Pagan God's and Goddesses hate radical -monotheism

[Spiderman]

But why does that have to be "his maker", with references to completely foreign Lore?

Not a single one of the Gods is omnipotent.

And there is one entity I can immediately think of who would have that kind of power over him. But this one is not his "maker".



Indeed.

Do you know the story of Krishna and his wives?

No, that's funny though cuz I was just recalling a Beatles song about Krishna. Tell me

 

[sayak83]

Of course, the God's and Goddesses hate any religious extremists of any faith that persecute their followers, so saying "radical Islam " would be Politically Incorrect and unfair since at one time there were Christian governments like Saudi Arabia as well.

Radical-monotheism is not just the greatest enemy of Jews, Christians, homosexuals, women, and Atheists, but also the greatest enemy of Osiris, Zeus, Shiva, Elephant (Hindu) God, Buddha, Fairies and Leprechauns (yes, many people worship them, have seen them, and interact with Fairies and Leprechauns).

Humans can be replaced but those Buddhist Temples cannot. So, if you are pagan, Buddhist, or a witch, no one is your enemy more than radical-monotheism (Today).

Some Christians will say you follow the Devil (I think those Christians are out of line btw ), but in any of the predominately Christian countries today, people will let you live your life ,

, and there are not laws calling for your death or imprisonment if you are caught worshiping many God's, practicing witchcraft, being atheist, being gay etc. That isn't the case with many other non Christian nations.

So, if you believe in Osiris or Odin, I don't see how they could not be at odds with extreme monotheism . If you believe in Fairies or are a necromancer, or into voodoo , you can be sure that all of those spirits are angry at the persecutor of their followers, so invoke many curses to destroy it.

If you are pagan, perhaps one can sick their God's and Godesses on them. Curses, prayers, fasting, hexes, and spells have power!

If you are spiritual in any other way, know that this evil force needs to be destroyed more than any other, for it oppresses more people like yourself than any other philosophy or institution.

Radical-monotheism is not just Isis, Taliban, El shabab, Boko Harem, Al-Qaeda , or some other terrorist group.

The Saudi Government (America's Alli ) is also an extremist Nation , along with any other Nation where adulterers are stoned to death, people are publicly decapitated, homosexuals are murdered and thrown from the tops of mosques, or imprisoned or executed for practicing or preaching a different Faith or blasphemy.

Any nation that arrests or sexually assaults women for dressing a certain way, doesn't let them leave the house without a man's permission, doesn't let them get educated, doesn't let them Drive, or stones them to death, is an extremist nation and Religion.

Those types of Crusades and inquisitions are currently affecting hundreds of millions of people in our world, depriving many of free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of sexuality, freedom to question and learn, women's equality.

I'm not just singling muslims out, for if a Catholic government were to rise up and Outlaw Free Speech, women's equality, freedom of religion, freedom to be Atheist, and freedom to blaspheme , that Government should be recognized as a Nazi Dictatorship, sanctioned by the free -world , and overthrown.

Also, monotheistic-extremists are not only the greatest enemy of women, homosexuals, pagans, witches, sorcerers, shamans, necromancers, atheists, Christians, and Jews, but also are responsible for the deaths of Muslims (more than any other religion, regime, or hate -group )

They persecute, terrorize, and slaughter the moderate muslims. I have nothing against a Muslim who is for women's rights, against stoning or decapitating people, against amputating limbs or female genital mutilation, against terrorism, against Jihad, against forced dress code, against killing homosexuals , against intolerance toward other faiths, or forcing Religion on people.

Christians who do those things are even more disgusting, because those behaviors are the exact opposite of what Christ repeatedly told people to do and not to do.

But at this time I don't see radical Christians getting control of governments and persecuting everyone that isn't Christian.

However, the problem is not just Islam but radical Monotheism. I see nothing more nauseating in our modern, enlightened world. Yes I have met extremist Christians and it puts toxic chemicles in my bloodstream + makes me want to vomit

Last I looked the world is at war with such extremist monotheists, so while mostly supporting your idea, what precisely more do you want Europe, USA, NATO, India etc. to do ?

