whirlingmerc
Well-Known Member
Honestly, that would be cowardly of me.
You are, after all, trying to defend Trump.
Actually, I do not defend Trump in all he does or says. Nor did I endorse him.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Honestly, that would be cowardly of me.
You are, after all, trying to defend Trump.
This is a most dishonest tactic we see from some in the left.Actually, I do not defend Trump in all he does or says. Nor did I endorse him.
This is a most dishonest tactic we see from the left.
They call anyone who voted for him or doesn't attack
his every policy a "Trump supporter".
They will not recognize that one can support one policy
of his, yet oppose others. Or that if we debunk a false
attack upon him or a policy, that is to "support" him.
It would be a mere mistake on their part had they not
been so often informed of this. Yet they persist.
What changed that made it right then and wrong for Trump? What was so significantly different/
Half million? He'll never get a wall because it won't stop drugs.Did you see where Trump's prototype walls are being torn down for a half million each section??
Half million? He'll never get a wall because it won't stop drugs.
What a silly notion. When did Hillary ever suggest building a wall all across the Southern border?If it were Hillary's wall, I'd expect Democrats to enthusiastically support it.
Consider Democrats' support for the 2006 Secure Fence Act,What a silly notion. When did Hillary ever suggest building a wall all across the Southern border?
They would likely support a classical liberal.That's as nonsensical as stating:
If Trump wanted to appoint a Liberal to the Supreme Court, I'd expect Republicans to enthusiastically support it.
I'll ask again...Consider Democrats' support for the 2006 Secure Fence Act,
& for Obama's advocating increased border security....
You take the term "wall" far more literally than do I, shoe guy.I'll ask again...
What a silly notion. When did Hillary ever suggest building a wall all across the Southern border?
Do I detect the green eyed monster?BTW: I know you are so very proud of your post count. By my calculations, it's about 42 posts per day. There is a new kid in town since Wednesday, who is running at 68 posts per day. Now, he probably doesn't have your staying power, but I just wanted to give you a heads up.
You take the term "wall" far more literally than do I, shoe guy.
Tis merely the name Trump gave his campaign of improving border security.
And I lament sheeples who once supported improved security now oppose it.ecco said: ↑I'll ask again...
What a silly notion. When did Hillary ever suggest building a wall all across the Southern border?
Trump promised a wall across all of the southern border. Neither Clinton nor Obama ever advocated such a thing.
I cannot understand why the sheeples are OK with Trump declaring an emergency to get funding. Why aren't they insisting he fulfill his oft-chanted promise?
FYI There are other things ecco besides shoes. I don't expect you to know.