• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My problem with atheism

ELoWolfe

Member
I recently saw a series of pictures that depicts either an interview or conversation with Stephen Fry. He discusses God. A video can be found here:

Guy Byrne: "Suppose what Oscar believed in as he died, in spite of your protestations. Suppose its all true. And you walk up to the pearly gates and are confronted by God. What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?

Stephen Fry: "I'd say, 'bone cancer in children? Whats that about? How dare you? How dare you create a world in which there is such misery that is not our fault? It's not right. Its utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-spirited, stupid god who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?' That's what I'd say."

Guy: "And you think you're going to get in?"

Stephen: "No! But I wouldn't want to. I wouldn't want to get in on his terms. They're wrong. Now, If I died and it was Pluto, Hades, and it was the twelve Greek gods, then I would have more truck with it, because the Greek's were... they didn't pretend not to be human in their appetites, their capriciousness and unreasonableness. They didn't present themselves as being all-seeing, all-wise, all-kind, all-beneficent. Because the god who created this universe, if indeed it was created by God, is quite clearly a maniac. Utter maniac. Totally selfish. We have to spend our life on our knees, thanking him? What kind of god would do that? Yes, the world is splendid, but it also has in it insects, whose whole life cycle is to burrow into the eyes of children and make them blind. That eat outwards from the eyes. How -- why? Why did you do that to us? You could easily have made a creation in which that didn't exist. It is simply not acceptable.

So you know, atheism is not just about them not believing there is a god, but on the assumption that there is one, what kind of god is he? It's perfectly apparent that he's monstrous, utterly monstrous, and deserves no respect whatsoever. The moment you banish him, your life becomes simpler, purer, cleaner, and more worth living in my opinion."

I am sure those of you who read this as Gnostics can see where the problem rests.

I agree with everything he said, because he is describing the so-called "Demiurge." However, he is able to go outside the social norms but instead of trying to think outside of the box, he throws the box away completely. He says "I do not believe in this (Judeo-Christianity), so I will instead believe in nothing!" He does not say "perhaps there is something else?" And he certainly does not seem to be able to think "millions of people have had a number of religious and spiritual connection to something, so I should look at others." Instead, it is "this religion (Judeo-Christianity) is correct or nothing is."

If you existed in a culture that did not know other modes of faith, I could understand. But we are in an age of globalization. Unfamiliarity is no excuse to dismiss all faith. To do so is just intellectual laziness. It is a childish reaction to the faith you grew up with. It is an act of rebellion that lacks maturity.

Of course not all Atheists are like this. Yet I have seen few Atheists who have seriously considered all there is in the world. Few have tried to walk different paths and still found them lacking. Instead, they say "this path is twisted. No more walking for me," and then choose to simply sit down instead of walking a different direction!

There are many objections to Judeo-Christianity. I feel all of these are answered by Gnosticism. And sadly, these people don't know about it, don't care about it, or are simply too afraid for it.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
I think a lot of atheists in the west look at it as 'Christian God' or 'Atheism'. They don't consider they can choose neither of the two and explore other ways of looking at existence. Atheists on average are probably of a little higher logical intelligence but I think there is so much of value they close their minds to.
 

gsa

Well-Known Member
Can I ask, what are the atheist objections to Abrahamic monotheism that are overcome by Gnosticism?
 

Ultimatum

Classical Liberal
I think a lot of atheists in the west look at it as 'Christian God' or 'Atheism'. They don't consider they can choose neither of the two and explore other ways of looking at existence. Atheists on average are probably of a little higher logical intelligence but I think there is so much of value they close their minds to.

and explore other ways of looking at existence.
Well, I'm sorry, but the supernatural is not a way of looking at anything, but building totally unsubstantiated presumptions, which convinces the adherent to such an extent, that offer nothing but wishful thinking.

What "other ways" of looking at existence, aside from what we can observe and what we can discover as we progress, do you suppose?
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
and explore other ways of looking at existence.
Well, I'm sorry, but the supernatural is not a way of looking at anything, but building totally unsubstantiated presumptions, which convinces the adherent to such an extent, that offer nothing but wishful thinking.

What "other ways" of looking at existence, aside from what we can observe and what we can discover as we progress, do you suppose?
By carefully considering whether people might experience real things outside the reach of their five mundane senses. But as my last sentence said some people 'close their mind to the possibility'. I have studied such claims and clearly believe the quantity, quality and consistency of the anecdotal accounts tell me something real is going on that does not fit the materialist-atheist worldview. In fact I believe the great wisdom traditions of India explain these things well.
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
I recently saw a series of pictures that depicts either an interview or conversation with Stephen Fry. He discusses God. A video can be found here:

Guy Byrne: "Suppose what Oscar believed in as he died, in spite of your protestations. Suppose its all true. And you walk up to the pearly gates and are confronted by God. What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?