 

[Spiderman]

Last I looked the world is at war with such extremist monotheists, so while mostly supporting your idea, what precisely more do you want Europe, USA, NATO, India etc. to do ?

Recognize who the enemy is...sanction nations like Saudi -Arabia and acknowledge their Nazi Government as pure evil.

Possibly arm the moderate Muslims who want to do away with all this barbaric dark-age inquisition garbage, to overthrow these misogynist totalitarian Governments, and recognize them as enemies of the free -world.

We should not say "it's their culture and Religion, we can't tell them how to live ".

Oh really, so if a nation had a culture that lynched blacks and treated them like Saudis treat their women, we should just say, "its their culture, we shouldn't tell them how to live. "

If culture is pure evil , bigoted, and robbing people of basic rights , it should be seen as despicable and doesn't even deserve to be called "culture "

 

[sayak83]

Recognize who the enemy is...sanction nations like Saudi -Arabia and acknowledge their Nazi Government as pure evil.

Ridiculous. There is no evidence whatsoever that the policies of Saudi Arabia are any more extremist than the popular views of the citizens themselves. Evidence from Egypt, Palestine, Pakistan etc. show that whenever there are free elections, its the very conservative Muslim parties that win by gigantic margins. The fact is extremist or very conservative islam is the majority position among the people in the Middle East. They want shariah to be the law of their land. So unless you are proposing genocide, the only reasonable policy is to fight only those nations and groups that are actually sponsoring terror attacks in the world.

Possibly arm the moderate Muslims who want to do away with all this barbaric dark-age inquisition garbage, to overthrow these misogynist totalitarian Governments, and recognize them as enemies of the free -world.

Their numbers are vanishingly small in the Middle East.

We should not say "it's their culture and Religion, we can't tell them how to live ".

You could try to conquer and recolonize the Middle East. is that the plan?

Oh really, so if a nation had a culture that lynched blacks and treated them like Saudis treat their women, we should just say, "its their culture, we shouldn't tell them how to live. "

US did that till the early 20th century. Nobody seemed to mind. If you are prosperous enough, nobody cares.

If culture is pure evil , bigoted, and robbing people of basic rights , it should be seen as despicable and doesn't even deserve to be called "culture

They WANT shariah. They vote for shariah .They (the Middle Eastern countries) want, by overwhelming majority, to follow the Salafi or the Wahabi interpretation of Islam. How can you give something to a group of people that reject them? The moderates are a minority and are fleeing from majority oppression in all these countries into US or Europe. Happening for decades now. This is why majority of Muslims in the West are moderate and the majority in the Middle East extremist or conservative literalist Muslims.

 

[Erebus]

I think I get what the OP is going for. Extremism in general is one of the more tragic aspects of our species. Extremist monotheism is particularly tragic, since it inspires a sort of destructive righteousness that harms both people and historic monuments.

I get that. I agree that it's a shame.

However, i also think it's just a part of what our species is. We're tribal and often violent. If it wasn't monotheism inspiring acts of destruction, it would be something else instead.

When it comes to how the gods view these things ... I really can't say. I definitely don't think that we can send them to attack extremists as though they were some kind of attack dog.

If I had to guess, I would imagine the gods are content to let nature take its course. Many of them will be around long after our species is extinct. Nature will persist regardless of whether we're around to blow small chunks of it up or not.

 

[Riverwolf]

No, that's funny though cuz I was just recalling a Beatles song about Krishna. Tell me

Krishna is just one deity, and a king of a grand city-state called Dwarka on top of that. But he had a thousand wives. What's a playful ever-youthful avatar of Vishnu gonna do?

He splits himself into a thousand different Krishnas.

Now, the way I see it, each one of those women is different. Each has a different personality, different likes and dislikes, etc., and so it would only make sense that each one of these Krishnas is going to be different as well.

Well, it's the same for the other Gods.

 

[Rick O'Shez]

By radical monotheism I mean extremists who believed in one God and believe in outlawing the worship of multiple gods or oppressing those who worship multiple gods and destroying their gods and temples.

