Drax
Independent
I am a Globalist, meaning I desire a centralized world government.
1) I support population reduction (non-racial eugenics, soft and hard kill)
a. Non-Racial Eugenics - Processes like sterilization of those deemed unfit to bare offspring due to hereditary illnesses or mutations which could be potentially passed on to offspring and would weaken the genetic stock. One/two child policies would also fall under this category.
b. Soft Kill - Methods of reducing population numbers which occur slowly and over a given period of time. Diseases like Cancer would (if purposely generated) be defined as a soft kill. Another soft kill would be tainting food/water supplies with various toxins - producing sickness in the strong and death in the weak. It also tends to decrease the overall longevity of a population, causing a greater need for pharmaceuticals, hospital stays and dependency on the government for vaccines (where applicable).
c. Hard Kill - A virus like Ebola would be (if purposely generated) effective at reducing large numbers of population quickly. Generally hard kill refers to rapid methods of population reduction and can include genocide. Another example of a hard kill would be a world-wide pandemic of which recovery was minimal.
2) I support gun control.
a. Gun control does not take away the arms of those who have registered them. It prevents those who would misuse them or who cannot properly use them from owning them in the first place. It does not prevent those who have their minds set on committing crime with guns (IE: black market guns) from committing crime.
3) I support a merit/plutocracy
a. Rule by merit and rule by money - This is a basic understanding merit/plutocracy. If a citizen has merit and money, he is fit to hold office. If a citizen has merit and little money, he is fit to hold office. If a citizen has extreme wealth and no merit, he is unfit to hold office. If a citizen has no wealth and no merit, he is unfit to hold office.
b. Merit permits purchased crime but requires wealth - If a citizen has a high degree of wealth and merit, he may opt to purchase crime. This means he may PURCHASE the temporary right to break the law. If he desires to kill someone he despises, he may purchase that temporary right and do so. The concept is like creating a license to be independent of legal prosecution for a period of time. The fee to produce this crime-license is high and cannot be purchased by those who do not have a given level of accepted merit. Also, the type of crime-license depends on the amount of merit.
If the citizen has little wealth, obviously he cannot purchase a license. If a citizen who has enough merit but not enough wealth breaks into a house or steals money, his merit is reduced (he cannot purchase a license).
Licenses do not extend to all crimes regardless of how much wealth or merit is involved (Limited Licenses). Murdering political figures, bombing a country (etc) are not acceptable as reasons for a license.
c. The amount of merit decides the State-provided conditions of living - If a citizen has greater merit without great wealth, he shall be given more than the basic needs of life by the State. (The State gives to every citizen plus [blank] starting merit [at birth] and this increases as the citizen earns and serves the community).
d. Tax exemption and tax breaks for merit, not money - Those who have high merit are given a decreased rate or tax or in rare situations do not have to pay tax (if their corporation follows all legislation and employs 'X' number of citizens in stable working conditions) (if they serve the community in a major way) (if they are 'heros' [those who have preserved the stability of government, those who have went beyond common acts of heroism to prevent/stop disruption/terrorism).
e. Flat tax - No citizen (with the exception of reasons of merit) will pay any more than any other citizen (wealthy or unwealthy). If merit is in the negative zone, tax may or may not be increased depending on the general wealth level of the citizen.
4) I support A Open Palm/Closed Fist Dynamic Government.
a. The government should in times of war be as a 'closed fist' (unwavering, unwilling to compromise and unwilling to even hear thoughts of 'democracy' or protest from the citizens under it). In 'open palm' (times of peace/minimal conflict), the government should be yielding to the wishes of citizens and non-tyrannical. Protest and democratic systems under moderation are to be permitted. (Reason: The world is dynamic [ever changing] thus the government should also be).
5) I support war, not peace.
a. In war, civilization grows. The victor learns or falls, as does the conquered. In peace, there is no conflict thus no real growth. However, war should be broken by momentary peace (dynamic).
