My question to Trump Supporters

[2ndpillar]

One major difference is that Bernie is actually educated and has a political background and understand policy and constitutional law, Trump doesn’t.

Bernie's communist/socialist most memorable political background move, is that he took his honeymoon in Russia, and apparently, he has never met a socialist he didn't like. I think this view is addressed best by Einstein's attributed statement: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"?

 

[Revoltingest]

Bernie's communist/socialist most memorable political background move, is that he took his honeymoon in Russia, and apparently, he has never met a socialist he didn't like. I think this view is addressed best by Einstein's attributed statement: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"?

My view of Bernie....
There's no risk that he'd impose socialism upon us...at least no greater a risk
than with Hillary. But his peacenik penchant meant a reduced likelihood of
war & playing policeman to the world. His being a self described "socialist"
was largely irrelevant, my preferring a "capitalist" notwithstanding. This made
him the better candidate than either Hillary or Donald.

 

[2ndpillar]

I voted for Trump because he represents my own conscience. Even the "bad" stuff he does, I like!

Trump is like the rogue, Yehu, who hunted down Jezebel, the witch Clinton, and destroyed her, at which time, the dogs, the media, ate her flesh.(2 Kings 9:4-) Now we have to wait for the dogs to turn on each other, and the followers of Jezebel, the deep state, and losers, such as Bernie, the new rich socialist on the block. The question in my mind, is how much of Hillary's charity money wound up in Bernie's pockets. The guy apparently took a dive. No one is that big a doormat, or can they?

2 Kings 9:4 the young man, the servant of the prophet, went to Ramoth-gilead. 5 When he came, behold, the captains of the army were sitting, and he said, “I have a word for you, O captain.” And Jehu said, “c]' data-fn="#fen-NASB-9762c">[c]For which one of us?” And he said, “For you, O captain.” 6 He arose and went into the house, and he poured the oil on his head and said to him, “Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, ‘I)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9763I">I have anointed you king over the people of the Lord, even over Israel. 7 You shall strike the house of Ahab your master, J)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764J">that I may avenge K)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764K">the blood of My servants the prophets, and the blood of all the servants of the Lord, L)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764L">at the hand of Jezebel. 8 For the whole house of Ahab shall perish, and M)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765M">I will cut off from Ahab N)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765N">every male person O)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765O">both bond and free in Israel. 9 P)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9766P">I will make the house of Ahab like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and Q)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9766Q">like the house of Baasha the son of Ahijah. 10 R)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9767R">The dogs shall eat Jezebel in the territory of Jezreel, and none shall bury her.’” Then he opened the door and fled.

 

[Lyndon]

cuckoo, cuckoo!!

 

[Cooky]

Trump is like the rogue, Yehu, who hunted down Jezebel, the witch Clinton, and destroyed her, at which time, the dogs, the media, ate her flesh.(2 Kings 9:4-)

2 Kings 9:4 the young man, the servant of the prophet, went to Ramoth-gilead. 5 When he came, behold, the captains of the army were sitting, and he said, “I have a word for you, O captain.” And Jehu said, “c]' data-fn="#fen-NASB-9762c">[c]For which one of us?” And he said, “For you, O captain.” 6 He arose and went into the house, and he poured the oil on his head and said to him, “Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, ‘I)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9763I">I have anointed you king over the people of the Lord, even over Israel. 7 You shall strike the house of Ahab your master, J)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764J">that I may avenge K)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764K">the blood of My servants the prophets, and the blood of all the servants of the Lord, L)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764L">at the hand of Jezebel. 8 For the whole house of Ahab shall perish, and M)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765M">I will cut off from Ahab N)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765N">every male person O)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765O">both bond and free in Israel. 9 P)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9766P">I will make the house of Ahab like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and Q)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9766Q">like the house of Baasha the son of Ahijah. 10 R)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9767R">The dogs shall eat Jezebel in the territory of Jezreel, and none shall bury her.’” Then he opened the door and fled.

