Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
For the last time, my definition for a human is a biologically human organism.
Which includes dead human corpses, a single set of disembodied human DNA, any random pair of human sperm and ova--not necessarily combined...
... and, of course, any human body part: because such a part contains a full set of human DNA.
All of these are biologically human organisms. Without the qualification of function? That is what you get: if you leave off function, mere DNA fits your silly claim.