Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What is the relationship between Muslims and the theory of evolution?
Do a lot of Muslims agree that humans evolved from other animals, or do most Muslims not accept this concept?
What are your personal views on evolution (Muslims only)?
What is the relationship between Muslims and the theory of evolution?
Do a lot of Muslims agree that humans evolved from other animals, or do most Muslims not accept this concept?
What are your personal views on evolution (Muslims only)?
What I found to be indefensible is trying to use the theory to disprove the theory of creationism as TOE doesn't explain that much about the origin of life.
I believe that both could work consistently together, though, I don't deny that it is a probable for it to replace or refute the claim of creationism. However, I find it illogical to claim that it is a fact that the TOE is currently able to wipe off the idea of creationism.
That is what I think too, evolution regarding, hypertrophy,( more usage of organs leading to more strength and sustenance) and atrophy ( diminished size of organs due to lack of usage, i.e less number of teeth in the subsequent populations, ) seems to have occured in the human race. But according to the basic rule of survival of the fittest, if man did evolve from chimps, chimps shouldn't have been here spontaneously, or should have been really genetically deformed, unfit for survival, and not enjoying themselves as an entirely distinctive species, nurturing perfectly on its own. And if evolution is a continuous natural process, like all other processes of the human body, which go through continuous regeneration and repair, it still should be happening, and it does not. All human biology is based on the intrinsic system of repair and regeneration untill it reaches an equilibrium, the process still go on,till we die, without reaching a mutation, unless we have a nuclear bomb exposure, biologically degenerative and catastrophic chemicals instilled in our artificial environments.( pollution, smoke, radiation etc)I believe that human beings evolved but not from animals, we evolved from an early form of human beings who had different body shapes, taller, bigger, etc. Animals are animals and human beings are human beings.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/science/08cnd-fossil.htmlScientists who dated and analyzed the specimens — a 1.44 million-year-old Homo habilis and a 1.55 million-year-old Homo erectus — said their findings challenged the conventional view that these species evolved one after the other. Instead, they apparently lived side by side in eastern Africa for almost half a million years.
Well, I can't say that the evolution is completely null, I look at it like any other scientific theory that is exposed to further modification as more evidences are discovered. What I found to be indefensible is trying to use the theory to disprove the theory of creationism as TOE doesn't explain that much about the origin of life. I believe that both could work consistently together, though, I don't deny that it is a probable for it to replace or refute the claim of creationism. However, I find it illogical to claim that it is a fact that the TOE is currently able to wipe off the idea of creationism.