cladking
Well-Known Member
I'm the last one to say what the ancients didn't know. But ancient science can be reconstructed from deduction alone and I believe it is critical that we do exactly this. Meanwhile there is a shortcut because the "Book of Thot" (all human knowledge) is inscribed on the walls surrounding the second Sphinx under the NE corner of the Great Pyramid. It is simply critical that this project begin just in case I'm wrong about what's under the pyramid. There is no question they had advanced knowledge and some most surprising technology. I believe their cosmological knowledge was derived from different premises but is probably fairly accurate in terms of those premises. There are significant anomalous facts in my understanding of their science and how it operated. I've barely begun working on the science and can't make much progress until I better understand their math which might be better called "manipulatable digitized reality". I do believe the sky of the southern hemisphere are important to its creation but the chief means by which they were able to crack all this was the existence of the moon and its effects on earth.
I just haven't researched myth and the like. Coming at it from the other direction I can see ancient ideas and events that produced a few myths. You're way ahead of me on all this stuff. As far as modern cosmology I agree that we've lost our way and believe it's because we've come to mistake the Quantified Logic of math for the Manifested Logic of reality. Math and reality are wholly distinct but seem to be the same thing because they are both based in logic. Math is wholly an abstraction while reality is wholly not an abstraction.
Ancient math was Representative Logic.