6) Dystopia, not Utopia!
a. Man should never so desire a utopia that he is willing to throw away everything which has made him what he is (conflict/war/suffering/adversity/difficulty). Man was not made into what he is (evolution/adaptation) in peace/utopia. To destroy or toss away all of that which made him who he is is unthinkable.
b. Dystopia is the opposite of Utopia! It is literally the increasing of suffering/war/adversity/difficulty/conflict. If a man is to cure Cancer in a Dystopia, another man should generate something to take its place. If a civil uprising is to occur, Dynamic government will allow and control it. The conflict prevents decay of tyrannical systems by their very nature to dominate. If war is to cease, new war must be in the works. If citizens are content with their lives (like cattle in the field) the Dynamic government should force down its boot.
c. Dystopia as a 'rule' can often negate 'open palm' in given situations.
7) Chip everyone!
a. What can I say? I support the idea of digital identification! (Hackers will do what they will do).
8) Religion is necessary and should be treated depending on situations.
a. The Dynamic government should at times accept religious conflict and population of religions contrary/similar to state law/code/'belief'. Religion tests the presumed 'strong/elite' of humanity. IE: Christianity produces weakness/dependency in those who adhere to it. The act of following it is not the concern, it is the act of continuing to follow it lifelong. Religions like this must exist to test the 'spirit' (will to progress) of a human being and must exist to generate a variety in warfare/conflict.
9) Morality is a tool of control/conflict.
a. Producing morals (do this because -this is good- do not do this because -this is bad-) is a tool to control the majority. It causes conflict (via disagreement) and division.
10) Though I support Tyranny, I also support "Liberation".
a. The Dynamic government should never be 'the same always' as seen by the people. For example: let us suppose the current political construct is Communism and Communism has ceased to be functional for the times (due to change in world situation/direction of human progress). The duty of Dynamic government (Oligarchy ALWAYS - whether behind the scenes or up front [and this image must also constantly change to the public]) is to delegate the responsibility of political shift to one of two parties.
(i) Party/parties outside the oligarchy (resistance movements)
(ii) Party/parties within the oligarchy.
Once the party/parties have been decided, the green light is to be given for (in the case of the resistance movement) success of that movement. That is, the 'hands off' approach (government increases public hatred of it and does not intervene with the resistance).
If the party/parties are within the oligarchy, a resistance movement will be founded or created (by the Dynamic government increasing public hatred again).
b. Dynamic government is to take over (or simply observe) the new government which forms after anarchy.
c. Dynamic government must always exist to SHAKE up tyrannies and reform them when liberation is in excess.
-For now, that is all-
1) I support population reduction (non-racial eugenics, soft and hard kill)
a. Non-Racial Eugenics - Processes like sterilization of those deemed unfit to bare offspring due to hereditary illnesses or mutations which could be potentially passed on to offspring and would weaken the genetic stock. One/two child policies would also fall under this category.
b. Soft Kill - Methods of reducing population numbers which occur slowly and over a given period of time. Diseases like Cancer would (if purposely generated) be defined as a soft kill. Another soft kill would be tainting food/water supplies with various toxins - producing sickness in the strong and death in the weak. It also tends to decrease the overall longevity of a population, causing a greater need for pharmaceuticals, hospital stays and dependency on the government for vaccines (where applicable).
c. Hard Kill - A virus like Ebola would be (if purposely generated) effective at reducing large numbers of population quickly. Generally hard kill refers to rapid methods of population reduction and can include genocide. Another example of a hard kill would be a world-wide pandemic of which recovery was minimal.
2) I support gun control.
a. Gun control does not take away the arms of those who have registered them. It prevents those who would misuse them or who cannot properly use them from owning them in the first place. It does not prevent those who have their minds set on committing crime with guns (IE: black market guns) from committing crime.
3) I support a merit/plutocracy
a. Rule by merit and rule by money - This is a basic understanding merit/plutocracy. If a citizen has merit and money, he is fit to hold office. If a citizen has merit and little money, he is fit to hold office. If a citizen has extreme wealth and no merit, he is unfit to hold office. If a citizen has no wealth and no merit, he is unfit to hold office.
b. Merit permits purchased crime but requires wealth - If a citizen has a high degree of wealth and merit, he may opt to purchase crime. This means he may PURCHASE the temporary right to break the law. If he desires to kill someone he despises, he may purchase that temporary right and do so. The concept is like creating a license to be independent of legal prosecution for a period of time. The fee to produce this crime-license is high and cannot be purchased by those who do not have a given level of accepted merit. Also, the type of crime-license depends on the amount of merit.
If the citizen has little wealth, obviously he cannot purchase a license. If a citizen who has enough merit but not enough wealth breaks into a house or steals money, his merit is reduced (he cannot purchase a license).
