So who is the most conservative candidate running for president?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Reverend Rick said:So who is the most conservative candidate running for president?
Reverend Rick said:So who is the most conservative candidate running for president?
comprehend said:Ron Paul?
Radio Frequency X said:After listening to Giuliani lecture Sean Hannity on respecting differing opinions and on his pressuring of Democrats and Republicans to take an actual stand on the Iraq war (like Obama has done and like Giuliani has done), I am throwing all my support behind Giuliani, until I know who the Libertarian Candidate is. Giuliani sounds unlike any politician I've ever heard going into an election. He actually has me excited!
All I can say is one word, PROPHECY.....comprehend said:WASHINGTON - Mitt Romney won the most support for the Republican presidential nomination in a straw poll of GOP activists attending an annual conference. (full article)
CPAC STRAW POLL RESULTS:
Mitt Romney 21%
Rudy Giuliani 17%.
Sam Brownback 15%
Newt Gingrich 14%
John McCain, 12%
Romney surprise?
FFH said:All I can say is one word, PROPHECY.....
I am surprised it's that high though.
Mercy Not Sacrifice said:OOOHH! Is there a link to this video?
We're all going to be surprised when Romney wins and suddenly wants to have multiple Vice Presidentscomprehend said:Romney surprise?
nutshell said:There's an article on msnbc right now talking about peaking too early. I think Giulianni and Obama might be facing that. For example, a year before primaries (where we are right now), some guy named bill Clinton was only getting 4% of the vote before winning the primary and general elections a year/year and a half later.
nutshell said:There's an article on msnbc right now talking about peaking too early. I think Giulianni and Obama might be facing that. For example, a year before primaries (where we are right now), some guy named bill Clinton was only getting 4% of the vote before winning the primary and general elections a year/year and a half later.
Hmmm, well Hillary obviously has the advantage financially, but that may be due to "connections" in high places...well, first quarter fundraising numbers are in:
Hillary 26 million
Obama - 25 million
Romney - 23.5 million
Guliani - 15 million
does this make any difference whatever to the race? will the fundraising numbers affect the poll numbers?
Read "Freakonomics". The causal relationship between money and winning elections doesn't show up in the actual data. It is more likely that the high amount of money is caused by perceptions of who has a better chance of winning.Hmmm, well Hillary obviously has the advantage financially, but that may be due to "connections" in high places...
Kennedy won office simply because he had the most money. which is mainly used to advertise in any campaign...It's all about getting the word out through advertising.... His father helped him financially, with the money he made in the market, just before it crashed in 1929. He pulled out at it's peak, just before it went down...
It looks like it's coming down to Hillary and Mitt...
Wow, it will be a good one...