Should humanity overcome death?
Death has dominated the human psyche, religion, philosophy, and culture since before the dawn of recorded history.
But should Humanity overcome death?
Or is it best to accept things as they are, and learn to live with the fact that death comes for all?
Sit at your puter and watch the
>population clock< for a minute.
Then tell me the world needs more people.
Each animal ─ not least us humans ─ is born with the evolved seasons of a life built in ─ infancy and learning to belong to your family and your community and to speak their language, education in what your community holds are necessary skills, adolescence and preparation for pairing off, parenthood and the repeat of the cycle, and grandparenthood, whose benefits to children have been studied and found to be important and positive.
But great-grandparenthood? Nope, not contributive. Sure, it's natural to be afraid of death, it's natural be be as healthy as you can, but it's also natural that your life has an upper boundary, and as the population ages, proportionately fewer and fewer taxpayers are there to support the aging population and their naturally increasing health demands.
Do we want Trump and Putin to live forever? It will be the robber barons, the billionaires, the people who won't let go of power, who'll be first in line for the finished product of immortality.
So instead, consider a famous passage in Homer (
Iliad Bk 6: 146-8):
οἵη περ φύλλων γενεὴ τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδρών.
φύλλα τὰ μέν τ' ἄνεμος χαμάδις χέει, ἄλλα δ θ' ὕλη
τηλεθόωσα φύει, ἔαρος δ' ἐπιγίγνεται ὥρη:
As the generations of leaves, so those of men.
The wind scatters the leaves to the ground but the wood
bursts into new bud and the spring comes round.
Unless, of course, we were packing them into starships for the very long periods it takes to travel round our galaxy. But I suspect such projects, if ─ big if ─ we ever get serious about them, will be better dealt with by android versions of us, Homo sapiens mechanicus.