I agree. Hillary is dog food.

 

[Cooky]

cuckoo, cuckoo!!

 

[Mindmaster]

What they fail to mention, however, is that the party to which they refer to no longer exists. The only thing that remains of the original Republican Party is the name. And how the Grand Ole Party transformed itself from the party of Lincoln into the current version—a white, Southern party rife with racial resentment—has become a forgotten tale that takes advantage of America’s lack of historical knowledge and abundance of short-term memory when it comes to race.“


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...rty-became-the-party-of-racism-1827779221/amp

That article, I can't man. That's such obvious tripe -- "oh, this party has more white people in it, therefore it must be more racist". There is simply no correlation, not at all. Then the rest of the article is composed of random snippets to style a narrative that fits the articles "conclusion" this is just fishing for coherence where absolutely no coherence exists.

There are the obvious boners too like using words that people don't understand the same, for example, the word "evolved". Some people might think biologically, intellectually, some may think culturally, and some might think economically - without a qualification the statement "white people think black people are less evolved" is completely meaningless.

Other questions in there are just baited, for example, if you ask something like "Do you think black people could do better if they tried harder?", of course, the answer is yes. Because, ANYONE would do better if they tried harder, lol.

Mathematically, diversity -- as in mandatory participation of certain amounts of racial groups is racist. Most white people I know against it are mostly against it for that reason -- they believe merit should be the reason you obtain your opportunities. Again, this article plays more games to stew its narrative.

If you think all Democrats are magically free from racism you have to look no further than the cultures of which they court voters from at this time, and it's immediately apparent that those cultures are not. Hispanics generally dislike black folks and vice-versa, culturally. I'm sure the last 60 years of progressive awesome smoothed over this beef as well as 200 years since slavery made everything OK between whites and blacks. Oh wait, they must be "still racist", because white people voted to end that and segregation and assure they could vote and so on, because that can't possibly change. Yeah, that's nonsense.

P.S. - But, I've never heard Democrats or their leadership denouncing their involvement in/with the KKK, so there is that.

 

[Cooky]

Just more race-bait agitators stirring up trouble.

 

[Lyndon]

Is this some kind of free zone for airing racist tripe???

 

[Kenny]

You do realize there are other presidential candidates on the ballot?

None that would accomplish what I listed.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

It seems that my view of politicians differs from yours & most people's.
To me, Trump, Obama, & the others are not human beings to be liked,
disliked, supported, opposed, deified, or demonized. Instead, it's all
about what happens (or doesn't) as a result of their being in office.
Even small efforts can have large consequences.

First Steps probably would have happened without. Even Indiana passed legislation of a similar nature a few a years ago. And, like so many other things in Trump's highly contradictory presidency, it stands in direct opposition to his appointment of Jeff Sessions and his endorsement of Roy Moore.
I would hope he changes his underwear as frequently as he contradicts himself.

 

[Revoltingest]

First Steps probably would have happened without. Even Indiana passed legislation of a similar nature a few a years ago. And, like so many other things in Trump's highly contradictory presidency, it stands in direct opposition to his appointment of Jeff Sessions and his endorsement of Roy Moore.
I would hope he changes his underwear as frequently as he contradicts himself.

Do you oppose the bill he signed into law?

 

[Epic Beard Man]

Bernie's communist/socialist most memorable political background move, is that he took his honeymoon in Russia, and apparently, he has never met a socialist he didn't like. I think this view is addressed best by Einstein's attributed statement: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"?

I don't even think you know what socialism is. I see you didn't respond to the truths I stated regarding your president.

 

[Epic Beard Man]

That article, I can't man. That's such obvious tripe -- "oh, this party has more white people in it, therefore it must be more racist". There is simply no correlation, not at all. Then the rest of the article is composed of random snippets to style a narrative that fits the articles "conclusion" this is just fishing for coherence where absolutely no coherence exists.

