Name as identity of God

[questfortruth]

Is it your belief that God has objective existence, is found in the world external to the self, nature?

Please read the Wikipedia article about Christianity, can you do it for me? I am true Christian; I am following this article. The Dogma of Christianity is: "God is the Being, who exists outside our heads and inside our heads. The Donald Trump exists outside our heads only, not inside our heads. But God exists outside our heads, and inside our heads."

But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with. 1 Peter 3:15.

Atheists tempt believers by asking a strange question: If God created the world, then who created God? And atheists answer: the First God was created by the Second God, this one by the Third, the Third by the Fourth, and so on. And they conclude that this is absurd.
I ask: why do they think it's funny and ridiculous? Why can't the chain of gods be infinite? Because atheists are Christians. Why? Atheists know perfectly well from Christianity that no one created God. But they seem to be Anti-Christians. If so, atheists are Christians with a minus sign."

More in: Most strange questions Quest was answering in his career

 

[rational experiences]

Natural laws are with natural humans..... one moment no human.... next moment two humans. Exact human advice owning no argument.

Who owns the topic?

A human.

Who did the review?

A human.

What's your owned answer?

A humans answer I'm human no matter what stories I false preach.

Not a God!

You the human then put thought into a human only my thought pretend mode.

I claim if I were god I ......blah blah yet all terms said in the presence life is a human. The human looking at every body in its present and natural law.

With rock. Owning bones. Don't belong anywhere else. No bones no human at all. Just dusts. Human bio combustion ashes. Human disintegration dusts. Satanic human theme not owned yet to cause.

Laws about humans caused non human life presence. Theoried by human Satanists.

Cosmic is first. Human says so. Space law zero only owns equals cold fused or iced positions holy law. Doesn't own any other body type. Law zero space frozen.

There isn't any cosmic theory by human stories. Known. They had to claim it legal. Gods earth rock human position for legal writing. Earth was given an entity status for human legal reasons.

Legal. I give God the entity creator as a human statement by my own words. God O rock created it's heavens. These words arent fake language as science is.

Law of god only owns mass. Thesis ends. At that statement position.

No other story is exact.

Legal said science Theists plus man's built machines isn't anywhere in any legal law said by humans. The machine attacked heavens. Changed both bodies.

They attacked life on earth. Legal we name scientists a satanist....banned outlawed satanisms.

Legal history

Church founded by rich man stated legally I'm a confessed man a hypocrite in civilisation supporting medical healers not Satanists.

Status as we know we Can't destroy civilisation. It would make you as evil as the first men who built it scenario.

Okay we must teach now. Our family must control your own hate and anger about him. Redevelop spiritual family society. Don't be like him otherwise they win causing you to be self destructive too. Life is holiness only.

Failed Satanists said we will predict your fathers celibate holy order and his healer pope future will be destroyed.

We will end your order....as the scientist satanist and by all our choices. Documented as proof he said it...a long time ago.

Satanic theists attack of the holy church. The church are just self representatives not the order paedophaelia.... separate believers as holy men by all practices their selves.

As any human can belong anywhere in status and not personally be evil by support of it or want of it.

Statement terms was by science satanism human men by order only acting out its human chosen prediction.

End of the healer founding father pope line. Satanism predicted it.

Satanist men were who had a n a l sex claiming it gave them satanic power? Satan brothers did and had been banned from church entry.

Natural human men are not Satanists by choice who are in love with their brother. It's a cause. Not owner of the same ban.

Now you know why. They had actually planned it. The takeover to be reinvented as their nuclear science want.

They all believe in aliens as humans life's destruction as their minds are Ai possessed.

They changed the name of Satan theirselves into the alien. Just as they changed the title satanist into scientist.

It's proven they always owned every reason to remove humans holy spiritual life support. By science machine chosen man acts. As science my newly written holy book.

Don't believe religious teachings. Yet they were about scientists. Known man's history stories told to everyone for a very long time. Technology proven it had existed before attacked nature on earth. As men today base the same thesis machine built on the old men's advice.

It's why humans natural spirituality refuses to give away a practice that had successfully supported conscious medical biological healing. Spirituality under any title is still spirituality as human behaviour only.

It's not the name it's the behaviour of family.

Only Satanists changed the medical herbal doctoring method of old when their mind brain was reburnt in new Satan star fall. Dark ages.

They prove by used terms they believe in darkness. Not life in light. Cold light also not illuminated light of science.

 

[blü 2]

The Dogma of Christianity is: "God is the Being, who exists outside our heads and inside our heads.["]

So in your view God has objective existence?

Then please describe this real God such that if we find a real candidate we can determine whether it's God or not.

If God exists in objective reality then [he] necessarily has such a description. In fact, a photo would help greatly.

And please don't forget to define "godness" so we distinguish God from some superscientist.

 

[questfortruth]

Then please describe this real God such that if we find a real candidate we can determine whether it's God or not.

