Smoke
Done here.
With no keyboard. The only appeal the iPad holds for me personally is that I'm a genealogist, and if it has adequate handwriting recognition software it would be useful for taking notes while standing. (For instance, making cemetery surveys.) And I can do that with a handheld that's cheaper and easier to carry. In most circumstances, I greatly prefer a computer with a keyboard.I think it's more than likely that the Apple Ipad's entry level will kill market shares for Kindle and it's higher priced models will appeal more to laptop users looking for streamlined platforms or as alternative to users whose budgets can't afford the cheapest MAC starting at $1000. The demographic for Kindle is the same type of demographic for the IPAD. Apple products are uniquely intuitive in user friendly applications so even older customers will find it more than accessible. Why wouldn't a potential Kindle customer (who has $250 to blow on a device that's primarily an e-book) spend a few hundred more instead on a device that will also replace their laptop?
Worst case scenario, it's the cheapest Apple laptop.
Given that I'm always going to want a laptop or netbook with a keyboard for everyday use, am I going to want a more expensive, heavier, harder to read iPad with a much shorter battery life to use as a reader? No. It's not an adequate replacement for my laptop or for the Kindle.
I agree, and I just like reading books better. It's what I'm used to. But the ability to conveniently carry a lot of books and a battery life of up to a week hold significant appeal.meh, i still like buying books in print. Having a book I can read when the power goes out, or while at the beach is something you cant ever replace electronically, LoL.