Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Why? Why are observers not allowed to monitor the count?
Are the Democrats hiding something people don't want to see?
Are the Democrats hiding something people don't want to see?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Observers not allowed to monitor the vote count by the Democrats.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
And, consider the fact that your only source of this is the first-grader like tantrum of the man-child that is Trump.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Trump campaign announces federal lawsuit in Nevada, alleging 'illegal votes' being counted
Again, no observers are being allowed to monitor the election count by the Democrats.
Why?
Again, no observers are being allowed to monitor the election count by the Democrats.
Why?
The election officials are overseeing the count. Why what state are we talking about? PA?
What could be more secure than mail in ballots? The voters may have photocopied them and notarized them. It wouldn't be safe to mess with them.
This election is over. We count the votes as fast as possible, letting the courts decide when the cutoff is. Then we accept the answers. Anybody who can't let it go after that shall be promoted out of his or her position. Call it a new definition of 'Ex cathedra'.
What could be more secure than mail in ballots? The voters may have photocopied them and notarized them. It wouldn't be safe to mess with them.
This election is over. We count the votes as fast as possible, letting the courts decide when the cutoff is. Then we accept the answers. Anybody who can't let it go after that shall be promoted out of his or her position. Call it a new definition of 'Ex cathedra'.
Oh that is so surprising. If he's suing then it surely means a wrong has been committed, because he'd never sue just for political gain.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
So why are Democrats blocking observers?
Trump lies.
The truth?
One thing Trump repeatedly claimed in his speech tonight was that his campaign representatives were not being given access to observe the vote-counting process and that they’ve had to sue in order to “have people watch.” First of all, the vote-counting process is always bipartisan and campaign observers are allowed to witness it. Second of all, his lawsuits (in Pennsylvania and Michigan) weren’t about being allowed to observe — because, again, they are and have been allowed — they’re about how close those observers able to stand. The lawsuit in Michigan was thrown out, and the Pennsylvania one was dismissed today after both sides agreed to the number of observers each campaign can have in the room.
2020 Election: Live Results And Coverage
I would feel better about it if the workers were only wearing underclothes. They could be hiding something in their clothes.
They aren't as far as I can see, because you aren't saying what you are talking about. If something dirty is happening it'll come out. It can't be hidden. They are recording the count on video tape. The only problem is time. They just need to to count, because it takes time to deal with paper ballots. Stalling for time is a clear tactic of the Republican candidate, so please.
Do you think Democrats are the only people counting ballots?
Which is not true. ALL the election polling places in the country have Republican and Democrat observers present at the counting of ballots. When the Democrats were requested to add more Republican observers they were allowed with no objections.
All the ballots caste in the USA and entered in the computer as in the past are backed up by the original paper ballots. Recounts in past elections have never been different by more than 1,000 votes or so in recent history.
Where is the problem?
Last edited:
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
After telling his supporters to go vote in person, why should we expect different results as the mail-in votes are counted?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It appears Covid distancing is the excuse being used. At least your the first here to address the op question.
Daemon Sophic
Avatar in flux
Vote counting is bipartisan and there is a process for observing an election as well, that varies by state.
Policies for Election Observers
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Are the camera angles fixed? Or can you monitor the entire room to ensure nothing is occurring off screen?
Tambourine
Well-Known Member
Yes. Democrats are stealing the election.
That's why it's important for all Trump supporters to arm themselves and be ready to resist the inevitable communist takeover of the United States by known Marxists Biden & Harris.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Every single post before then put your pitiful conspiracy theory (of which you've offered no valid, credible sourses) to bed. Just come to terms with the fact that most Americans dislike dumpster fires and so extinguished yours. Sowwy.
Social distancing was never used as an excuse, ALL polling places in the election had both Democratic and Republican observers. When in some polling places there was a request for more Republican observers they were allowed without objection. The only request was that they wore masks and observed social distancing.
There are also both Democratic and Republican poll workers.