Kooky
Freedom from Sanity
Yes, this is about the Holy Roman Emperor of Europe!This thread is about Orwell.
Not Cipolla.
So please, stay on topic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, this is about the Holy Roman Emperor of Europe!This thread is about Orwell.
Not Cipolla.
So please, stay on topic.
Orwell was really prescient when it comes to the rise of right-wing authoritarianism in European society.I guess he was so right.
He is a prophet of the 20th century.
How the Western man will be slave of mindsets, and will be deprived of critical thinking.
How he will be blackmailed and / or bribed
And a communist, let's not forget that.
The thing about a free press, you see, is that you get all sorts of press reports, some reliable and others not reliable at all. But the intelligent person soon learns what sources can be trusted and, by reading around a bit, can get different takes on any given news story. That is not what you find depicted in Orwell's 1984.I mean " the West "
I know all that, but i meant that the west has a lot of kind of very biased irresponsible reportimg.The thing about a free press, you see, is that you get all sorts of press reports, some reliable and others not reliable at all. But the intelligent person soon learns what sources can be trusted and, by reading around a bit, can get different takes on any given news story. That is not what you find depicted in Orwell's 1984.
Whereas in China, on matters considered sensitive by the authorities, you can't find out anything you can rely on at all. (The treatment of the Uighurs is a good example.) And that is exactly what you find depicted in 1984.
True enough. But you can find out what's going on.I know all that, but i meant that the west has a lot of kind of very biased irresponsible reportimg.
Of course. Whenever we want to say something good about a socialist, we suddenly discover the very fine doctrinal distinctions between the many and varied schools of socialist thought that we typically omit in favor of subsuming every self identifying Marxist under the label Soviet style authoritarian communism.While he can't be neatly pigeon holed, at that point he was more of a democratic socialist (and anti-communist).
Of course. Whenever we want to say something good about a socialist, we suddenly discover the very fine doctrinal distinctions between the many and varied schools of socialist thought that we typically omit in favor of subsuming every self identifying Marxist under the label Soviet style authoritarian communism.
Mussolini stopped being a socialist around WW1 because too many socialists were anti-war.I have to underline that Mussolini himself was a socialist, not a rightist.
Mussolini stopped being a socialist around WW1 because too many socialists were anti-war.
He made his money after the war commandeering anti-socialist hit squads for landlords.
Feel free to support your claims with evidence.I remind you that only after the 20s the lands were expropriated from the landlords and divided among the Italian citizens.
This is history.
You cannot rewrite history.
Agricultural policy of Fascism (Italy) - WikipediaFeel free to support your claims with evidence.
By the way, would you care to explain what Mussolini has to do with the thread's topic?