Stephen Fry: "I'd say, 'bone cancer in children? Whats that about? How dare you? How dare you create a world in which there is such misery that is not our fault? It's not right. Its utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-spirited, stupid god who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?' That's what I'd say."

Guy: "And you think you're going to get in?"

Stephen: "No! But I wouldn't want to. I wouldn't want to get in on his terms. They're wrong. Now, If I died and it was Pluto, Hades, and it was the twelve Greek gods, then I would have more truck with it, because the Greek's were... they didn't pretend not to be human in their appetites, their capriciousness and unreasonableness. They didn't present themselves as being all-seeing, all-wise, all-kind, all-beneficent. Because the god who created this universe, if indeed it was created by God, is quite clearly a maniac. Utter maniac. Totally selfish. We have to spend our life on our knees, thanking him? What kind of god would do that? Yes, the world is splendid, but it also has in it insects, whose whole life cycle is to burrow into the eyes of children and make them blind. That eat outwards from the eyes. How -- why? Why did you do that to us? You could easily have made a creation in which that didn't exist. It is simply not acceptable.

So you know, atheism is not just about them not believing there is a god, but on the assumption that there is one, what kind of god is he? It's perfectly apparent that he's monstrous, utterly monstrous, and deserves no respect whatsoever. The moment you banish him, your life becomes simpler, purer, cleaner, and more worth living in my opinion."

I am sure those of you who read this as Gnostics can see where the problem rests.

I agree with everything he said, because he is describing the so-called "Demiurge." However, he is able to go outside the social norms but instead of trying to think outside of the box, he throws the box away completely. He says "I do not believe in this (Judeo-Christianity), so I will instead believe in nothing!" He does not say "perhaps there is something else?" And he certainly does not seem to be able to think "millions of people have had a number of religious and spiritual connection to something, so I should look at others." Instead, it is "this religion (Judeo-Christianity) is correct or nothing is."

If you existed in a culture that did not know other modes of faith, I could understand. But we are in an age of globalization. Unfamiliarity is no excuse to dismiss all faith. To do so is just intellectual laziness. It is a childish reaction to the faith you grew up with. It is an act of rebellion that lacks maturity.

Of course not all Atheists are like this. Yet I have seen few Atheists who have seriously considered all there is in the world. Few have tried to walk different paths and still found them lacking. Instead, they say "this path is twisted. No more walking for me," and then choose to simply sit down instead of walking a different direction!

There are many objections to Judeo-Christianity. I feel all of these are answered by Gnosticism. And sadly, these people don't know about it, don't care about it, or are simply too afraid for it.
I think part of the problem is that Gnostic views really are not that well known. And even if they are while they may seem more reasonable to an atheist that person might still think there is no good reason to believe in a deity anyway. Really it comes down to knowing God as an internal reality and not everyone has that experience.
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
If I may, as an atheist, make a quick comment in the DIR? Gnostic view solves the big moral issues I have associated with the (unjust) God of many dominant Christian views. I don't have a reason to believe in either the Demiurge or God though. So basically I agree with what nazz said.
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
and explore other ways of looking at existence.
Well, I'm sorry, but the supernatural is not a way of looking at anything, but building totally unsubstantiated presumptions, which convinces the adherent to such an extent, that offer nothing but wishful thinking.

What "other ways" of looking at existence, aside from what we can observe and what we can discover as we progress, do you suppose?
Please read the rules for DIR's. Anyway, no one said anything about the "supernatural". I hate that word.
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
Tell me more, if you will? :)
Gnostic thinkers adopted the idea of the demiurge from Greek philosophy. The demiurge is the creator of this world ("crafter" would be a better term). Depending on the individual writer the demiurge was seen as either evil or at least imperfect. Therefore his creation is also imperfect and thus there is both evil and good in the universe. Gnostics further asserted that there was a deity higher than the demiurge who is not the creator of this world and therefore the problem of evil does not exist as applied to that being.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
Gnostic thinkers adopted the idea of the demiurge from Greek philosophy. The demiurge is the creator of this world ("crafter" would be a better term). Depending on the individual writer the demiurge was seen as either evil or at least imperfect. Therefore his creation is also imperfect and thus there is both evil and good in the universe. Gnostics further asserted that there was a deity higher than the demiurge who is not the creator of this world and therefore the problem of evil does not exist as applied to that being.
then what's the point of worshipping said being?
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
If I may, as an atheist, make a quick comment in the DIR? Gnostic view solves the big moral issues I have associated with the (unjust) God of many dominant Christian views. I don't have a reason to believe in either the Demiurge or God though. So basically I agree with what nazz said.
I think there are some good reasons to believe in both. There are clues we can observe and we can also apply logic to the question. But ultimately this kind of belief is merely a gateway. What matters is to obtain personal knowledge of the God within.
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
then what's the point of worshipping said being?
My own personal answer is that it feels good to do so. There is a positive experience that results from doing so and there is positive transformative power in that experience..
 

