Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I survived a childhood filled with Road Runner demolishing Coyote, Bugs Bunny singing arias as he dispatched those who would off him, Grimm fairy tales full of darkness and suffering and the like. And I turned out fine except, of course, for liking predators and gingerbread.I'm not so sure. Probably moreso Disney's influence than anything else. It may have something to do with where you live though.
I went through a Fairytale/Myth phase and have quite a few (readily available) editions of various fairytales. Many kid friendly editions have the originals fully intact. Very nicely illustrated even. The originals always have nicer more elaborate editions than the sanitized versions though. Hell many modern children's retellings are sometimes just as gruesome. Although that's usually irreverent Aussie/British authors ostensibly inspired by older authors like Roald Dahl.
I'm all for selecting what material to show one's own offspring. But I am sick of sanitizing things for kids in general. Let them experience the highs and lows of being a human, let them experience negative emotions once in a while. Otherwise how the hell are they going to learn healthy coping strategies?
This new age weird sappiness of trying to erase everything even remotely upsetting I don't think takes into proper account childhood development.
Also what 6 year old reads sleeping beauty and then thinks that kissing a sleeping girl is appropriate? I mean yeah, if that is a concern just I dunno, treat the child like they're a thinking person and explain that it's a very specific circumstance that is unrealistic.
What's next? Banning Alice in Wonderland because the Queen chops everyone's heads off?
How about banning Robin Hood because it teaches children to be thieves and rebel against (unjust) authority?
Winnie the Pooh because it encourages overeating?
Wind in the Willows because it encourages kids to escape from jail?
I could go on forever.
This just proves that anything can be taken to excess. Maybe we need to ban Pooh because he likes honey. And the Cookie Monster clearly sends the wrong message as well.
Well the original was changed as sensibilities advanced. Why not now. I agree with the mom on this.
I am pretty sure rebelling against unjust authority is a good moral lesson. The point here is overall, the fairy tales specifically (unlike, say Aesop's fables) provide a rather unflattering narrative for young girls to emulate (passive and vulnerable damsels in distress waiting to be rescued by prince charming). Though there is no need establish bans in schools or anything. Maybe greater prominence to Alice in Wonderland, Jungle Book and more such tales?I'm not so sure. Probably moreso Disney's influence than anything else. It may have something to do with where you live though.
I went through a Fairytale/Myth phase and have quite a few (readily available) editions of various fairytales. Many kid friendly editions have the originals fully intact. Very nicely illustrated even. The originals always have nicer more elaborate editions than the sanitized versions though. Hell many modern children's retellings are sometimes just as gruesome. Although that's usually irreverent Aussie/British authors ostensibly inspired by older authors like Roald Dahl.
I'm all for selecting what material to show one's own offspring. But I am sick of sanitizing things for kids in general. Let them experience the highs and lows of being a human, let them experience negative emotions once in a while. Otherwise how the hell are they going to learn healthy coping strategies?
This new age weird sappiness of trying to erase everything even remotely upsetting I don't think takes into proper account childhood development.
Also what 6 year old reads sleeping beauty and then thinks that kissing a sleeping girl is appropriate? I mean yeah, if that is a concern just I dunno, treat the child like they're a thinking person and explain that it's a very specific circumstance that is unrealistic.
What's next? Banning Alice in Wonderland because the Queen chops everyone's heads off?
How about banning Robin Hood because it teaches children to be thieves and rebel against (unjust) authority?
Winnie the Pooh because it encourages overeating?
Wind in the Willows because it encourages kids to escape from jail?
I could go on forever.
Jungle Book
Alice in Wonderland
And antiscience. There's no orangutans in India. Psh.Then they'll be accused of promoting colonialism and white supremacy.
Aesops are kind of boring, violent and brutal but boring nonetheless. Which is a far more serious crime IMO. And Sleeping Beauty is not the only fairy tale in existence.I am pretty sure rebelling against unjust authority is a good moral lesson. The point here is overall, the fairy tales specifically (unlike, say Aesop's fables) provide a rather unflattering narrative for young girls to emulate (passive and vulnerable damsels in distress waiting to be rescued by prince charming). Though there is no need establish bans in schools or anything. Maybe greater prominence to Alice in Wonderland, Jungle Book and more such tales?
Mine was shaped by Roald Dahl, Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids, the looney tunes, all the original fairytales from Grimm to Perrault and even folklore from my own culture. Tales of epic graphic battles and giant monsters being beaten up.I survived a childhood filled with Road Runner demolishing Coyote, Bugs Bunny singing arias as he dispatched those who would off him, Grimm fairy tales full of darkness and suffering and the like. And I turned out fine except, of course, for liking predators and gingerbread.
