Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, Kamala Harris cannot run for President. In fact she probably should not be Vice President. How could Democrats have forgotten that the Dred Scott decision means that she is not a "natural born citizen". Or at least that is what a Republican group is claiming:
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the Constitution amended some time after the decision?
Republican group cites Dred Scott ruling as reason Kamala Harris can’t be president
Group also challenged right of Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley to appear on Republican primary ballots
www.independent.co.uk
The National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA) has cited the infamous 1857 Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, which stated that enslaved people weren’t citizens, to argue that Vice President Kamala Harris is ineligible to run for president according to the Constitution.
“An originalist and strict constructionist understanding of the Constitution in the Scalia and Thomas tradition, as well as precedent-setting U.S. Supreme Court cases ... have found that a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ is defined as a person born on American soil of parents who are both citizens of the United States at the time of the child’s birth,” the document states.
The group then cites six cases including Dred Scott v Sandford. The 1857 ruling came a few years before the 1861 outbreak of the US Civil War over the issue of slavery, stating that enslaved people could not be citizens, meaning that they couldn’t expect to receive any protection from the courts or the federal government. The ruling also said that Congress did not have the power to ban slavery from a federal territory.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the Constitution amended some time after the decision?