JRMcC

Active Member
I think a lot of atheists in the west look at it as 'Christian God' or 'Atheism'. They don't consider they can choose neither of the two and explore other ways of looking at existence. Atheists on average are probably of a little higher logical intelligence but I think there is so much of value they close their minds to.

Agreed, the atheist in the video is only addressing one God concept. You can always tell when an atheist knows nothing of eastern religion, just by the way they talk.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
I recently saw a series of pictures that depicts either an interview or conversation with Stephen Fry. He discusses God. A video can be found here:

Guy Byrne: "Suppose what Oscar believed in as he died, in spite of your protestations. Suppose its all true. And you walk up to the pearly gates and are confronted by God. What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?

Stephen Fry: "I'd say, 'bone cancer in children? Whats that about? How dare you? How dare you create a world in which there is such misery that is not our fault? It's not right. Its utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-spirited, stupid god who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?' That's what I'd say."

Guy: "And you think you're going to get in?"

Stephen: "No! But I wouldn't want to. I wouldn't want to get in on his terms. They're wrong. Now, If I died and it was Pluto, Hades, and it was the twelve Greek gods, then I would have more truck with it, because the Greek's were... they didn't pretend not to be human in their appetites, their capriciousness and unreasonableness. They didn't present themselves as being all-seeing, all-wise, all-kind, all-beneficent. Because the god who created this universe, if indeed it was created by God, is quite clearly a maniac. Utter maniac. Totally selfish. We have to spend our life on our knees, thanking him? What kind of god would do that? Yes, the world is splendid, but it also has in it insects, whose whole life cycle is to burrow into the eyes of children and make them blind. That eat outwards from the eyes. How -- why? Why did you do that to us? You could easily have made a creation in which that didn't exist. It is simply not acceptable.

So you know, atheism is not just about them not believing there is a god, but on the assumption that there is one, what kind of god is he? It's perfectly apparent that he's monstrous, utterly monstrous, and deserves no respect whatsoever. The moment you banish him, your life becomes simpler, purer, cleaner, and more worth living in my opinion."

I am sure those of you who read this as Gnostics can see where the problem rests.

I agree with everything he said, because he is describing the so-called "Demiurge." However, he is able to go outside the social norms but instead of trying to think outside of the box, he throws the box away completely. He says "I do not believe in this (Judeo-Christianity), so I will instead believe in nothing!" He does not say "perhaps there is something else?" And he certainly does not seem to be able to think "millions of people have had a number of religious and spiritual connection to something, so I should look at others." Instead, it is "this religion (Judeo-Christianity) is correct or nothing is."

If you existed in a culture that did not know other modes of faith, I could understand. But we are in an age of globalization. Unfamiliarity is no excuse to dismiss all faith. To do so is just intellectual laziness. It is a childish reaction to the faith you grew up with. It is an act of rebellion that lacks maturity.

Of course not all Atheists are like this. Yet I have seen few Atheists who have seriously considered all there is in the world. Few have tried to walk different paths and still found them lacking. Instead, they say "this path is twisted. No more walking for me," and then choose to simply sit down instead of walking a different direction!

There are many objections to Judeo-Christianity. I feel all of these are answered by Gnosticism. And sadly, these people don't know about it, don't care about it, or are simply too afraid for it.

Ever since I was a child, I had no shadow of doubt that all other gods ( other than the christian god ) were either a fabrication or the result of a gross misunderstanding. This is not something that came to me when I became an atheist, rather it goes all the way back to when I was a christian. I think that a lot of atheists are in a similar position.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
My own personal answer is that it feels good to do so. There is a positive experience that results from doing so and there is positive transformative power in that experience..

Do you expect that specific answer to be representative of a fair percentage of other Gnostic Christians? Would you feel like offering an estimation of how many?
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
Atheism is really just a natural conclusion, if u will. The definition 'lack of belief,' really is misleading because it implies that they are missing 'something.' But, most atheists I know of, are very happy and fulfilled. (I wasn't one such atheist...I'm most comfortable following faith.) But, religion and faith taps into our emotion more than anything else, really...we (believers) can't logically prove to anyone that a god exists...and if we could, then it wouldn't be called 'faith.'
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Pretty much all of them that I know of. But mainly the problem of evil.

I don't have that problem thanks to spending years in thought about such things, including exploring Gnosticism. Fry's thoughts on the topic seem to be the result of not doing much thinking or only viewing Christianity through a very superficial lens. I feel bad for people like him. It's so cliched to just blame everything on God when he wouldn't even have his life without God, and his life as a famous and rich actor seems to be going pretty well. (Statements like his from people in privileged positions such as his strike me as rather immature and...well, stupid. Just being honest.)
 
Top