In the UK the Christians stole all the Pagan festivals and sites. Damn cheek!

 

[Spiderman]

Ridiculous. There is no evidence whatsoever that the policies of Saudi Arabia are any more extremist than the popular views of the citizens themselves. Evidence from Egypt, Palestine, Pakistan etc. show that whenever there are free elections, its the very conservative Muslim parties that win by gigantic margins. The fact is extremist or very conservative islam is the majority position among the people in the Middle East. They want shariah to be the law of their land. So unless you are proposing genocide, the only reasonable policy is to fight only those nations and groups that are actually sponsoring terror attacks in the world.

Their numbers are vanishingly small in the Middle East.



You could try to conquer and recolonize the Middle East. is that the plan?



US did that till the early 20th century. Nobody seemed to mind. If you are prosperous enough, nobody cares.



They WANT shariah. They vote for shariah .They (the Middle Eastern countries) want, by overwhelming majority, to follow the Salafi or the Wahabi interpretation of Islam. How can you give something to a group of people that reject them? The moderates are a minority and are fleeing from majority oppression in all these countries into US or Europe. Happening for decades now. This is why majority of Muslims in the West are moderate and the majority in the Middle East extremist or conservative literalist Muslims.

Terrible! The reason the laws treat women worse than I would treat a dog is because women can't vote.

If any nation's polls are rigged it's those fascists.

So, if a nation votes that Jews should be put in forced labor camps, and the majority of citizens are in agreement, I guess we say, "well, the majority voted on it?"

People have been so brainwashed and kept in the dark in those countries they vote that way because they have been abused, mislead, lied to, indoctrinated, blinded, filled with fear, and poisoned from a very young age.

Those nations who vote like that are mentally ill and they ruin the life of every woman there as well as those who want freedom to disagree on faith and morals.

 

[Spiderman]

Krishna is just one deity, and a king of a grand city-state called Dwarka on top of that. But he had a thousand wives. What's a playful ever-youthful avatar of Vishnu gonna do?

He splits himself into a thousand different Krishnas.

Now, the way I see it, each one of those women is different. Each has a different personality, different likes and dislikes, etc., and so it would only make sense that each one of these Krishnas is going to be different as well.

Well, it's the same for the other Gods.

Hey that's cool. There are some people who think Odin is the one true God, therefore they are monotheists who worship Odin lol.

It's funny cuz I had a schizophrenic housemate say that Thor was Jesus Christ, Son of Odin

Some theories are that God has to create villains to cause all this drama, test us, entertain and glorify him, so that even Satan is a part of God's spirit, his dark mischievous side.

So, the theory of some is that the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob came to the Jews, he came to the Vikings/and others in the form of Odin, came to others as the Incarnate Jesus to shed his blood to appease himself,

.... that Jesus is also Horus...

I watched a debate yesterday where people gave their arguments about how Odin was the true God.

And then Mary appears to many people, but is actually a mother Godess in different form.

Could be. As I said, to commune and have friendship with them doesn't mean I have to know what is the correct folklore regarding them.

 

[Riverwolf]

Hey that's cool. There are some people who think Odin is the one true God, therefore they are monotheists who worship Odin lol.

It's funny cuz I had a schizophrenic housemate say that Thor was Jesus Christ, Son of Odin

That's funny. In the Old Days, Thor was regarded as the primary enemy of Christ.

Incidentally, Balder is the Odinson who is most Christlike, not Thor.

Some theories are that God has to create villains to cause all this drama, test us, entertain and glorify him, so that even Satan is a part of God's spirit, his dark mischievous side.

So, the theory of some is that the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob came to the Jews, he came to the Vikings/and others in the form of Odin,

Well whoever put forth that theory doesn't know their history.

Vikings didn't exist until the 9th century, and lasted until roughly the 11th century. Woden was being worshiped LONG before that.

came to others as the Incarnate Jesus to shed his blood to appease himself,

.... that Jesus is also Horus...

