Non-religious term for god

[rational experiences]

As a human thinking being the basic science concept if I said God I personally would be defining the concept.

If I said spirit in science I would quote a gas as compared to physical mass.

If I said no man is God as Hu man then I would have meant it.

If I said God is the creator my conscious aware theism would quote movement

As the heavenly spirit moves.

So i would symbolic conceptualize movement. Expressing symbolism itself as a human thinker.

O planet a circle. Fixed by mass.

Heavens surrounds as spirit movement circular.

So describing would give God an O thesis.

O movement of spirit in heavens also flows.

I would quote O moves in down form G spiralling from O that description.

Spirit movement as a body. The heavens.

Then D as O split would quote movement in circulating body splits

How the heavens moves it body form spiritually as O.....G O D.

An explanation.

Why I would quote no man is God and meant it.

 

[Ehav4Ever]

What is a scientific term for the word god?
Sorry for using mystical terms-culture thing.

One of the problems that you may face with the question is in defining what a god means in the first place. For example, for someone people a god is only something that they pray to. Nothing more and nothing less. So a scentific term for that could be, "something that someone prays to - nothing more and nothing less."

If a person intends that a god is a human looking being that has a beard and sits on an actual throne somewhere in a heavenly realm and expects humans to have faith, or else, a scientific term that could be used is, "irrelevant until proven to be the case using a method like the scientific method. I.e. repeatability using verifiable measures."

If one intends that a god is not human, in any way, and is the sole source that caused reality/the universe/multi-verse and all aspects of such to exist then a scientific term could be, "the source of reality/all things/the universe/multi-verse, and everything in them and everything that composes their structure, etc."

I.e. a so-called scientific term would simply be a description of what it is theorized or proven to be and such terms are at the discretion of people and not the disciplines of science themselves.

Since the disciplines are concepts created, discovered, and defined by people based on observation and/or experimentation of the natural world/universe the terms are also defined by people and not by "science" since science is also a term is really a concept(s) to begin with.

I hope that helps.

 

[Martin]

Ha. I don't know that either.

Just stick with "God" then. It seems like everybody has their own ideas about what the word represents, so just treat it as a placeholder for your own interpretation.

 

[oldbadger]

.
Non-religious term for god

Nature?
Mother Nature?

 

[Wrangler]

Not according to the links I gave.

I’m afraid you are moving the goal posts. I was talking about the implications of the Scientific theory known as the Big Bang and how it got atheist scientists into a pickle as it supported Creation.

I am not talking about recent addendums, such as multiverse theories in atheist scientists desperate attempt to speculate a beginning beyond their own data.

An eternal universe went out of scientific favor before the Kennedy Administration.

 

[McBell]

Not according to the links I gave.

The big bang started with an atom. What is the first cause of that atom?

I’m afraid you are moving the goal posts. I was talking about the implications of the Scientific theory known as the Big Bang and how it got atheist scientists into a pickle as it supported Creation.

I am not talking about recent addendums, such as multiverse theories in atheist scientists desperate attempt to speculate a beginning beyond their own data.

An eternal universe went out of scientific favor before the Kennedy Administration.

Your blatant avoidance is most interesting.

 

[Marcion]

A scientific way of describing God is the Cosmic or Supreme Consciousness.
The universe is a projection, a thought creation within the Supreme Consciousness and elementary particals are a kind of condensed consciousness.

So God is the Supreme Subject and we all are His object and His thought projections.

Another way of explaining God is Generator Operator Destructor. G.O.D. is the one who brings forth everything, who sustains it for some limited period of time and who destroys or withdraws it all.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

One of the problems that you may face with the question is in defining what a god means in the first place. For example, for someone people a god is only something that they pray to. Nothing more and nothing less. So a scentific term for that could be, "something that someone prays to - nothing more and nothing less."

