• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

New Study: Trump Supporters More Likely than Other Groups to Consume Fake News

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
University of Oxford project finds Trump supporters consume largest volume of ‘junk news’ on Facebook and Twitter

Trump Supporters Spread the Majority of Phony News on Social Media

Study suggests Trump supporters more likely to consume, share, and promote fake news than other groups. Of course, a single study is seldom conclusive. More research needs to be done on this. But the result is intriguing. It might help explain why Trump supporters often seem so out of touch with reality.

Comments? Rants? Denials of reality?
 

Kuzcotopia

If you can read this, you are as lucky as I am.
There are definitely bubbles that social media puts around everyone. But not all bubbles are the same, and each one has to be evaluated independently.

Not sure I am surprised by this. Every time I hear the phrase "Deep State" for example, I am reminded how mainstream that language has become in about a third of the IS population.

Obama warned the Republicans many years ago about their unwillingness to strongly reject the more outlandish claims during his presidency . . . like the birther movement, his religious faith, or the many spurious claims about his positions (like "he'll take away all our guns", etc.).

But now they have to bow to a guy* who claims things like, for example, millions voted illegally in 2016. Fox runs with it, social media is awash with it, and the point is debated and refuted by cooler heads. Trump starts a commission based on no evidence, finds no evidence, and quietly disbands the commission.

But nevertheless, a third of the country still believes his claim is true, because of that strange social media feedback loop. . . it's a single unforgivable example of how this admistraion fails to live to to any decent standards of actual reality, and how these lies are deliberately propagated and spread through social media.

Another example: At this moment, a claim of Joe Arpiro's current Senate campaign is that Obama was never a citizen. . . Think about how many people in the US believe that right now, and how easy a unified republican voice could easily dispel it for all but the crackpots.

It also explains how easily the next conspiracy theory starts, such as a literal attack on the FBI as an insitution, because now all of it's Trump-appointed Republicans in leadership positions are suddenly part of a liberal deep state.

You can't make up anything crazier. . . And the lost third of this country sees it every single day when they glance at their phone. . . How on earth do we fix this?

* actually, they don't have to bow to him. I fail to understand why they do. . . They got the tax cuts, so why support someone so toxic? *shrug*
 

Vouthon

Dominus Deus tuus ignis consumens est
Premium Member
Well blow me down with a feather duster :eek:

Who'd have thought it? ;)

Any chance they might conduct the same study using Brexit-supporters here in the UK?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Several years ago I read of three previous studies that found that those who get most of their news from Fox actually know less about real world events than those who do not watch t.v. news at all or only rarely do. As people by now should be well aware of, Fox was created purposely by Murdock to be a "conservative oriented" news channel. Last time I heard, real news is neither "conservative" nor "liberal".

BTW, in at least one of those studies, even those who largely watch MSNBC to get their news were pretty much on par with the other networks, all of which ranked higher in knowledge of world events than those who watch Fox. .
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Of course they spread the most fake news, conspiracy theories and propaganda. Just look at where they get their information from.
Climate change is a hoax!!!!!!!!!!! Because Big Oil tells me it is!
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
University of Oxford project finds Trump supporters consume largest volume of ‘junk news’ on Facebook and Twitter

Trump Supporters Spread the Majority of Phony News on Social Media

Study suggests Trump supporters more likely to consume, share, and promote fake news than other groups. Of course, a single study is seldom conclusive. More research needs to be done on this. But the result is intriguing. It might help explain why Trump supporters often seem so out of touch with reality.

Comments? Rants? Denials of reality?

I can only answer from personal observation. I disagree with this from my own contact with the public (of which I have a lot). I think there are plenty of people on both sides (I'm talking the more extreme of those sides) that are willing to accept anything that is reported negative about the other side no matter how ridiculous or biased it may be. I don't think the right or left has a monopoly on this.
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
University of Oxford project finds Trump supporters consume largest volume of ‘junk news’ on Facebook and Twitter

Trump Supporters Spread the Majority of Phony News on Social Media

Study suggests Trump supporters more likely to consume, share, and promote fake news than other groups. Of course, a single study is seldom conclusive. More research needs to be done on this. But the result is intriguing. It might help explain why Trump supporters often seem so out of touch with reality.

Comments? Rants? Denials of reality?
This is why I stick to the National Enquirer for all my news.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
This is why I stick to the National Enquirer for all my news.

Personally, I find this one much more reliable.
bigfoot.jpg
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Personally, I find this one much more reliable.
View attachment 20285
We know this from the documentary, Men In Black.

I just heard some fake news on NPR this morning on my way to the dentist.
The host announced that Sessions wants more drug prosecutions because
he & his friends are invested in private prisons. Fortunately, a guest on the
show offered a better theory for backpedalling on drug law liberalization, ie,
that Sessions is an old school, law & order prohibition type who is just out of
step with the times. Anyway, the host offered no evidence for this ambitious
claim, but there it was.....news....a hyperbolic personal opinion proffered as fact.

Note:
I know that "fake news" once had a narrower definition which was based on
intent to mislead with a complete fabrication. But I'm trying to get on board
with the up to date usage of the term.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
I can only answer from personal observation. I disagree with this from my own contact with the public (of which I have a lot). I think there are plenty of people on both sides (I'm talking the more extreme of those sides) that are willing to accept anything that is reported negative about the other side no matter how ridiculous or biased it may be. I don't think the right or left has a monopoly on this.
There are wingnut anti-vaxxers on the left, to be sure. But from what I can see the study was more general than the utter extreme folk.
 
Top