I watched a debate yesterday where people gave their arguments about how Odin was the true God.

And then Mary appears to many people, but is actually a mother Godess in different form.

Could be. As I said, to commune and have friendship with them doesn't mean I have to know what is the correct folklore regarding them.

There's no such thing as "correct folklore", except in the question of whether a certain group's folklore is being properly represented.

"One true God" simply does not make any sense in the proper context of historical pre-Christian traditions in the North. Even if such a thing could exist, it would most certainly not be Woden. It'd be Tiw if anyone.

 

[Spiderman]

That's funny. In the Old Days, Thor was regarded as the primary enemy of Christ.

Incidentally, Balder is the Odinson who is most Christlike, not Thor.



Well whoever put forth that theory doesn't know their history.

Vikings didn't exist until the 9th century, and lasted until roughly the 11th century. Woden was being worshiped LONG before that.



There's no such thing as "correct folklore", except in the question of whether a certain group's folklore is being properly represented.

"One true God" simply does not make any sense in the proper context of historical pre-Christian traditions in the North. Even if such a thing could exist, it would most certainly not be Woden. It'd be Tiw if anyone.

Just going by what I saw in a debate.

BTW, Woden and Odin are the same person. WIKI says so!

 

[sayak83]

Terrible! The reason the laws treat women worse than I would treat a dog is because women can't vote.

Women can and did vote in Egypt, Palestine, Pakistan and Turkey, all bringing in Islamist parties to power. Case in point Turkey, the most secular of Muslim majority and democratic states.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_and_Development_Party_(Turkey)
Other examples of Islamic democracies, where Sharia is favored, and women vote as abundantly as men,

Malaysia
Schedule 9 of Malaysian constitution recognizes Islamic law as a state subject; in other words, the states of Malaysia have the power to enact and enforce sharia.[101] Islamic criminal law statutes have been passed at the state level in Terengganu,[102] Kelantan[103] and Perlis,[104][page needed] but as of 2014 none of these laws have been implemented, as they contravene the Federal Constitution.[105][106][107] In 2007, Malaysia's Federal court ruled that apostasy matter lay "within the exclusive jurisdiction of Sharia Courts".[101] Malaysian Muslims can be sentenced to caning for such offences as drinking beer,[108] and adultery.[109] Several sharia crimes, such as khalwat (close proximity of unmarried man and woman) are punishable only in Sharia courts of Malaysia. Publishing an Islamic book that is different from official Malaysian version, without permission, is a crime in some states. Other sharia-based criminal laws were enacted with "Syariah Criminal Offences (Federal Territory) Act of 1997".[101] Muslims are bound by Sharia on personal matters, while members of other faiths follow civil law. Muslims are required to follow Islamic law in family, property and religious matters.[110] In 1988 the constitution was amended to state that civil courts cannot hear matters that fall within the jurisdiction of Sharia courts.[111]

Indonesia
Aceh is the only part of Indonesia to apply Sharia in full. Islamic courts in Aceh had long handled cases of marriage, divorce and inheritance. After special autonomy legislation was passed in 2001, the reach of courts extend to criminal justice.[167] Under a 2009 law, married people convicted of adultery can be sentenced to death by stoning, while unmarried people can be sentenced to 100 lashes. Offences such as being alone with an unrelated member of the opposite gender, gambling and breaking Islamic dress rules can be punished with a public caning.[168] In 2014, the provincial government of Aceh extended sharia's reach, enacting and enforcing sharia to apply it to non-Muslims as well.[169][170]
n other parts of Indonesia, religious courts have jurisdiction over civil cases between Muslim spouses on matters concerning marriage, divorce, reconciliation, and alimony. The competence of religious courts is not exclusive, and parties can apply to District Courts for adjudication on basis of Roman Dutch law or local adat.[171][dated info] Suharto’s New Order expanded the reach of Islamic law, first with the 1974 Marriage Act, which assigned jurisdiction over the marriage and divorce of Muslims to the Islamic courts (Indonesian: peradilan agama), and with the 1989 Religious Judicature Act, which elevated Islamic courts by making them a parallel legal system, equal to state courts and gave them jurisdiction over inheritance (wasiyyah), gifts (hibah) and religious endowments.[172] Muslim litigants could originally choose whether to have inheritance questions decided by the Islamic courts or by the civil courts but a 2006 amendment eliminated this possibility; the same amendment gave Islamic courts new jurisdiction over property disputes, including financial and economic matters.[172] Muslims seeking a divorce must also file their claim in Islamic courts.[172] The Compilation of Islamic Law 1991 (Indonesian: Kompilasi Hukum Islam) regulates marriage, inheritance, and charitable trusts (wakaf).[172] Islamic law falls outside the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court.[172] Since 2006, a number of districts have issued local ordinances based on sharia.[173]

