Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Realistically, any "rogue" leader or determined terrorist group can acquire nuclear weapons. If anything, we should bring hellfire and brimstone down upon those who are not uptight pricks about securely storing nuclear material. Rather than focus on those who may-or-may-not have nuclear weapons, we should focus on MUF and demand the security of any place that handles nuclear material make robbing Vegas or Fort Knox seem like robbing an old defenseless granny. But we hear about Saddam, Iraq, and North Korea, but very little is every said about MUF, which is where the real potential nuclear threat lies.After rereading your post I now admit that I was wrong it my assumption that you were referring to President Bush vice Saddam Hussein. However, let me ask a complex question and get your response. You call Saddam a deranged leader. Now if he, Saddam, could obtain WMD in addition to his chemical weapons do you think that he would attempt to do so knowing his objectives in that area of the world? Now, we are almost 100% positive that he did not have nuclear weapons or the infrastructure to obtain them in the near future . However, if he did have the capability of acquiring them would it not have been to the worlds advantage to remove this possibility? Hindsight is almost 100% right, so we blame President Bush and the American Congress for attacking Iraq due to hindsight and the wrong reason.