Skwim
Veteran Member
. . . it suits my purpose.
Of course there's nothing wrong with using such a definition, but it allows such activities as baseball, piano practicing, and gay-rights promotion to be regarded as religions.
So much for the integrity of Ken Ham---as if anyone ever thought he had any in the first place.
So as to the debate: Ken Ham has integrity V. No he doesn't.
Ken Ham:
The Nations T. Rex will be a centerpiece for the Smithsoniana museum funded by our tax dollars. In reality, then, the government is imposing the religion of evolution and millions of years on children visiting the Smithsonian, while also claiming a supposed separation of church and state! Our tax dollars are funding the religion of naturalism (atheism) and its evolutionary story to be exhibited in the Smithsonian in the nations capital!"
SOURCE
Anyone else feel the utter disingenuousness in this remark? Of course Ham has his reason for characterization of evolution as a religionThe Nations T. Rex will be a centerpiece for the Smithsoniana museum funded by our tax dollars. In reality, then, the government is imposing the religion of evolution and millions of years on children visiting the Smithsonian, while also claiming a supposed separation of church and state! Our tax dollars are funding the religion of naturalism (atheism) and its evolutionary story to be exhibited in the Smithsonian in the nations capital!"
SOURCE
"Religion is a cause, a principle, or an activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.6
source
(Note that Ham took his definition from the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 1996,)source
Of course there's nothing wrong with using such a definition, but it allows such activities as baseball, piano practicing, and gay-rights promotion to be regarded as religions.
So much for the integrity of Ken Ham---as if anyone ever thought he had any in the first place.
So as to the debate: Ken Ham has integrity V. No he doesn't.