Pakistan
Until 1978 Islamic law was largely restricted to personal status issues. Zia ul Haq introduced Sharia courts and made far reaching changes in the criminal justice system.[119] Articles 203a to 203j of the constitution establish a sharia court with the power to judge any law or government actions to be against Islam, and to review court cases for adherence to Islamic law. The penal code includes elements of sharia.[120] Under article 5, section 2 of the Ordinance No. VII of 1979, whoever is guilty of zina, "if he or she is a muhsan, be stoned to death at a public place; or if he or she is not a muhsan, be punished, at a public place, with whipping numbering one hundred stripes".[121] Under a 2006 law, rape cases can be heard under civil as well as Islamic law.[122]

 

[sayak83]

Terrible! The reason the laws treat women worse than I would treat a dog is because women can't vote.

If any nation's polls are rigged it's those fascists.

So, if a nation votes that Jews should be put in forced labor camps, and the majority of citizens are in agreement, I guess we say, "well, the majority voted on it?"

People have been so brainwashed and kept in the dark in those countries they vote that way because they have been abused, mislead, lied to, indoctrinated, blinded, filled with fear, and poisoned from a very young age.

Those nations who vote like that are mentally ill and they ruin the life of every woman there as well as those who want freedom to disagree on faith and morals.

If any nation's polls are rigged it's those fascists.

I actually follow these regions closely and no the polls were not rigged. The poll results broadly follow the immense popularity Shariah enjoys as a legal code as seen in poll after poll (both among men and women).
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/

Attitudes toward Islamic law vary significantly by region. Support for making sharia the law of the land is highest in South Asia (median of 84%). Medians of at least six-in-ten Muslims in sub-Saharan Africa (64%), the Middle East-North Africa region (74%) and Southeast Asia (77%) also favor enshrining sharia as official law. But in two regions, far fewer Muslims say Islamic law should be endorsed by their governments: Southern and Eastern Europe (18%) and Central Asia (12%).,

And in most countries the support is equally broad among men and women, and not by much at that.

In only two countries are men significantly more likely than women to favor enshrining sharia as official law: Pakistan (+16 percentage points) and Russia (+9). In most countries, Muslims with a secondary degree or higher (i.e., graduates of a high school, technical institute or college) are about as likely as those with less education to support Islamic law.

And not just for property law

In some regions, fewer back the imposition of severe punishments in criminal cases, such as cutting off the hands of thieves – an area of sharia known in Arabic as hudud (see Glossary). But in South Asia and the Middle East and North Africa, medians of more than half back both severe criminal punishments and the death penalty for Muslims who renounce their faith.

Note specifically how extremist and conservative Egypt and most of MidEast and South Asia is.

These include Egypt, where 74% of Muslims say sharia should be the law of the land and nearly three-quarters of them (or 55% of all Egyptian Muslims) say Islamic law should apply to people of all faiths.

In South Asia, support for applying religious law to family and property disputes is coupled with strong backing for severe criminal punishments, such as cutting off the hands of thieves (median of 81%) and the death penalty for Muslims who renounce their faith (76%). In the Middle East-North Africa region, medians of more than half favor strict criminal penalties (57%) and the execution of those who convert from Islam to another faith (56%).

If you look at the polls, most Muslims don't want any violence and live peacefully with the West. But they (including women) do want to remain in a very very very conservative society by choice. This is reality. You should accept it.

