New 'on-line museum' challenges evolution

[Noaidi]

WAU - Home

Another biblically-based effort challenging 'Darwinian evolution' and promoting the 'theory in crisis' lies. This one is aimed at school-level students.

Slick presentation, good photographs, easy to navigate. Creationists will love it.

 

[Amill]

This is the most honest site I've seen questioning evolution actually(I don't look at many). I haven't really seen many straw-mans and I haven't seen the word God anywhere. I doesn't bother me too much

 

[angellous_evangellous]

WAU - Home

Another biblically-based effort challenging 'Darwinian evolution' and promoting the 'theory in crisis' lies. This one is aimed at school-level students.

Slick presentation, good photographs, easy to navigate. Creationists will love it.

Are you kidding?

A 12yr old could have created this site with minimal effort on an iPad.

 

[Revoltingest]

WAU - Home
Another biblically-based effort challenging 'Darwinian evolution' and promoting the 'theory in crisis' lies. This one is aimed at school-level students.
Slick presentation, good photographs, easy to navigate. Creationists will love it.

Alas, yet another organization which claims evolution is mathematically highly improbable....without actually showing their calculations.
Sounds like a religion in "paradigm crisis", to use their favorite phrase.

 

[Man of Faith]

You are right I love it. Thanks for the link.

 

[angellous_evangellous]

You are right I love it. Thanks for the link.

:biglaugh:

Tell us if it's better than AiG.

 

[Noaidi]

Have a look at the reference list at the foot of each section. Most of the publications are pretty dated.

 

[Noaidi]

You are right I love it. Thanks for the link.

What do you like about it?

 

[Noaidi]

Are you kidding?

A 12yr old could have created this site with minimal effort on an iPad.

Exactly. It's designed for school kids, so in terms of presentation, it's appealing.

 

[angellous_evangellous]

Exactly. It's designed for school kids, so in terms of presentation, it's appealing.

No Tellitubbies.

 

[Man of Faith]

What do you like about it?

Whatever you don't like about it is probably what I like about it.

 

[Noaidi]

Whatever you don't like about it is probably what I like about it.

Can you be more specific? As a biology teacher, I'm interested in what people like about creationist education sites such as these.

 

[Man of Faith]

Can you be more specific? As a biology teacher, I'm interested in what people like about creationist education sites such as these.

Well the OP is very unspecific so I assumed this was an unspecific thread. The bottom line is I am a creationist so I like creationists sites, it's that simple.

 

[Noaidi]

Well the OP is very unspecific so I assumed this was an unspecific thread. The bottom line is I am a creationist so I like creationists sites, it's that simple.

My OP was to highlight another creationist website regurgitating the 'evolution in crisis' line. I was interested in what you, as a creationist, finds appealing about it. Did you find the information factual? Did you find it represented your views?

I'm just curious, that's all.

 

[Man of Faith]

My OP was to highlight another creationist website regurgitating the 'evolution in crisis' line. I was interested in what you, as a creationist, finds appealing about it. Did you find the information factual? Did you find it represented your views?

I'm just curious, that's all.

I just like the site because it is a creationist site like I said. I already know that what we observe doesn't match up to what evolution claims happens. I didn't go though the whole site but from what I read it looks truthful and factful.

I think that teaching, in relation to evolution, should stick to evidence based, not imaginary based information like Darwinian evolution.

 

[Mr Spinkles]

I appreciate the OP but I decided not to click on the link. I've seen it all before, and I don't want to give these sites any extra hits.

 

[Tristesse]

I just like the site because it is a creationist site like I said. I already know that what we observe doesn't match up to what evolution claims happens. I didn't go though the whole site but from what I read it looks truthful and factful.

I think that teaching, in relation to evolution, should stick to evidence based, not imaginary based information like Darwinian evolution.

I agree, evolution should stick to evidence based claims, which it does. Do you mind expounding on what you mean by "imaginary based information?" And factful isn't a word, I think you mean factual.

 

[angellous_evangellous]

I just like the site because it is a creationist site like I said. I already know that what we observe doesn't match up to what evolution claims happens. I didn't go though the whole site but from what I read it looks truthful and factful.

I think that teaching, in relation to evolution, should stick to evidence based, not imaginary based information like Darwinian evolution.

The real problem isn't evidence. Both sides can look at the Grandcanyon, fossils, and other parts of nature. The problem is interpretation. The theory of evolution has best explained every aspect of the natural world, from bacteria to bugs to every other living creature on earth. The best that creationism can do is look at the world and marvel at God's creation, which they could do anyway if they knew anything about natural science.

Creationists do quite often misrepresent, lie, or fabricate 'evidence,' and we don't want to honor this dishonesty by teaching it to our kids.

 

[Man of Faith]

I agree, evolution should stick to evidence based claims, which it does. Do you mind expounding on what you mean by "imaginary based information?" And factful isn't a word, I think you mean factual.

Common ancestry is imaginary based information.

 

[Tristesse]

Common ancestry is philosophy not factual.

Actually, no. It is factual. And what common ancestry are you referring to? Because, we're related to all living things on the face of the earth, apes just happen to be some of our closer relatives.