There are the obvious boners too like using words that people don't understand the same, for example, the word "evolved". Some people might think biologically, intellectually, some may think culturally, and some might think economically - without a qualification the statement "white people think black people are less evolved" is completely meaningless.

Other questions in there are just baited, for example, if you ask something like "Do you think black people could do better if they tried harder?", of course, the answer is yes. Because, ANYONE would do better if they tried harder, lol.

Mathematically, diversity -- as in mandatory participation of certain amounts of racial groups is racist. Most white people I know against it are mostly against it for that reason -- they believe merit should be the reason you obtain your opportunities. Again, this article plays more games to stew its narrative.

If you think all Democrats are magically free from racism you have to look no further than the cultures of which they court voters from at this time, and it's immediately apparent that those cultures are not. Hispanics generally dislike black folks and vice-versa, culturally. I'm sure the last 60 years of progressive awesome smoothed over this beef as well as 200 years since slavery made everything OK between whites and blacks. Oh wait, they must be "still racist", because white people voted to end that and segregation and assure they could vote and so on, because that can't possibly change. Yeah, that's nonsense.

P.S. - But, I've never heard Democrats or their leadership denouncing their involvement in/with the KKK, so there is that.

Apparently you don't do reading...The fact is the parties switched! The democrats especially political leaders have denounced white supremacy for years! Just recently the mayoral race in Florida Andrew Gilum you remember him and addressing the monkeying around comment? There are plenty Democrats that address white supremacy the umbrella the klan is under.

Your point? Republicans do not. Republicans never addressed Steve King until weeks later after he made that racist comment.

 

[Epic Beard Man]

None that would accomplish what I listed.

How do you know they were never president?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Do you oppose the bill he signed into law?

It didn't go far enough with it only addressing federal prisons.

 

[Epic Beard Man]

Just more race-bait agitators stirring up trouble.

Who is racebaiting?

I'm so sick of the cowardice on these boards sometimes. Trump literally has a history of racism in his family.

 

[Cooky]

Is this some kind of free zone for airing racist tripe???

I'm not quite sure I understand what you mean.

 

[Epic Beard Man]

Trump is like the rogue, Yehu, who hunted down Jezebel, the witch Clinton, and destroyed her, at which time, the dogs, the media, ate her flesh.(2 Kings 9:4-) Now we have to wait for the dogs to turn on each other, and the followers of Jezebel, the deep state, and losers, such as Bernie, the new rich socialist on the block. The question in my mind, is how much of Hillary's charity money wound up in Bernie's pockets. The guy apparently took a dive. No one is that big a doormat, or can they?

2 Kings 9:4 the young man, the servant of the prophet, went to Ramoth-gilead. 5 When he came, behold, the captains of the army were sitting, and he said, “I have a word for you, O captain.” And Jehu said, “c]' data-fn="#fen-NASB-9762c">[c]For which one of us?” And he said, “For you, O captain.” 6 He arose and went into the house, and he poured the oil on his head and said to him, “Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, ‘I)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9763I">I have anointed you king over the people of the Lord, even over Israel. 7 You shall strike the house of Ahab your master, J)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764J">that I may avenge K)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764K">the blood of My servants the prophets, and the blood of all the servants of the Lord, L)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9764L">at the hand of Jezebel. 8 For the whole house of Ahab shall perish, and M)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765M">I will cut off from Ahab N)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765N">every male person O)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9765O">both bond and free in Israel. 9 P)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9766P">I will make the house of Ahab like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and Q)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9766Q">like the house of Baasha the son of Ahijah. 10 R)' data-cr="#cen-NASB-9767R">The dogs shall eat Jezebel in the territory of Jezreel, and none shall bury her.’” Then he opened the door and fled.

You're a very bizarre individual.

 

[Epic Beard Man]

I voted for Trump because he represents my own conscience. Even the "bad" stuff he does, I like!

So you support a racist, xenophobe, and sexist. What does that say about your conscience?