Er... this criticism doesn't track well if you read his book. To call something a "world religion" doesn't mean it's a monolithic entity without underlying diversity, and nowhere does York suggest that. Not a one of the "world" religions are monolithic; there's huge diversity under labels like "Christianity" and "Hinduism." York makes the case that Paganism (and I mean Paganism, not Neopaganism) can be considered a world religion given its prevalence and influence, even in the modern day. I confess it's been a number of years since I've read it, so I'm not sure how good of a synopsis I could give you. I still recommend anybody interested in Paganism (Neo or otherwise) give it a look if they have the resources to do so.
If you actually see to which direction all the evidence in science is pointing to you will find out that it is actually paganism which is compatible with Modern Science and in fact it might even take over science and one day be more powerful than science.
Its not the end of Gods, its actually the return of Gods.
Spirituality - Jung - Wikipedia
"Jung's work on himself and his patients convinced him that life has a spiritual purpose beyond material goals. Our main task, he believed, is to discover and fulfill our deep innate potential. Based on his study of Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Gnosticism, Taoism, and other traditions, Jung believed that this journey of transformation, which he called individuation,
is at the mystical heart of all religions. It is a journey to meet the self and at the same time to meet the Divine. Unlike Sigmund Freud, Jung thought spiritual experience was essential to our well-being.[35]"
All religions are One. Intellectual people might welcome it but there are some who are just too involved in idolatry and its quite difficult to make them see the truth, the truth which exists in their own religious scriptures.