Cooky
Veteran Member
It isn't just Islam but relgious fundamentalism in general.
Especially if it includes putting free thinkers *to death*, thus eliminating those free-thinking qualities from the gene pool.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It isn't just Islam but relgious fundamentalism in general.
Kind of like Christianity of current.
Yes,
Turn murtad, muslims would gladly put people permanently in the ditch. Peanut butter jelly style.And for those who are muslims; they have no choice since leaving Islam is punished by death.
Mistake according to you? Or to the teaching of Islam?No need to repeat, if you write it correct from the start.
I never asked you to repeat, on the contrary, I asked you to stop repeating to write the same mistake
Some would like to, especially the Christian loons we have in America, but are kept from doing that by the law (which they're constantly trying to change).Yes, because Christians in France and America kill free-thinkers who openly renounce their faith.
Yes it did, only it has not been called the dark ages for some time, the term is something of a misrepresentation of the reality of the mediaeval period.
Sharia are as fanatical as fanatics everywhere.
Yes, because Christians in France and America kill free-thinkers who openly renounce their faith.
With the onset of puberty, the individual becomes subject to shar‘i rulings that apply to him, so he should not shake hands with women or look at them, and he should not be alone with a woman, because he has now become accountable and the things that are prohibited for adult men are also prohibited for him, because he is one of them. It is not permissible to be careless about this matter, and it is essential to take it seriously. So you must refuse to go to the women’s prayer hall, and refuse to shake hands with non-mahram women or look at them, including your cousins, even if they object to you doing that, because there can be no obedience to any created being if it involves disobedience towards the Creator.
Can you explain " There were no books during that time and no education. Seems pretty dark in that respect."There were no books during that time and no education. Seems pretty dark in that respect.
...The Muslims took all the books, and after a few generations, the people were stupid again.
Haha, I like that. I think I'll steal that one.funnymentalists
Not slave. Devoted to AllahAs Hitchens used to say, it appears that anyone who commits to this religion has the desire to be a slave. Very sad, IMO.
Thank you, I already suspected this to be the case. But I just wanted to hear you say it out loud. Thank you for the confirmation.Mistake according to you? Or to the teaching of Islam?
Sharia law is an unwritten law, and some people do practice it to strict yes.
How many christians? 2.4 billion
How many christians in America, approximately 205 million, a percentage of whom are funnymentalist, armed and ready to kill. Check out the FBI statistics on who is most likely to kill you in America, christian or muslim.
And about 35 million christians in france.
Small numbers compared to the overall but still they both have funnymentalists and terrorists among their christian ranks
There are christian funnymentalists in just about every country and christian terrorists in some, including france and america
Don't forget Africa, christians are still burning witches there
I have already said, it is wrong to kill other human beings, that is even the teaching of Islam.Thank you, I already suspected this to be the case. But I just wanted to hear you say it out loud. Thank you for the confirmation.
So, just to be abundantly clear
You are not willing to say "It is a wrong practice in Islam to kill people who blaspheme"
Hence you stick to your words "they just practice Islam more strict than others"
And we all know that there is nothing wrong with being strict in a teaching
Being strict is seen as a virtue, it means one is consistent
And strict means that we can count on them
What they will do in a given situation
You are willing to say "I would not kill people who blaspheme"
That is a relieve, but of course that can change anytime
As you are not a strict believer of Islam, yet
There were no books during that time and no education. Seems pretty dark in that respect.
...The Muslims took all the books, and after a few generations, the people were stupid again.
Can you explain " There were no books during that time and no education. Seems pretty dark in that respect."
Question: if there were no books at that time and you say The Muslims took all the books"
how could muslims take all the books when there was non? That sound impossible to me
I agree that there was war between muslims and Christians at those times, but that is not the religions teachings fault, that was a human fault because of politics. In my opinionIt actually happened when the Muslims began seizing whole cities after the fall of Rome. The Muslims attacked cities and towns and ceized their libraries, which held all the books.
It wasn't until much later, that Christians began to take back their old cities, and got back those books that the Dark Ages ended.
I agree that there was war between muslims and Christians at those times, but that is not the religions teachings fault, that was a human fault because of politics. In my opinion
As a woman who has been raped i kind of like that idea. Castrated from the neck sounds good