peacecrusader888
Active Member
Why is our moon constant? We only see one side of the moon. And this was what our ancestors saw.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why is our moon constant? We only see one side of the moon. And this was what our ancestors saw.
From your link:
I don´t think so. The cause of this is that the Moon once was ejected from the Earth early in the formation when the entire Solar System was molten hot.Relative to the Earth, the Moon makes one rotation every 29.5 days. That happens to also be the time it takes for the Moon to complete one revolution around the Earth. This might seem like a coincidence, but it's not.
In the past, the Moon used to rotate much faster than it does now. But over millions of years, the effect of the Earth's gravity has slowed down the Moon's rotation until it became gravitationally locked to the Earth. This is why we always see the same side of the Moon.
It's tidally-locked with Earth due to Earth's gravity, which is a pretty common occurence throughout the Solar System. The moons of Mars (Phobos and Deimos), the four major moons of Jupiter (Europa, Io, Callisto and Ganymede), Saturn's moon Titan, Neptune's moon Triton and Pluto's moon Charon are also tidally-locked.Why is our moon constant? We only see one side of the moon. And this was what our ancestors saw.
Which all clearly indicates a direct formative connection to their mother planets. A connection which has nothing to do with gravity but everything to do with a formation ejected from the mother planets in the early days of the formation.It's tidally-locked with Earth due to Earth's gravity, which is a pretty common occurence throughout the Solar System. The moons of Mars (Phobos and Deimos), the four major moons of Jupiter (Europa, Io, Callisto and Ganymede), Saturn's moon Titan, Neptune's moon Triton and Pluto's moon Charon are also tidally-locked.
Yet astronauts on 9 missions have seen the far side, and we have sent uncrewed probes to map the entire surface in detail..."the maximum amount of lunar surface that we can see over time is 59%." That means 41% is never seen by someone on earth.
Very interesting calculations.-it is receding...it is getting farther away and taking longer to orbit earth, about 1.5 inches further away each year, so that 5,500 years ago when humans first began writing down records of observations of the moon, it was on average almost 700 feet closer than it is today (65 million years ago, when the dinosaurs met their demise, the Moon would have been about 18,500 miles closer, it's orbital period shorter, the tides higher...)
I don't think that would work, because it would assume that the recession rate is/was constant.Very interesting calculations.
If taking the about 1.5 inches annually receding and counting further backwards, one then can calculate when the formation of the Moon took place. yes? Would you like to make such a calculation?
Maybe I´m a little out of context, but the Earth also recedes annually from the Sun with some 15.6 cm. Are there similar measurements of the other planets receding from the Sun?
No worries. The sun's energy output will increase, and it will expand into a red giant and most likely engulf Earth before it's gone very far.I dunno but I'm getting off this rock before it freezes.
No worries. The sun's energy output will increase, and it will expand into a red giant and most likely engulf Earth before it's gone very far.
Why is our moon constant? We only see one side of the moon. And this was what our ancestors saw.
There is no backside.
It's tidally-locked with Earth due to Earth's gravity
You're welcome to do the math yourself. Although I did it as a linear calculation, it's really not linear; the tidal slowing was much greater early on, and will be much slower billions of years from now. So my 65 million year calculation is probably off a bit (but since it's only about 1.4 percent of the time since the formation of the moon, it shouldn't be off by too much). I'm sure it's not difficult to find the correct formulae for doing the more accurate calculations.Very interesting calculations.
If taking the about 1.5 inches annually receding and counting further backwards, one then can calculate when the formation of the Moon took place. yes? Would you like to make such a calculation?
I'm sure there are.Maybe I´m a little out of context, but the Earth also recedes annually from the Sun with some 15.6 cm. Are there similar measurements of the other planets receding from the Sun?