New find: Bare Breasted Female Statue Harms Minors.

[Revoltingest]

What's wrong with a fetish? I like women's hips.

Nothing "wrong" with either.

The wide appeal is rather cultural, from what I gather. Nothing wrong with that, but I find the debates fun when it comes to the sex appeal of breasts as biological. I find it funny when people try to explain their love of breasts as a biological trait, and that all people who are attracted to women have that same pervy desire.
Why try so hard to say you can't help it?

Huh? Why would anyone want to justify liking jugs?
It's just what is.

Why think fetishizing breasts is somehow a bad thing?

The word "fetish" doesn't seem to apply for most men....we just like'm.

Perhaps cultures where dirty pillows arn't so appreciated are the ones in error.

 

[MysticSang'ha]

Nothing "wrong" with either.


Huh? Why would anyone want to justify liking jugs?
It's just what is.


The word "fetish" doesn't seem to apply for most men....we just like'm.

Perhaps cultures where dirty pillows arn't so appreciated are the ones in error.

Not all heterosexual men around the world become aroused by the sight or thought of breasts. That's all I'm saying.

 

[Revoltingest]

Not all heterosexual men around the world become aroused by the sight or thought of breasts. That's all I'm saying.

Those poor fellows!

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Sometimes I'm just so ashamed to be American.

 

[psychoslice]

When you hide something fro kids they will then grow up want to find out what it is no matter what, if we weren't told they are dirty when young we would then grow up not so concerned about them, just like native women walk around with them showing and no one takes any notice.

 

[Me Myself]

To be fair, I am speaking of breasts, not of any sexual parts. The sexual parts of a woman are well below the breasts.

We are speaking of sexual arousal, not reproduction.

All women's body parts and attitudes are seen as sexy in one point or another by some person or another.

A beautiful face is extremely sexy for a lot or most men, for if you didnt know it.

As I said, the problem is not that the boobs are looked as sexy, but that ey are looked as ONLY sexy and that sex and sexy are looked at as sinful or bad.

Those two are the real main problems,

 

[Me Myself]

Sometimes I'm just so ashamed to be American.

I think you mean north american, but I could be wrong,

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I think you mean north american, but I could be wrong,

Funny.

 

[Me Myself]

So do nice hands or feet. They can be fetishized too.

Absolutely.

I think I ll miss your old avatar BTW, I mean yourew one is cool and I truly dig blue, but the old one was my first association with your username.

 

[MysticSang'ha]

Absolutely.

I think I ll miss your old avatar BTW, I mean yourew one is cool and I truly dig blue, but the old one was my first association with your username.

This is my third incarnation. My first was a Buddha avatar. I guess every few years I decide to shed my skin and adopt a new image here at RF.

 

[Revoltingest]

This is my third incarnation. My first was a Buddha avatar. I guess every few years I decide to shed my skin and adopt a new image here at RF.

Your change inspired me to temporarily adopt a check-out-Willie's-fine-knockers avatar!
I hope it doesn't frighten any children.

 

[Nyingjé Tso]

Vanakkam

You raise the question: is my avatar harmful to people here ? D:
I mean, there is a female breast AND a male torso ! Sir, I made a combo !

 

[Jiggerj]

You make a good point here.

I wonder if some of the objection to the statue might also be that there is no head, mostly just naked body parts. I can see people feeling like it is objectifying women, portraying women as only their bodies, since the head is missing.

I guess we all see different things in art. Any depiction of humans with deliberately missing limbs is a suggestion of violence to me. And of an acceptance of violence.

Just a few months ago there was an outrage over a display of sexuality in a commercial that aired in the morning (when little kids watch TV the most). I don't condone this, but those that found this sexuality offensive probably took their kids to see the new superman movie, knowing full well there would be extreme violence and death.

Why don't people get it? If we can't get rid of both (sex and violence) in movies and on TV, when it comes to children viewing this stuff, sexuality may be objectionable but violence is not acceptable on ANY level.

 

[Father Heathen]

Not all heterosexual men around the world become aroused by the sight or thought of breasts. That's all I'm saying.

I'm sure the average heterosexual man, regardless of nationality, find breasts to be titillating (lolpun), just like legs, hips, butt, lips, feet, or any other part of the body. What is cultural however is the emphasis/obsession surrounding breasts due to the whole "taboo" attitude towards it.

There is also this: New Theory on Why Men Love Breasts | Breast Evolution | LiveScience

 

[Skwim]

I'm sure the average heterosexual man, regardless of nationality, find breasts to be titillating (lolpun), just like legs, hips, butt, lips, feet, or any other part of the body. What is cultural however is the emphasis/obsession surrounding breasts due to the whole "taboo" attitude towards it.

There is also this: New Theory on Why Men Love Breasts | Breast Evolution | LiveScience

But it doesn't explain a thing about why "men love breasts." At best it simply tells us why women like them.

"When a woman's nipples are stimulated during breast-feeding, the neurochemical oxytocin, otherwise known as the "love drug," floods her brain, helping to focus her attention and affection on her baby. But research over the past few years has shown that in humans, this circuitry isn't reserved for exclusive use by infants."

​

 

[Father Heathen]

But it doesn't explain a thing about why "men love breasts." At best it simply tells us why women like them.

"When a woman's nipples are stimulated during breast-feeding, the neurochemical oxytocin, otherwise known as the "love drug," floods her brain, helping to focus her attention and affection on her baby. But research over the past few years has shown that in humans, this circuitry isn't reserved for exclusive use by infants."

​

Maybe it's an evolutionary thing; desiring mates with good feeding potential for offspring?

 

[Sir Doom]

The piece is called, "Accept or Reject" and when I look at it, I can see that it is a woman holding a digital camera with the lens pointed at her chest. The disjointed limbs and missing head are cut off in such away that suggests to me that this is what would appear in the photograph she is taking. Obviously, this is just my interpretation, but I think its intended as commentary on the rise of sexual objectification due to the widespread use of digital media.

I could be wrong, though.

 

[Father Heathen]

The piece is called, "Accept or Reject" and when I look at it, I can see that it is a woman holding a digital camera with the lens pointed at her chest. The disjointed limbs and missing head are cut off in such away that suggests to me that this is what would appear in the photograph she is taking. Obviously, this is just my interpretation, but I think its intended as commentary on the rise of sexual objectification due to the widespread use of digital media.

I could be wrong, though.

I believe you're right, which makes the fundies campaign all the more ironic.

 

[Revoltingest]

But it doesn't explain a thing about why "men love breasts." At best it simply tells us why women like them.

I'm sure there's an evolutionary biological "why" underlying their appeal.
Fortunately, one needn't study any biology to feel the appeal of headlights.

 

[Sir Doom]

I believe you're right, which makes the fundies campaign all the more ironic.

Agreed. They can't see the forest for the trees, apparently. But that's pretty common for fundamentalists.