Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Care to give a shot at an explanation?stumbled into text that left a huge divide
and the same article leaned to the notion that a line drawn seems elusive
anyone want to give it a shot?
stumbled into text that left a huge divide
and the same article leaned to the notion that a line drawn seems elusive
anyone want to give it a shot?
ok guys.....wikipedia
but I was thinking the forum might have a go at it
wiki is all fine and good.....but states the line drawn is questioned
example....carbon dioxide....
inorganic
I would not have thought so
stumbled into text that left a huge divide
and the same article leaned to the notion that a line drawn seems elusive
anyone want to give it a shot?
so eventually.....association of a compoundOrganic is an archaic word that chemists themselves will say was made obsolete 100 years ago when someone synthesize an inorganic compound into an organic one.
For modern chemistry in general, organic does not refer to carbon based molecules, but hydrocarbon based molecules.
Ethanol: CH3-CH2-OH is organic. Carbon monoxide C=O is inorganic.
Edited to add: Organic used to be an important term referring to the stuff from which life comes. It was hypothesized by some that organic molecules had some kind of living essence infused into them. At the time, people did not know that all atoms are made from the same stuff, and didn't know (or didn't want to know) that there is nothing particularly unique about the materials from which life is made.
To a biologist, the distinction doesn't really matter, and it's not something we think about. No biologist is going to not study CO2 in life just because it's an inorganic compound.
ok guys.....wikipedia
but I was thinking the forum might have a go at it
wiki is all fine and good.....but states the line drawn is questioned
example....carbon dioxide....
inorganic
I would not have thought so
so eventually.....association of a compound
to the chemistry of life
will fade
maybe to say.?....it is organic DURING the use of the compound
and inorganic when not within the body of a a living thing
ok...
but I must be mistaken by a line drawn earlier in my life
the compound in question must PROMOTE life
carbon dioxide is of no use to us humans
but plants suck it up
I get overdose......drink enough of any of those three organic drinks, you will not be a living thing either.
I get overdose......
but carbon gets around
and when it hooks up it can promote life
or kill it
the human fat molecule is carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen
and breaks down into water and carbon dioxide
if carbon is key.....then is water organic?
kinda hard to not drink water
so you lean to the lab.....fineAgain, the term 'organic' is a technical one for chemistry.
Organic chemistry - Wikipedia
Not all organic compounds in chemistry are related to living things. In fact, a great number of them are made in labs and can be quite toxic.
so you lean to the lab.....fine
and some poisons are medicine
and chemistry does not exist?.......in organsNot that I lean to the lab. But you asked about the meaning of the term 'organic' in the context of chemistry. In that context, the word does NOT require a link to living things. It is the chemistry of most carbon compounds.
and chemistry does not exist?.......in organs