• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Mum Demands School BANS Sleeping Beauty Because She 'Didn't Consent to Being Kissed'"

Skwim

Veteran Member
A MOTHER has asked her son’s school to take ‘Sleeping Beauty’ off the curriculum for its "inappropriate sexual" message.


sleeping-beauty-883336.jpg

Mother-of-two Sarah Hall, from Northumberland Park, says the fairytale promotes unacceptable behaviour which should not be read to young children.

She argued it teaches children that it is ok to kiss a woman while she’s asleep, which she says is not acceptable.

Ms Hall was reading a school book with her son, Ben, six, which was based on the traditional story.

She said: “I think it’s a specific issue in the Sleeping Beauty story about sexual behaviour and consent.

“It’s about saying is this still relevant, is it appropriate?”

She said she is worried about what message the tale, which features a Prince waking up a Princess by kissing her, sends to impressionable youngsters.

The 40-year-old left a comment in her son’s record book, and contacted the school to ask if books featuring it could be taken out of circulation for younger classes.

She said: “In today’s society, it isn’t appropriate - my son is only six, he absorbs everything he sees, and it isn’t as if I can turn it into a constructive conversation.
source

All of which is nothing like the original, thank god---or whomever. ;)

"In the original sleeping beauty, the lovely princess is put to sleep when she pricks her finger on a spindle. She sleeps for one hundred years when a prince finally arrives, kisses her, and awakens her. They fall in love, marry, and (surprise surprise) live happily ever after. But alas, the original tale is not so sweet (in fact, you have to read this to believe it.) In the original, the young woman is put to sleep because of a prophesy, rather than a curse. And it isn’t the kiss of a prince which wakes her up: the king seeing her asleep, and rather fancying having a bit, rapes her. After nine months she gives birth to two children (while she is still asleep). One of the children sucks her finger which removes the piece of flax which was keeping her asleep. She wakes up to find herself raped and the mother of two kids."
source

.


 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
This just proves that anything can be taken to excess. Maybe we need to ban Pooh because he likes honey. And the Cookie Monster clearly sends the wrong message as well.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
This just proves that anything can be taken to excess. Maybe we need to ban Pooh because he likes honey. And the Cookie Monster clearly sends the wrong message as well.
I think we need to consider banning everything. Life would be so much simpler if everything was forbidden.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
I think we need to consider banning everything. Life would be so much simpler if everything was forbidden.

Can you imagine though! No more problematic critical thinking skills involved! Just obey the group think and everything will be ok! Assimilate or be destroyed! Resistance is futile!
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Why not?
Perhaps it should be near the top!
But RF provides so much distraction and entertainment. We can all flail away with the assurance that we're right and all those who disagree are unfortunates who refuse our sage counsel.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
How hard is it to say to your kid, hey this is make believe you shouldn't do this in real life?
Lazy parenting much?
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
And that was the problem? What about those 7 very strange little men doting on her. Now that's weird.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
And that was the problem? What about those 7 very strange little men doting on her. Now that's weird.
That's Snow White.
Sleeping Beauty is the one with the lady who poisoned the heroine because she was snubbed an invite to a baby shower.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Thanks. Not up on my Disney. All of it was rather strange I thought.
Personally I was always a bit creeped out by Snow White's singing voice lol.
Although I think their version of Sleeping Beauty (itself actually based on the ballet version) is rather interesting. I mean the main characters are basically the three fairies and Maleficent. It's a very feminist sort of movie if viewed in that light.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
A MOTHER has asked her son’s school to take ‘Sleeping Beauty’ off the curriculum for its "inappropriate sexual" message.

sleeping-beauty-883336.jpg
Mother-of-two Sarah Hall, from Northumberland Park, says the fairytale promotes unacceptable behaviour which should not be read to young children.

She argued it teaches children that it is ok to kiss a woman while she’s asleep, which she says is not acceptable.

Ms Hall was reading a school book with her son, Ben, six, which was based on the traditional story.

She said: “I think it’s a specific issue in the Sleeping Beauty story about sexual behaviour and consent.

“It’s about saying is this still relevant, is it appropriate?”

She said she is worried about what message the tale, which features a Prince waking up a Princess by kissing her, sends to impressionable youngsters.

The 40-year-old left a comment in her son’s record book, and contacted the school to ask if books featuring it could be taken out of circulation for younger classes.

She said: “In today’s society, it isn’t appropriate - my son is only six, he absorbs everything he sees, and it isn’t as if I can turn it into a constructive conversation.
source
All of which is nothing like the original, thank god---or whomever. ;)

"In the original sleeping beauty, the lovely princess is put to sleep when she pricks her finger on a spindle. She sleeps for one hundred years when a prince finally arrives, kisses her, and awakens her. They fall in love, marry, and (surprise surprise) live happily ever after. But alas, the original tale is not so sweet (in fact, you have to read this to believe it.) In the original, the young woman is put to sleep because of a prophesy, rather than a curse. And it isn’t the kiss of a prince which wakes her up: the king seeing her asleep, and rather fancying having a bit, rapes her. After nine months she gives birth to two children (while she is still asleep). One of the children sucks her finger which removes the piece of flax which was keeping her asleep. She wakes up to find herself raped and the mother of two kids."
source

.


Well the original was changed as sensibilities advanced. Why not now. I agree with the mom on this.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
If a child can't tell the differences between fairytale and reality, blame the parents.
And down the line throughout the generations.

Well the original was changed as sensibilities advanced. Why not now. I agree with the mom on this.
It's clear we are so much more refined and sensitive these days to things like this.

Whoo boy.......

Life in the New Renaissance.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Well the original was changed as sensibilities advanced. Why not now. I agree with the mom on this.
I'm not so sure. Probably moreso Disney's influence than anything else. It may have something to do with where you live though.

I went through a Fairytale/Myth phase and have quite a few (readily available) editions of various fairytales. Many kid friendly editions have the originals fully intact. Very nicely illustrated even. The originals always have nicer more elaborate editions than the sanitized versions though. Hell many modern children's retellings are sometimes just as gruesome. Although that's usually irreverent Aussie/British authors ostensibly inspired by older authors like Roald Dahl.

I'm all for selecting what material to show one's own offspring. But I am sick of sanitizing things for kids in general. Let them experience the highs and lows of being a human, let them experience negative emotions once in a while. Otherwise how the hell are they going to learn healthy coping strategies?
This new age weird sappiness of trying to erase everything even remotely upsetting I don't think takes into proper account childhood development.
Also what 6 year old reads sleeping beauty and then thinks that kissing a sleeping girl is appropriate? I mean yeah, if that is a concern just I dunno, treat the child like they're a thinking person and explain that it's a very specific circumstance that is unrealistic.
What's next? Banning Alice in Wonderland because the Queen chops everyone's heads off?
How about banning Robin Hood because it teaches children to be thieves and rebel against (unjust) authority?
Winnie the Pooh because it encourages overeating?
Wind in the Willows because it encourages kids to escape from jail?
I could go on forever.
 
Last edited:
Top