So, if a nation votes that Jews should be put in forced labor camps, and the majority of citizens are in agreement, I guess we say, "well, the majority voted on it?"

Is Saudi Arabia conducting genocide?

People have been so brainwashed and kept in the dark in those countries they vote that way because they have been abused, mislead, lied to, indoctrinated, blinded, filled with fear, and poisoned from a very young age.

So they say about the West as well. You have no evidence for this at all. They don't live in North Korea. I have nothing good to say about Islam. But it is a fact that Middle East has actually rejected, largely, the secular socialist way of the state by choice after 1970. (Turkey is the last holdout).

Those nations who vote like that are mentally ill and they ruin the life of every woman there as well as those who want freedom to disagree on faith and morals.

So your plan is what? Islam will become the majority religion of the world soon, and conservative Islam will have the decisive majority, as it does have now. The only reasonable solutions are to sanction those brands of extremist islam that actually promote terrorism, ally with the rest and force a compromise where moderate and liberals are free to emigrate out rather than be punished by the theocratic laws.

 

[Riverwolf]

Just going by what I saw in a debate.

BTW, Woden and Odin are the same person. WIKI says so!

"Wiki" says so? In that case, are they also both Wodenaz?

In the meantime, are Zeus and Jupiter the same as Tiw? Are they all, in fact, the same as Dyeus Phter?

Are Freyja and Frigga the same Goddess?

 

[Spiderman]

"Wiki" says so? In that case, are they also both Wodenaz?

In the meantime, are Zeus and Jupiter the same as Tiw? Are they all, in fact, the same as Dyeus Phter?

Are Freyja and Frigga the same Goddess?

If wiki says so yes

 

[Spiderman]

I actually follow these regions closely and no the polls were not rigged. The poll results broadly follow the immense popularity Shariah enjoys as a legal code as seen in poll after poll (both among men and women).
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/


And in most countries the support is equally broad among men and women, and not by much at that.


And not just for property law


Note specifically how extremist and conservative Egypt and most of MidEast and South Asia is.




If you look at the polls, most Muslims don't want any violence and live peacefully with the West. But they (including women) do want to remain in a very very very conservative society by choice. This is reality. You should accept it.


Is Saudi Arabia conducting genocide?


So they say about the West as well. You have no evidence for this at all. They don't live in North Korea. I have nothing good to say about Islam. But it is a fact that Middle East has actually rejected, largely, the secular socialist way of the state by choice after 1970. (Turkey is the last holdout).


So your plan is what? Islam will become the majority religion of the world soon, and conservative Islam will have the decisive majority, as it does have now. The only reasonable solutions are to sanction those brands of extremist islam that actually promote terrorism, ally with the rest and force a compromise where moderate and liberals are free to emigrate out rather than be punished by the theocratic laws.

so, I guess women in Saudi Arabia, if they could vote, would vote to be treated like that?

Talk about sick masochists that like to be controlled!

I've met some Abused women who were told they were no good, used and humiliated, and turned out like that.

Ever heard I'm Stockholm Syndrome?

Also it sounds to me like people that have been in prison so long, they prefer prison where they're treated like they are useless, rather than to have responsibilities.

 

[sayak83]

so, I guess women in Saudi Arabia, if they could vote, would vote to be treated like that?

Talk about sick masochists that like to be controlled!

I've met some Abused women who were told they were no good, used and humiliated, and turned out like that.

Ever heard I'm Stockholm Syndrome?

Also it sounds to me like people that have been in prison so long, they prefer prison where they're treated like they are useless, rather than to have responsibilities.

I wish it were otherwise. I hope it will change eventually. I was simply pointing out that people from more modernized nations have to act in a way that is consonant with reality on the ground, however unpalatable, than based on what we want reality to be.

 

[paarsurrey]

Of course, the God's and Goddesses hate any religious extremists of any faith that persecute their followers, so saying "radical Islam " would be Politically Incorrect and unfair since at one time there were Christian governments like Saudi Arabia as well.