If a person intends that a god is a human looking being that has a beard and sits on an actual throne somewhere in a heavenly realm and expects humans to have faith, or else, a scientific term that could be used is, "irrelevant until proven to be the case using a method like the scientific method. I.e. repeatability using verifiable measures."

If one intends that a god is not human, in any way, and is the sole source that caused reality/the universe/multi-verse and all aspects of such to exist then a scientific term could be, "the source of reality/all things/the universe/multi-verse, and everything in them and everything that composes their structure, etc."

I.e. a so-called scientific term would simply be a description of what it is theorized or proven to be and such terms are at the discretion of people and not the disciplines of science themselves.

Since the disciplines are concepts created, discovered, and defined by people based on observation and/or experimentation of the natural world/universe the terms are also defined by people and not by "science" since science is also a term is really a concept(s) to begin with.

I hope that helps.

The definition of god is in the OP.

I put the definition there on purpose so the OP would be answered from that perspective rather than debate about god doesn't exist or whose definition is correct....

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Just stick with "God" then. It seems like everybody has their own ideas about what the word represents, so just treat it as a placeholder for your own interpretation.

That doesn't make sense. I was actually curious of the answer per conversation on RF. What god is beyond that is irrelevant.

Are you able to answer the question?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Nature?
Mother Nature?

Physics?

Mother nature is a noun, the OP treats it as a verb, but I was going by the definition in the OP.

 

[Thief]

Wind?

the Jews thought of God in a similar fashion
and they didn't seem to think He had a name

I AM!........is not really a name

 

[Unveiled Artist]

I’m afraid you are moving the goal posts. I was talking about the implications of the Scientific theory known as the Big Bang and how it got atheist scientists into a pickle as it supported Creation.

I am not talking about recent addendums, such as multiverse theories in atheist scientists desperate attempt to speculate a beginning beyond their own data.

An eternal universe went out of scientific favor before the Kennedy Administration.

You mentioned the first cause being the big bang and how the big bang is scientific explanation and evidence that a first cause exists.

I asked to expand on that. The big bang started off with one atom. If it were the first cause as you said it would too have a cause because for you something must have a cause for it to exist.

So going by your statement big bang=first cause, what's the cause of the atom to which the universe then is formed or "created?"

Scientist aren't all atheist anymore a theologist studying the Bible are all christian. Someone's belief in god or lack of is irrelevant to your original point.

No one mentioned multiuniverses. You brought up the big bang, I looked up and found info on it, now I'm asking you what you meant when you compared big bang=first cause.

I'm asking you for clarification of your statement the big bang is scientific evidence for the first cause.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Your blatant avoidance is most interesting.

No sarcasm. How do you know I was avoiding. This is your assumption. Go off facts.

Instead, make a productive comment as to why you think I'm avoiding something since I have no idea what you are thinking.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

the Jews thought of God in a similar fashion
and they didn't seem to think He had a name

I AM!........is not really a name

What was it that went across the water?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

The prevailing scientific theory is called The Big Bang. This scientific theory supports Creation.

Since the big bang started with an atom, what is the cause of that atom if everything that exists has a first cause?

 

[Thief]

What was it that went across the water?

Spirit

see Genesis

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Spirit

see Genesis

Which means?

Different definitions of spirit. Can you describe what spirit is if not the wind?

 

[Thief]

Which means?

Different definitions of spirit. Can you describe what spirit is if not the wind?

similar to that ........which will answer this post

 

[Unveiled Artist]

similar to that ........which will answer this post

Discussions involve asking for clarification. Productive discussions involve active listening. I'm interested in what you mean by spirit?

Do you know?

It's alright if you don't. It's better to say that than leave me and others hanging.

 

[Thief]

Discussions involve asking for clarification. Productive discussions involve active listening. I'm interested in what you mean by spirit?

Do you know?

It's alright if you don't. It's better to say that than leave me and others hanging.

your spirit answered my post

but maybe?.....you think your are not ....spirit