@blü 2: " IF God is said to have objective existence, independently of anyone's concept of [him], why is there no coherent definition of such a god, so that if we found a real suspect, we could determine whether it was God or not? There's also no coherent definition of 'godness', the real quality a real god would have and a real superscientist who could create universes, raise the dead, travel in time and so on, would lack."

Quest: "So, if a being is Omnipotent, Omnipresent, All-powerful, and has created the Universe, hell and Paradise, has raised the people from the death, has defeated satan, he might be just a highly advanced alien from a distant planet, but not God. What would it make us to call him God? His name. If his true name is God, then he is God, not an alien from a distant planet. The identity of a person is his name, look in the video.

 

[blü 2]

No, that doesn't describe a real God such that if we found a real suspect we could determine whether it was God or not.

Nor does it give a clear definition of real "godness", the real quality that would distinguish God from a superscientist.

As I keep mentioning, if you don't know, just say so.

If you do know, state the answers in your own words.

 

[questfortruth]

if we found a real suspect we could determine whether it was God or not.

 

[Tinker Grey]

No, that doesn't describe a real God such that if we found a real suspect we could determine whether it was God or not.

if we found a real suspect we could determine whether it was God or not.

Stop changing the meaning of people's posts. That's dishonest, sinner.

 

[questfortruth]

Stop changing the meaning of people's posts. That's dishonest, sinner.

The satan is accuser, not you!

 

[Tinker Grey]

The satan is accuser, not you!

You're dishonest, aren't you? Sinner.

 

[questfortruth]

You're dishonest, aren't you? Sinner.

Are you saint?

 

[blü 2]

Okay, you really don't know.

Why didn't you just say so?

 

[questfortruth]

Okay, you really don't know.

Why didn't you just say so?

The imprint of God on nature is Dark Energy, the imprint of Paradise on nature is Dark Matter. I know my God.

 

[1213]

....God. It is not a position because there is only one God. God is unique identity of the Being. ...

Sorry, I disagree with that because there are many gods, and the one and only true God identifies as "I am":

For though there are things that are called "gods," whether in the heavens or on earth; as there are many "gods" and many "lords;" yet to us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we live through him.
1 Corinthians 8:5-6

God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM,” and he said, “You shall tell the children of Israel this: “I AM has sent me to you.”
Exodus 3:14

 

[questfortruth]

Sorry, I disagree with that because there are many gods

Because the name of God is God, all other gods have stolen the identity of God. So, they are false gods.

The imprint of God on nature is Dark Energy, the imprint of Paradise on nature is Dark Matter. I know my God.

 

[Tinker Grey]

Are you saint?

Doesn't matter. (Tu quoque fallacy) You've repeatedly claimed not to be a "damn sinner" and yet you sin all the time.

Why don't you apologize to @blü 2 and maybe your god'll forgive you.

 

[questfortruth]

Why don't you apologize to @blü 2 and maybe your god'll forgive you.

please prepare the text. I have no feeling to have sin. God knows if I have sin.

 

[questfortruth]

I have no sin.

Why don't you apologize to @blü 2 and maybe your god'll forgive you.

Sentence "I have no sin" means: "I have no feeling to have sin. God knows if I have sin."

 

[Colt]

@blü 2: " IF God is said to have objective existence, independently of anyone's concept of [him], why is there no coherent definition of such a god, so that if we found a real suspect, we could determine whether it was God or not? There's also no coherent definition of 'godness', the real quality a real god would have and a real superscientist who could create universes, raise the dead, travel in time and so on, would lack."

Quest: "So, if a being is Omnipotent, Omnipresent, All-powerful, and has created the Universe, hell and Paradise, has raised the people from the death, has defeated satan, he might be just a highly advanced alien from a distant planet, but not God. What would it make us to call him God? His name. If his true name is God, then he is God, not an alien from a distant planet. The identity of a person is his name, look in the video. Word God means All-Merciful. Many names have meaning, for example Jesus in Hebrew is Saviour. Girls in Russia have names Love, Hope, Faith"

Christine has said that word God translates as imploring in the English Theology. Hence, God means All-merciful because He is Imploring. Definition of implore | Dictionary.com
"Implore definition.... mercy". Why cannot God beg atheists to accept salvation?
Otherwise, sinner will kill God in his heart and joy-ly say with Nitzsche "God is dead."

God puts emphasize on the importance of the person's name. Hence, His name can be plain and simple - God. It is not a position/title/profession because there is only one God. God is unique identity of the Being. The unique identity is understood as name. It is definition of the name. For example, even the brave Trump or Biden have never said "I am God." God loves to talk about mystery of the name:

The one who is victorious I will make a pillar in the temple of My God. Never again will they leave it. I will write on them the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from My God; and I will also write on them My new name. Revelation 3:12

The sheep know the voice of the shepherd.

Remember how the apostles came to realize the identity of the Son of God?

 

[blü 2]

The imprint of God on nature is Dark Energy

As I said before, "dark energy" and "dark matter" are names of problems in physics, not name of things.

I know my God.

Not well enough to answer my questions ─ which is to say, not well enough to suggest that God has objective existence.