Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Now I am not going to validate this video. All I'm saying is if it's true seems there could be a problem.
I can't see a significant number of people spending hundreds or possibly thousands of dollars to travel to other states and vote in their primaries. It's possible some people did that, but I doubt it happened to a degree needed to influence the numbers.
These voter fraud conspiracies don't make any sense to me. If there's a problem with voting in our country, it's that not enough people are voting at least once, not that people are voting too often.
You can't conceive a political party operative busing in a couple of hundred people to try and influence the vote?
Do you have a political affiliation?
What does that have to do with the video posted? You might notice that I said " Now I am not going to validate this video. All I'm saying is if it's true seems there could be a problem."
What does that have to do with the video posted? You might notice that I said " Now I am not going to validate this video. All I'm saying is if it's true seems there could be a problem."
OK ConservativeOh I was just curious.
OK Conservative
Hmmm, and my Avatar doesn't give you a hint?On the American spectrum or the European spectrum?
Didn't want to assume.Hmmm, and my Avatar doesn't give you a hint?
Sounds reasonable, U.S. style conservative.Didn't want to assume.
No, there were a few hundred thousand primary voters in New Hampshire, so it would take a couple hundred busloads of people to influence the vote by even a single percentage point. So you're looking at busing in a few thousand people per percentage point.You can't conceive a political party operative busing in a couple of hundred people to try and influence the vote?
No I can't. It all comes down to risk vs.reward. The chance of it paying off is low. And the chance of it becoming a national news story that decimates your campaign is high.
No, there were a few hundred thousand primary voters in New Hampshire, so it would take a couple hundred busloads of people to influence the vote by even a single percentage point. So you're looking at busing in a few thousand people per percentage point.
It's like @Underhill said, the risk/rewards aren't worth it. If a candidate is caught doing this with even one person, let alone a thousand, it would be catastrophic to their campaign. And if even one of these people couldn't keep their mouth shut the whole plan would fail. The money would be better spent registering and busing in actual residents to the polls, and it's good publicity for them.
So how much voter fraud are you willing to overlook; especially if it is not in favor or your candidate?
Voter fraud happens. But it's very insignificant. Even in places with small populations it would take hundreds of people committing voter fraud to throw an election, and people would notice very quickly. In larger populated areas, you would need thousands of people to throw an election, which means there would be thousands of problems reported.So how much voter fraud are you willing to overlook; especially if it is not in favor or your candidate?
Sounds reasonable, U.S. style conservative.
Voter fraud happens. But it's very insignificant. Even in places with small populations it would take hundreds of people committing voter fraud to throw an election, and people would notice very quickly. In larger populated areas, you would need thousands of people to throw an election, which means there would be thousands of problems reported.
It would take a large and elaborate organized event to pull something off, and even with the best planning the risks of getting caught and getting away with it are just too high.