sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
What do you base this on?Certianly there is reason to believ early civilizations based themselves near rivers and when they flooded this may have seemed global to them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you base this on?Certianly there is reason to believ early civilizations based themselves near rivers and when they flooded this may have seemed global to them.
Well look at the States. Pretty much any city of size has water running through it or near it. How do you think that happened? Better yet, why do you think that is?What do you base this on?
What do you base this on?
How did they fit a pair of Brontosaurus on the ark? Where do these lifeforms fit into the Bible? I've not seen a reference.
So, modern hunter-gatherers believe local floods to be global?This is based on archaeological and sociology records as they pertain to investigating hunters and gatherers still in existance to date.
So, modern hunter-gatherers believe local floods to be global?
There is also a very interesting scenerio. Did you know that there has been found skeletons of what were supposed to be prehistoric beasts that have not fully turned to stone, fossilized.
This means that it is possible that some of the great monsters were alive at the time of Noah. The flood came 1,656 years after Adam was created, or the year 2370BC. Adam was created in 4026BC.
The flood came 1,656 years after Adam was created, or the year 2370BC. Adam was created in 4026BC.
That's far too logical, silly!!:slap: You really need to work on your imagination!:yes:So again, why did the Egyptians, Chinese and others fail to notice that they were under water?
They did notice it.So again, why did the Egyptians, Chinese and others fail to notice that they were under water?
So again, why did the Egyptians, Chinese and others fail to notice that they were under water?
No you must be mistakin Mestemia, they were no where near de nile.They did notice it.
They are just in denial...
Yeah, well I never was any good at geometry...:no:No you must be mistakin Mestemia, they were no where near de nile.
Hmmm the Chinese that is...
Maybe they were paid to keep quiet - cash on denial.They did notice it.
They are just in denial...
O.K. great. So why didn't any of the civilizations that kept written records during that period notice that they were underwater?
Who needs dated documents? The simple continuity of ancient civilisations is enough. Don't you think that the complete extermination of, say, Egyptian civilisation, and its re-starting by presumed descendants of Noah, would have left just the teeniest archaeological blip? There has been a city on the site of Jericho since about 8000 BCE: why are there no traces of its inundation by floodwater?And I'm sure you have such documents, duly dated Jan 15, 2370?
The familiar burden of evidence error. No-one has to provide evidence against the flood; we need only point out the complete absence of evidence for it - evidence which, if the flood actually happened, should be abundant.Upon examination, the 'evidence' against a global flood does not hold up.
LOL me needder.Yeah, well I never was any good at geometry...:no:
Who needs dated documents? The simple continuity of ancient civilisations is enough. Don't you think that the complete extermination of, say, Egyptian civilisation, and its re-starting by presumed descendants of Noah, would have left just the teeniest archaeological blip? There has been a city on the site of Jericho since about 8000 BCE: why are there no traces of its inundation by floodwater?
The familiar burden of evidence error. No-one has to provide evidence against the flood; we need only point out the complete absence of evidence for it - evidence which, if the flood actually happened, should be abundant.
Now Auto, under any sort of reasoned argument or position, I cannot rationally, nor logically say a deity exists or doesn't exist, nor could you if you maintain a reasoned position. For a person of Faith, they will have an answer one way or the other, that either a deity exists or a deity doesn't exist.
Now let us assume that the people who put their faith in a deity exists, are correct. According to some, this deity is all powerful, capable of anything. Certainly removing any evidence of a litteral world wide flood, wouldn't be a problem to a deity who could do anything. As the story goes, all but Noah and family were wiped out, so how would anybody know if a flood occured or not. For a deity capable of anything, replacing the population of the world after such a flood, would be a piece of cake, correcting a mistake, the bible doesn't say this didn't happen.