Noah's Ark Flood Theories

[questionabound]

To begin , all ancient scriptures were written after noah landed , so the story is brought forward by those on the ark . As far as I have read , the judement is still out on when the Book Of Enoch was written but it is instrumental . You have to read Islam's version of noah's ark . It states the evil one was aboard as well as others besides noah and family . Why should this be believed ? It also states OG was on the ark and Islam , Hebrew and Catholic bibles attest to his existence , that he is a nephilim , (Book Of Enoch) , and that he lived and was alive until Moses killed him . This event , how many years after the ark landed ? There is much discussion of his age but is pondered 3000 years old and this does not take into account his age before the flood for that is unknown . The evil one on the ark ? Among all on the ark , who would know of writing ? The evil one on the ark , look at the story of noah after the ark landed . What's left to wonder , if indeed the flood was an act of GOD ? I for one have never believed GOD killed . He showed mercy to Adam and Eve after they sinned . Although he banished the evil one , he did not kill it , not did he kill Cain after his the greatest sin . For this reason , I do not believe the flood an act of GOD , GOD has never killed , but the event did take place , I take OG as the proof , but proof does not end here , there's more to discuss . The evil one , his only desire to destroy GOD's creation and to lead mankind away from GOD , what better way than to make man think GOD killed ?

 

[questionabound]

I have a question for all . Genesis 1 - 2:3 speaks of GOD as only GOD . Genesis 2:4 begins lord god . Anyone have a clue why ?

 

[footprints]

Can you link me to your post please, its well buried in this thread.

Darkendless, if you are truly interested you will find it. If you are not interested you won't even look.

 

[footprints]

I bet you could not have passed a breathalyzer test when you came up with that comment.

And I bet you couldn't have passed an IQ test when you came up with your comment.

 

[Vile Atheist]

LOL I just laugh when people deny evidence in order to support their fantasies. No I was talking about you pertaining to not so intelligent, just another thing you have wrong.

What evidence have I denied? What little you've presented is easily debunked. And it has been already.

My fantasy is reality? Great.

So when are you going to stop trolling and start presenting substance?

 

[footprints]

What evidence have I denied? What little you've presented is easily debunked. And it has been already.

Every little bit that doesn't suit your own belief pattern. All the rest says, I am most probably on the right track if you believe it is debunked.

My fantasy is reality? Great.

Yeah I know, all mental inpatients say the same thing.

So when are you going to stop trolling and start presenting substance?

When somebody of substance wants to discuss, debate an issue, in the same way I always do. Else I am just left with trolls like you to condend with.

 

[Vile Atheist]

Lmao. Right. Well when you find evidence, kindly present it, please. Until then, I have no further interest in maintaining dialogue with you.

 

[Autodidact]

So when are you going to stop trolling and start presenting substance?

 

[darkendless]

What evidence have I denied? What little you've presented is easily debunked. And it has been already.

My fantasy is reality? Great.

So when are you going to stop trolling and start presenting substance?

Yeh im getting sick of it.

Having participated in many such threads my ability to be tolerant of such people is wearing thin. I don't have the desire to continually explain myself like i used to.

 

[questionabound]

Have thought the Wikipedia a very resourseful outlet of information supplied by those who are top and well beyond me for I am definately no scholar . If what is written there are lies , no one has edited the info. to state such . Please join and correct it ! Nothing I stated above can not be found in the reading of it and the bibles of three religions , only . two omit the evil one , others and OG in the story of the ark . Have any archeologist's pre-dated any scriptures before the flood ? I have not found any info , maybe your reading can tell me better . That's why I'm here , answers to what I have read . You want page numbers , everything above in all three bibles , Wiki , read for yourself , only info. I have to go by . The Wikipedia is excellent , you can edit any info. there , if you know and can prove better , please do .

 

[footprints]

Lmao. Right. Well when you find evidence, kindly present it, please. Until then, I have no further interest in maintaining dialogue with you.

In that case I do not have to put up with rubbish from you, that is a blessing.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Have any archeologist's pre-dated any scriptures before the flood ? I have not found any info , maybe your reading can tell me better .

That depends: what date do you give for the flood?

Apparently, the oldest known examples of writing are stone carvings from 3300 - 3200 BCE.

And while they're not "scriptures" per se, there are many cave paintings in Europe that date back more than 10,000 years.