Please show me
EXACTLY where I have blamed the Mormon Church for this shooting? Oh wait, I have not. I've simply made the assertion that there is a great deal of pressure on members of this faith, and I was curious (please re-read my posts for clarification, and look up the definition of the word curious) to see if this pressure played a part in his actions. Nothing more, nothing less. You really need to stop assuming, it makes you look foolish.
I never said churches were the only thing that make people snap, but in my experience as an ex-Mormon (spent 25+ years of my life involved in the church), the pressure within the church to 'perform' and 'act' as a Mormon is incredibly intense. Also, what is your bizarre fascination with bringing poly people into every discussion we have?
It may, or it may not have -- that is what I'm curious about, and which I've stated multiple times on this thread. Please read the thread before asking a question that has been asked over and over again.
You assume 'holy' means good and that this pressure is good. Imagine being forced to live a certain way. As a teenager, you really don't have a ton of control over your life choices, and with the added stress of a church who controls everything (which I've already stated), this pressure can cause people to crack. Most people go more of a depression/suicidal thoughts route, but I have seen people go the anger and violence route because of the pressure.
You obviously are ignoring the intense lifestyle that is put-upon Mormon children/teenagers. Just the Mormon lifestyle could be an entirely different thread, but you need to understand how intense it is.
Imagine being a teenager. Imagine now that someone says, you can only wear this underwear, this clothing, watch this show, listen to this music, eat this food, drink this drink and hang out with these people. Otherwise, you are 'sinning' and won't make it to heaven, but Outer Darkness (or spiritual prison). It's incredibly restrictive and suffocating for many...and some don't make it out in one piece, or even at all.
There is no proof one way or the other (unless someone has a reference link available), and that is what I'm trying to get at. I'm trying to find out if his faith did or did not play into his decision. You are trying to make this something it isn't.
It's like talking to a brick wall. I'm simply postulating that the pressures from his faith could have contributed to his decisioin to become violent.
Could have...not did. But could have...it's a hypothetical idea until proven. Do you understand? Or do I need to break it down for you even more on an elementary level so you can see what is happening here?