Licenses do not extend to all crimes regardless of how much wealth or merit is involved (Limited Licenses). Murdering political figures, bombing a country (etc) are not acceptable as reasons for a license.
c. The amount of merit decides the State-provided conditions of living - If a citizen has greater merit without great wealth, he shall be given more than the basic needs of life by the State. (The State gives to every citizen plus [blank] starting merit [at birth] and this increases as the citizen earns and serves the community).
d. Tax exemption and tax breaks for merit, not money - Those who have high merit are given a decreased rate or tax or in rare situations do not have to pay tax (if their corporation follows all legislation and employs 'X' number of citizens in stable working conditions) (if they serve the community in a major way) (if they are 'heros' [those who have preserved the stability of government, those who have went beyond common acts of heroism to prevent/stop disruption/terrorism).
e. Flat tax - No citizen (with the exception of reasons of merit) will pay any more than any other citizen (wealthy or unwealthy). If merit is in the negative zone, tax may or may not be increased depending on the general wealth level of the citizen.
4) I support A Open Palm/Closed Fist Dynamic Government.
a. The government should in times of war be as a 'closed fist' (unwavering, unwilling to compromise and unwilling to even hear thoughts of 'democracy' or protest from the citizens under it). In 'open palm' (times of peace/minimal conflict), the government should be yielding to the wishes of citizens and non-tyrannical. Protest and democratic systems under moderation are to be permitted. (Reason: The world is dynamic [ever changing] thus the government should also be).
5) I support war, not peace.
a. In war, civilization grows. The victor learns or falls, as does the conquered. In peace, there is no conflict thus no real growth. However, war should be broken by momentary peace (dynamic).
6) Dystopia, not Utopia!
a. Man should never so desire a utopia that he is willing to throw away everything which has made him what he is (conflict/war/suffering/adversity/difficulty). Man was not made into what he is (evolution/adaptation) in peace/utopia. To destroy or toss away all of that which made him who he is is unthinkable.
b. Dystopia is the opposite of Utopia! It is literally the increasing of suffering/war/adversity/difficulty/conflict. If a man is to cure Cancer in a Dystopia, another man should generate something to take its place. If a civil uprising is to occur, Dynamic government will allow and control it. The conflict prevents decay of tyrannical systems by their very nature to dominate. If war is to cease, new war must be in the works. If citizens are content with their lives (like cattle in the field) the Dynamic government should force down its boot.
c. Dystopia as a 'rule' can often negate 'open palm' in given situations.
7) Chip everyone!
a. What can I say? I support the idea of digital identification! (Hackers will do what they will do).
8) Religion is necessary and should be treated depending on situations.
a. The Dynamic government should at times accept religious conflict and population of religions contrary/similar to state law/code/'belief'. Religion tests the presumed 'strong/elite' of humanity. IE: Christianity produces weakness/dependency in those who adhere to it. The act of following it is not the concern, it is the act of continuing to follow it lifelong. Religions like this must exist to test the 'spirit' (will to progress) of a human being and must exist to generate a variety in warfare/conflict.
9) Morality is a tool of control/conflict.
a. Producing morals (do this because -this is good- do not do this because -this is bad-) is a tool to control the majority. It causes conflict (via disagreement) and division.
10) Though I support Tyranny, I also support "Liberation".
a. The Dynamic government should never be 'the same always' as seen by the people. For example: let us suppose the current political construct is Communism and Communism has ceased to be functional for the times (due to change in world situation/direction of human progress). The duty of Dynamic government (Oligarchy ALWAYS - whether behind the scenes or up front [and this image must also constantly change to the public]) is to delegate the responsibility of political shift to one of two parties.
(i) Party/parties outside the oligarchy (resistance movements)
(ii) Party/parties within the oligarchy.
Once the party/parties have been decided, the green light is to be given for (in the case of the resistance movement) success of that movement. That is, the 'hands off' approach (government increases public hatred of it and does not intervene with the resistance).
If the party/parties are within the oligarchy, a resistance movement will be founded or created (by the Dynamic government increasing public hatred again).
b. Dynamic government is to take over (or simply observe) the new government which forms after anarchy.
c. Dynamic government must always exist to SHAKE up tyrannies and reform them when liberation is in excess.
-For now, that is all-
