Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
What do we call someone that is not a scientist and believes in and promotes evolution?
Educated.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do we call someone that is not a scientist and believes in and promotes evolution?
We need to pull all the creationists off the streets because if they can't think rationally, they are a danger to the commnity. Not to mention though that they built this country into the greatest in the world.
Educated.
And what do you call a creationist with a Phd?
And what do you call a creationist with a Phd?
Let me make sure I understand this. I've been in electronics all my life, worked on radar tracking systems, graduated with 4.0 in college, raised two kids, married, gotten great reviews from my employers and the whole time I was irrational?
Let me make sure I understand this. I've been in electronics all my life, worked on radar tracking systems, graduated with 4.0 in college, raised two kids, married, gotten great reviews from my employers and the whole time I was irrational?
I wonder if any evolutionists went to a doctor that believed in creation and they operated on them? Wow, irrational with a scaple working on them.
wait, does Kent Hovind actually have a Phd, or is that just yet again another one of his lies?
Kent Hovind
wait, does Kent Hovind actually have a Phd, or is that just yet again another one of his lies?
Cognitive irrelevance is usually not a problem for most people.Let me make sure I understand this. I've been in electronics all my life, worked on radar tracking systems, graduated with 4.0 in college, raised two kids, married, gotten great reviews from my employers and the whole time I was irrational?
I wonder if any evolutionists went to a doctor that believed in creation and they operated on them? Wow, irrational with a scaple working on them.
Not necessarily. It depends what your exposure has been to biology and evolutionary science. It is irrational to hold a belief despite overwhelming contradictory evidence, but I can't say whether you've examined the evidence. It's not necessarily irrational to hold a belief that's unsupported but unchallenged.Let me make sure I understand this. I've been in electronics all my life, worked on radar tracking systems, graduated with 4.0 in college, raised two kids, married, gotten great reviews from my employers and the whole time I was irrational?
I'd be worried, since a doctor who doesn't believe in evolution also misunderstands issues that are very relevant to medicine today... antibiotic resistant bacteria, for instance.I wonder if any evolutionists went to a doctor that believed in creation and they operated on them? Wow, irrational with a scaple working on them.
wait, does Kent Hovind actually have a Phd, or is that just yet again another one of his lies?
It doesn't matter if you had a 4.7, and yes you can get a 4.7. Most creationists are rational in every other aspect of their life, except this one. For instance if I told you I just bought a new dog, you could probably take me at my word. It wouldn't need much convincing. Because you know dogs exist and you know people keep them as pets. Plus it's not that important whether or not I lied about something so trivial. However, if I told you I just bought a new fire breathing dragon, I would suspect you would want more evidence that just my word. Because have you ever seen a real fire breathing dragon? And if I started saying things like, "oh, well, my dragon is invisible and only I can see him." You would probably doubt that I had a fire breathing dragon at all. See, ad thats a case where you would ask for rational types of evidence, I'm sure. But, when it comes to matters of the bible, it just seems like there is no amount of evidence that could ever convince a creationist, they are just irrational in that mind set.
That is different than if millions of people believed in fire breathing dragons, and had experiences with salvation through faith in a fire breathing dragon that came to earth in the appearance of a man and died on a cross for our sins. Most evolutionists that I have seen believe there could be aliens, yet we can't see them. Rational?
That is because the existence of aliens is logically coherent, whereas no one has yet to provide a logically coherent definition of any possible creator.Most evolutionists that I have seen believe there could be aliens, yet we can't see them. Rational?
Replace "died on a cross for our sins" with "saved the lives of many sailors in exchange for human sacrifice" and that'd be pretty darn close to Watatsumi, the Japanese dragon sea-god. Millions of people believed in Watatsumi. You can still find Shinto shrines to him.That is different than if millions of people believed in fire breathing dragons, and had experiences with salvation through faith in a fire breathing dragon that came to earth in the appearance of a man and died on a cross for our sins.
Depends what you mean by "believe there could be aliens". Are you talking "believe that life may exist on other planets", or are you talking "believe that the crop circle that appeared in Jeb's field last week was probably made by little green men"?Most evolutionists that I have seen believe there could be aliens, yet we can't see them. Rational?
What do we call someone that is not a scientist and believes in and promotes evolution?