The proton has the negatively charged antiproton; the electron has the positively charged anti-electron, or positron.
The possibility of antimatter first surfaced in equations formulated by British theoretical physicist Paul Dirac in 1928 - four years before American experimenter Carl Anderson found positrons in cosmic rays.
Notoriously, matter and antimatter destroy each other, or annihilate, whenever they come into contact. An electron and a positron mutually destruct in a puff of light consisting of two photons sent out in precisely opposite directions, each with an energy corresponding exactly to the mass of the electron (and positron).
Neutral particles can have antiparticles, too. The neutron might have no charge, but quarks - the smaller particles that make it up - do. Turn these quarks into antiquarks by flipping their charges, and you've made an antineutron.
At the moment physicists are having enough difficulty just taming antihydrogen, the simplest possible anti-atom. Can we ever expect them to make a whole anti-periodic table?
Gravity works the same way on all matter – but what about antimatter? If it behaves differently, it could overturn our understanding of physics
:ty:
godbless unto all always
godnotgod
Thou art That
Well, no luck with my inquiries, either from Davies or the site I sourced it from, which is:
http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1413958
I am going to provisionally accept the quote as authentic. If you wish to pursue it, please, by all means, especially since you have a more personal contact with Davies.
However, beyond that, I will say that it is obvious to me that the Universe is totally interconnected as a single entity. If there is some doubt in your mind, where do you suppose any discontinuity can possibly exist?
Last edited:
Brian Schuh
Well-Known Member
Well, that would explain free will. For if there is a multiverse and there is a universe for every one of my potential choices, then there is a universe where I commit the sin I am tempted to commit and there is a universe where I withstand the temptation. That is a lot of universes. So I guess there is a universe where I am going to heaven and a lot of universes where I am destined for hell. So much for free will. There is a universe with me in it for every choice I ever made, like a universe where I go to business school and a universe where I take Liberal Arts. Etc. Etc.
Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
I'd agree. This ephemeral parallel reality we are tapping into right now with our computers- proves in principle that such 'supernatural' things can exist. I don't see why the creator of the entire universe would be restricted from the same thing!
We would have considered such a thing utterly impossible not so long ago i.e. we cannot possibly determine the existence of something beyond our comprehension, by trying to comprehend it, the greater predictor is simply the will of the creator to make it so.
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
I fail entirely to see what multi-verses would have to do with gods. Why mix theoretical physics with religious woo?
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Thanks for informing us of your shortcomings. It was a fine contribution to the thread.
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
Thank you for your snarky reply. Why don't you enlighten me
Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
Last edited:
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
I don't understand what's hard to grasp. Multiverse theory suggests infinite universes, which means all possibilities would occur. So the question (which was basically just seeking peoples speculation/opinions on what they think is or could be) is could an entity that we would consider "god" be a possibility that exists in some universes, a necessity in all, or an impossibility in none. Also, if god occurs, would it be variants that are exclusive to their specific, individual universes, or a single entity that traverses all realities.
bubbleguppy
Serial Forum Observer
In my own humble uneducated opinion, I would believe that if the multiverse theory is correct, there would be both universes with gods as well as universes without gods. But who's to say? I mean, my opinion should be taken with a grain of salt at least.
VioletVortex
Well-Known Member
I doubt the multimeter theory.
I think spiritual energy exists on a plane out of phase with the physical universe, but these overlap and have an effect on each other. It's not a separate dimension, but it's a plane that is ever so slightly off from this one; it is effectively the same plane of existence but technically not. Sorry if that seems kind of convoluted.
I think spiritual energy exists on a plane out of phase with the physical universe, but these overlap and have an effect on each other. It's not a separate dimension, but it's a plane that is ever so slightly off from this one; it is effectively the same plane of existence but technically not. Sorry if that seems kind of convoluted.
MrMrdevincamus
Voice Of The Martyrs Supporter
How would it be possible to have a universe with an omnipresent God and others without?
MrMrdevincamus
Voice Of The Martyrs Supporter
MrMrdevincamus
Voice Of The Martyrs Supporter
In physics that (your comment) is an idea put forth. In fact the parallel universes (parallel to our own) gravity effects one another. This gravitational effect recently discovered is the only empirical, or maybe its observational evidence to support the theory. Also those universes are micro quantum tiny and are plank units close to our universe, as well as billions of light years away.