Radical-monotheism is not just the greatest enemy of Jews, Christians, homosexuals, women, and Atheists, but also the greatest enemy of Osiris, Zeus, Shiva, Elephant (Hindu) God, Buddha, Fairies and Leprechauns (yes, many people worship them, have seen them, and interact with Fairies and Leprechauns).

Humans can be replaced but those Buddhist Temples cannot. So, if you are pagan, Buddhist, or a witch, no one is your enemy more than radical-monotheism (Today).

Some Christians will say you follow the Devil (I think those Christians are out of line btw ), but in any of the predominately Christian countries today, people will let you live your life ,

, and there are not laws calling for your death or imprisonment if you are caught worshiping many God's, practicing witchcraft, being atheist, being gay etc. That isn't the case with many other non Christian nations.

So, if you believe in Osiris or Odin, I don't see how they could not be at odds with extreme monotheism . If you believe in Fairies or are a necromancer, or into voodoo , you can be sure that all of those spirits are angry at the persecutor of their followers, so invoke many curses to destroy it.

If you are pagan, perhaps one can sick their God's and Godesses on them. Curses, prayers, fasting, hexes, and spells have power!

If you are spiritual in any other way, know that this evil force needs to be destroyed more than any other, for it oppresses more people like yourself than any other philosophy or institution.

Radical-monotheism is not just Isis, Taliban, El shabab, Boko Harem, Al-Qaeda , or some other terrorist group.

The Saudi Government (America's Alli ) is also an extremist Nation , along with any other Nation where adulterers are stoned to death, people are publicly decapitated, homosexuals are murdered and thrown from the tops of mosques, or imprisoned or executed for practicing or preaching a different Faith or blasphemy.

Any nation that arrests or sexually assaults women for dressing a certain way, doesn't let them leave the house without a man's permission, doesn't let them get educated, doesn't let them Drive, or stones them to death, is an extremist nation and Religion.

Those types of Crusades and inquisitions are currently affecting hundreds of millions of people in our world, depriving many of free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of sexuality, freedom to question and learn, women's equality.

I'm not just singling muslims out, for if a Catholic government were to rise up and Outlaw Free Speech, women's equality, freedom of religion, freedom to be Atheist, and freedom to blaspheme , that Government should be recognized as a Nazi Dictatorship, sanctioned by the free -world , and overthrown.

Also, monotheistic-extremists are not only the greatest enemy of women, homosexuals, pagans, witches, sorcerers, shamans, necromancers, atheists, Christians, and Jews, but also are responsible for the deaths of Muslims (more than any other religion, regime, or hate -group )

They persecute, terrorize, and slaughter the moderate muslims. I have nothing against a Muslim who is for women's rights, against stoning or decapitating people, against amputating limbs or female genital mutilation, against terrorism, against Jihad, against forced dress code, against killing homosexuals , against intolerance toward other faiths, or forcing Religion on people.

Christians who do those things are even more disgusting, because those behaviors are the exact opposite of what Christ repeatedly told people to do and not to do.

But at this time I don't see radical Christians getting control of governments and persecuting everyone that isn't Christian.

However, the problem is not just Islam but radical Monotheism. I see nothing more nauseating in our modern, enlightened world. Yes I have met extremist Christians and it puts toxic chemicles in my bloodstream + makes me want to vomit

I agree with many points mentioned by you in your post. I would say that even Monotheism or belief in one G-d is against "Radicalism":

[17:34] And kill not the soul which Allah has forbidden save for just cause. And whoso is killed wrongfully, We have surely given his heir authority to demand retaliation, but let him not exceed the prescribed bounds in slaying; for therein he is helped by law.
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=17&verse=33

So, the problem is not with Monotheism or ONENESS of G-d, but the problem is only with "Extremism" or the "Radicalism". Right?
Please

Regards

 

[Rick O'Shez]

So, the problem is not with Monotheism or ONENESS of G-d, but the problem is only with "Extremism" or the

Monotheism does seem particularly prone to extremism and radicalism.

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

If wiki says so yes