• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muslims all 101 contradictions of bible from shabbir ali has been debunked online do your research and dont parrot it to us again.

Muslims all the 101 contradictions so called, in bible from shabbir ali has been debunked online by various christian websites do your research and dont like blind followers of him parrot those nonsense again to us. understood.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
Muslims all the 101 contradictions so called, in bible from shabbir ali has been debunked online by various christian websites do your research and dont like blind followers of him parrot those nonsense again to us. understood.
Old News. Also, it's not "debunked" whatsoever. It's just answered with so much of jumping through so many hoops it's mental.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Muslims all the 101 contradictions so called, in bible from shabbir ali has been debunked online by various christian websites do your research and dont like blind followers of him parrot those nonsense again to us. understood.
I seriously doubt it. But I also doubt it very strongly when Muslims try to claim that the contradictions in their holy book have been refuted.

Do you seriously believe that there are no serious contradictions in the Bible?
 

McBell

Unbound
I seriously doubt it. But I also doubt it very strongly when Muslims try to claim that the contradictions in their holy book have been refuted.
Same for me.
Though there are times when watching apologetics go at one another is entertaining...

Do you seriously believe that there are no serious contradictions in the Bible?
I know a few people who do.
They basically take one specific version of the Bible and then compare everything else to that one specific version.
Some even take it so far as to say if the original scrolls are different than their favorite version that the originals are wrong.

King James Onlyists are known for this.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Muslims all the 101 contradictions so called, in bible from shabbir ali has been debunked online by various christian websites do your research and dont like blind followers of him parrot those nonsense again to us. understood.
Could you please tell us about one of the 101 contradictions, together with your debunk if it?

That would be interesting.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
Do you seriously believe that there are no serious contradictions in the Bible?
I think so. Atheists have not been able to show any real contradiction, only poor interpretations ans straw man arguments. Makes one think Bible must really be true, if even atheists can't revoke it.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I think so. Atheists have not been able to show any real contradiction, only poor interpretations ans straw man arguments. Makes one think Bible must really be true, if even atheists can't revoke it.
I can. You simple pretend that it does not exist. You cannot deal with the fact that Luke and Matthew differ in the year of the birth of Jesus by at least ten years.

Here is the thing, denial of a fact does not make it go away. The Ostrich Defense does not work in real life.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
No good reason to think so.
There is if you read and understand your Bible. Herod the Great died in 4 BCE. The Census of Quirinius (the one that Luke based his myth on) occurred in 6 CE. That was ten years earlier. And it could not have been earlier than that for a host of reasons. The first one being that Judea was not part of the Roman Empire and was not taxed before 6 CE. That was when Rome took over and had to hold a census. In fact according to Jewish law a census was illegal since the time of the failed census by David. You should read your Bible some day.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
There is if you read and understand your Bible. Herod the Great died in 4 BCE. The Census of Quirinius (the one that Luke based his myth on) occurred in 6 CE. That was ten years earlier. And it could not have been earlier than that for a host of reasons. The first one being that Judea was not part of the Roman Empire and was not taxed before 6 CE. That was when Rome took over and had to hold a census. In fact according to Jewish law a census was illegal since the time of the failed census by David. You should read your Bible some day.
And Bible gives those numbers? I don't think so. It is possible that those dates are not correct.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
And Bible gives those numbers? I don't think so. It is possible that those dates are not correct.
No, we can get those dates from history. If you were a student of the Bible you would also understand why there was no census in Judea for a very very long time. You cannot claim that the Bible is "historical" when history tells us of its errors.
 

1213

Well-Known Member
No, we can get those dates from history. If you were a student of the Bible you would also understand why there was no census in Judea for a very very long time. You cannot claim that the Bible is "historical" when history tells us of its errors.
Why do you think "history" can't be erroneous?
 

1213

Well-Known Member
Why do you think the Bible can't be erroneous?
Why do you think I have not thought so. I think Bible could be erroneous. That is why i asked atheists to show an error in it. Till this day best that atheists have been able to do is to show small translation errors in some translations, which doesn't actually make the original text erroneous.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Why do you think "history" can't be erroneous?

It can be, but when various independent sources tell you the same thing it is very unlikely to be wrong.

Now why would anyone think that the Bible cannot be wrong? The Bible does not even make that silly mistake. That is due to misinterpretations of the Bible by the ignorant. And sometimes dishonest.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Why do you think I have not thought so. I think Bible could be erroneous. That is why i asked atheists to show an error in it. Till this day best that atheists have been able to do is to show small translation errors in some translations, which doesn't actually make the original text erroneous.
That is not true at all. Of course you should not claim that people that find errors in the Bible are atheists. Many of them are Christians too. And practically all of Genesis and Exodus have been shown to be wrong. And you still cannot deal with the ten year difference in the dates of birth of Jesus in Luke and Matthew. No Christian can explain that.
 

Maninthemiddle

Active Member
How is it even possible to assert that the Bible is devoid of contradictions, historical inaccuracies, and scientific errors with a straight face? Embracing such a notion would require a significant suspension of common sense and logic.
 
Top