Probably best not to touch Briar Rabbit and the Tar Baby. .. .Then they'll be accused of promoting colonialism and white supremacy.
Drug addled 7 year old wanders off and spends time with a mentally unstable man while trying to avoid being decapitated by a bloodthirsty tyrant and consuming more drugs.
Clearly my memory regarding fairy tales is failing me. Thus I retract everything I have said in the past in this thread and promise to keep mum regarding fairy tales from now on.Aesops are kind of boring, violent and brutal but boring nonetheless. Which is a far more serious crime IMO. And Sleeping Beauty is not the only fairy tale in existence.
The original little mermaid is very proactive as a character, has agency and all that.
Belle is pretty proactive as a character. The Snow Queen has a girl (Gerda) literally saving the boy (Kai) and even the Queen herself is rather proactive, if a bit morally ambiguous.
Disney has made several fortunes with strong gutsy female role models for decade upon decade.
Even Snow White isn't that bad of a character, if you look at her. A bit bland sure, but she has some authority and spunk to her.
All narratives are important as long as there is balance. Some girls are naturally passive and it's okay to have role models that reflect their personality types as well as strong ****** female heroines. Which ironically are being seen as more and more boring the more they over saturate the market.
And Alice is pretty passive as a character, IMO. But that's okay because?
Personally I don't think anything should be banned I'm just saying, one has to be weary of the thought police constantly trying to take away literature.
I went through a Fairytale/Myth phase and have quite a few (readily available) editions of various fairytales. Many kid friendly editions have the originals fully intact. Very nicely illustrated even.
I was taken with the simple morality of the little girl who coming out the baker's drops a loaf of bread in a mud puddle. The beggar boy says, 'Now it's spoiled, do you mind if I have it?' The girl says, 'What? You?' and treads on the loaf.I survived a childhood filled with Road Runner demolishing Coyote, Bugs Bunny singing arias as he dispatched those who would off him, Grimm fairy tales full of darkness and suffering and the like. And I turned out fine except, of course, for liking predators and gingerbread.
Psst:This just proves that anything can be taken to excess. Maybe we need to ban Pooh because he likes honey. And the Cookie Monster clearly sends the wrong message as well.
Hey I think that is the story that the Pieman episode of Grizzly Tales was based off of (or it was a German Fairy Tale with the same premise, don't know.) Same deal, but instead the "Pie Man" cuts the kid's thumbs off and uses them to hold up the crust of his pies.Struwwelpeter is pretty dark. Little kid gets his thumbs cut off by a psycho with giant scissors because he won't stop sucking them. Mum tells him he deserved it.
I think because I still read (and collect) them regularly my memory is a tad more clear by default. So don't be too hard on yourself.Clearly my memory regarding fairy tales is failing me. Thus I retract everything I have said in the past in this thread and promise to keep mum regarding fairy tales from now on.
All of which is nothing like the original, thank god---or whomever.A MOTHER has asked her son’s school to take ‘Sleeping Beauty’ off the curriculum for its "inappropriate sexual" message.
Mother-of-two Sarah Hall, from Northumberland Park, says the fairytale promotes unacceptable behaviour which should not be read to young children.
She argued it teaches children that it is ok to kiss a woman while she’s asleep, which she says is not acceptable.
Ms Hall was reading a school book with her son, Ben, six, which was based on the traditional story.
She said: “I think it’s a specific issue in the Sleeping Beauty story about sexual behaviour and consent.
“It’s about saying is this still relevant, is it appropriate?”
She said she is worried about what message the tale, which features a Prince waking up a Princess by kissing her, sends to impressionable youngsters.
The 40-year-old left a comment in her son’s record book, and contacted the school to ask if books featuring it could be taken out of circulation for younger classes.
She said: “In today’s society, it isn’t appropriate - my son is only six, he absorbs everything he sees, and it isn’t as if I can turn it into a constructive conversation.
source
"In the original sleeping beauty, the lovely princess is put to sleep when she pricks her finger on a spindle. She sleeps for one hundred years when a prince finally arrives, kisses her, and awakens her. They fall in love, marry, and (surprise surprise) live happily ever after. But alas, the original tale is not so sweet (in fact, you have to read this to believe it.) In the original, the young woman is put to sleep because of a prophesy, rather than a curse. And it isn’t the kiss of a prince which wakes her up: the king seeing her asleep, and rather fancying having a bit, rapes her. After nine months she gives birth to two children (while she is still asleep). One of the children sucks her finger which removes the piece of flax which was keeping her asleep. She wakes up to find herself raped and the mother of two kids."
source