I don't believe so. Your phrase seems to include a racial slur, which is inappropriate for this board.
1) It's said commonly enough here, with no racial intent. I was unaware it could be taken in such a fashion, although some quick google-fu shows that the expression is avoided in North America (sometimes/always/maybe) due to spade being a racial slur.
2) If anyone took it as such, I unreservedly apologise. It wasn't my intent at all.
3) The origins of the saying are older than the racial slur.
Call a spade a spade - Wikipedia
Regardless, all I meant was that your hat comment was unfamiliar to me, and I was assuming it meant something akin to 'speaking plainly'.
When there is no belief in God, or respect for God's laws, then a place can be said to be godless. The 'wasteland' part probably should've been a clue for you.
Conflation of wasteland and Godless is the entire point I am making, and you seem to disagree with.
Odd that you would conflate my pronouncement with a Christian God, when I referenced none. Are you just making an assumption that I meant an Abrahamic god, or are you just looking to pick a fight with Christians again?
Not odd. I conflated it with 'your God'. There are high levels of religiosity in both Iran and Mexico. It made little sense to me to see your comments as meaning 'any God'.
Large swaths of Mexico are barren and nasty, filled with the detritus of humanity that have few redeeming features. A comparison to a modern-day Sodom and Gomorrah is apt.
And yet they are not 'godless', even accepting your cartoonish depiction.
Iran is a theocracy, just practices brutal culture and laws that violate all sorts of international norms, not only limited to the compassion found within religion.
It's not 'compassion found within religion' driving apostasy laws in Iran, and neither is it 'godlessness'.
Odd that you leave out North Korea. So is that cool with you then, Mr. Judgmental?
Not at all. I wouldn't **** on the place if it was on fire, to speak bluntly. I don't blame the people, but the regime is truly horrible. The fact that they force non-religion on people is an abomination in my mind.
However, I wouldn't actually argue with you calling North Korea a 'godless wasteland'. It's kinda an apt description, if taken as a generalization.
I never said this. You seem to be very agitated with my God. Did He offend you in some horrible way?
How could he? That's kinda a weird comment. What I'm actually saying is that you equate 'godless' with 'bad'. But your version of 'godless' includes a whole range of people who would bristle at being called atheists. Meanwhile, an atheist living in a country with much higher levels of 'godlessness' finds it hard to equate the place as a wasteland.
I can assure you, I have no issues with your God, and he can do whatever he wants with my soul when I die. My issues are completely limited to
some of his followers.
I'm glad the druglords, warlords, communist butchers and genital-mutilating imams have you to protect them. I hadn't realized they were such delicate flowers. Thank you for standing up for their rights.
I've mentioned it before, but you're kinda passive aggressive. I'm not defending anyone. I just couldn't give a crap whether a druglord, warlord, communist butcher or genital mutilating imam is godless or not. Either way, I'd equate them to the dog poo I accidentally stepped in this morning.
What any of that has to do with you equating 'godless' with 'wasteland' in such cavalier fashion, I have no idea.