Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hi, sorry to be a wet blanket but are you sure that the Dalai Lama is deserving of a place there?
Wow, you have a voice!
Shrine looks good! Hope it helps brings you inner peace.
From what I was told (not 100% sure it's true) you CAN have a picture of the Dalai lama or a past family member. Am I correct?
Firstly, such legalistic observance of rules for rituals and whatnot is, in my opinion, an outgrowth of the dust that has collected on the mirror. It isn't Buddhist.
Secondly, I don't think the Dalai Lama would mind his presence there but it speaks to me something about the human mind that we so readily accept the spiritual credentials of others when they're trumpeted by institutions associated, rightly or wrongly, with a philosophy we identify with.
I may have done the same - but I have a little bit of insider knowledge as to the workings of institutional Tibetan Buddhism, and want nothing to do with it, least of all the ringleader of the Tibetan Refugee Fund racket.
You may wish to read a book by the Trimondis called "The Shadow of the Dalai Lama" - they are extremely erudite writers with a good grasp of vajrayana doctrines, although they ultimately fail to understand the meaning and instead describe doctrines and practices in a sinister light due to this misunderstanding. Nonetheless, they accurately portray Tibetan history up to and including the present Dalai Lama.
Dalai Lamas, since the 5th, have had a long history of atrocities and enacting tyranny on the Tibetan people - and other schools of Buddhism. Although we play nicer now for the Western cameras, there's still a oppression and persecution emanating from His Holiness' office. The Dalai Lama meddles in the affairs of the other schools, pretending to speak for all of Tibetan Buddhism rather than the refugee government.
The Dalai Lama is in no way shape or form the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism as a whole; not even his own sect, the Gelugpa (although, practically, he is the most temporally powerful spiritual leader, and controls the appointments of the spiritual leaders).
Nonetheless, he meddles in the affairs of the other schools and the West, which he plays up to parroting the doctrines we hold dear; rainbows and puppies and hallmark card worthy quotes, knows nothing of the true history of the Dalai Lama's position. For example, we don't know about the rampant child sex abuse in Tibetan monasteries - especially Gelug ones due to how this tendency historically manifested and institutionally justified itself - and the corresponding AIDS micro-epidemic in these monasteries as a result.
For whatever it's worth, I'm a karma kagyu initiate.
Excuse my ignorance but is this all a rant because you don't like the Dalai Lama or is it because there are really things going on? Are you a Tibetan buddhist? Or another sec?
From what I was told (not 100% sure it's true) you CAN have a picture of the Dalai lama or a past family member. Am I correct?
Firstly, such legalistic observance of rules for rituals and whatnot is, in my opinion, an outgrowth of the dust that has collected on the mirror. It isn't Buddhist.
Secondly, I don't think the Dalai Lama would mind his presence there but it speaks to me something about the human mind that we so readily accept the spiritual credentials of others when they're trumpeted by institutions associated, rightly or wrongly, with a philosophy we identify with.
I may have done the same - but I have a little bit of insider knowledge as to the workings of institutional Tibetan Buddhism, and want nothing to do with it, least of all the ringleader of the Tibetan Refugee Fund racket.
You may wish to read a book by the Trimondis called "The Shadow of the Dalai Lama" - they are extremely erudite writers with a good grasp of vajrayana doctrines, although they ultimately fail to understand the meaning and instead describe doctrines and practices in a sinister light due to this misunderstanding. Nonetheless, they accurately portray Tibetan history up to and including the present Dalai Lama.
Dalai Lamas, since the 5th, have had a long history of atrocities and enacting tyranny on the Tibetan people - and other schools of Buddhism. Although we play nicer now for the Western cameras, there's still a oppression and persecution emanating from His Holiness' office. The Dalai Lama meddles in the affairs of the other schools, pretending to speak for all of Tibetan Buddhism rather than the refugee government.
The Dalai Lama is in no way shape or form the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism as a whole; not even his own sect, the Gelugpa (although, practically, he is the most temporally powerful spiritual leader, and controls the appointments of the spiritual leaders).
Nonetheless, he meddles in the affairs of the other schools and the West, which he plays up to parroting the doctrines we hold dear; rainbows and puppies and hallmark card worthy quotes, knows nothing of the true history of the Dalai Lama's position. For example, we don't know about the rampant child sex abuse in Tibetan monasteries - especially Gelug ones due to how this tendency historically manifested and institutionally justified itself - and the corresponding AIDS micro-epidemic in these monasteries as a result.
For whatever it's worth, I'm a karma kagyu initiate.