Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I feel drawn to Druidry, but I can't but help but feel it would be somewhat dishonest to adere to a 'label' so far from my cultural and biological heritage.
If you're a Pagan, what's your opinion on this? Should one's background matter? If so, how much?
I feel drawn to Druidry, but I can't but help but feel it would be somewhat dishonest to adere to a 'label' so far from my cultural and biological heritage.
If you're a Pagan, what's your opinion on this? Should one's background matter? If so, how much?
I feel drawn to Druidry, but I can't but help but feel it would be somewhat dishonest to adere to a 'label' so far from my cultural and biological heritage.
If you're a Pagan, what's your opinion on this? Should one's background matter? If so, how much?
It certainly is a factor in Heathenry, but it's a bit more complicated than fringe.
Folkish Heathens assert that only people who are of Germanic ancestry can hold a true connection to the Gods, as we (Germanic peoples) are made by those Gods. Now, what's often glossed over and or ignored is that they don't actually say that everyone else is wrong. They don't claim superiority, they don't discount other cultures gods as their gods. They are just very "inner-yard", and closed to other peoples. The "Volkisch Heathen" variants, though, are the racists. They're the ones to make claims of superiority, oppression, anti-LGBT, etc. They're the ones who can't play nice with others.
Universalist Heathens believe that anyone and everyone can be Heathen, and no distinction or adherence to cultural practice should be imposed. Want to worship Thor as Zeus? Go right ahead! Want to use red paint to "blood" your runes? It's all the same.
Tribalist Heathens (and I'm not crazy about the name) are somewhere in the middle. This is where I fall. While we do not believe that one must be Germanic to be a Heathen, the culture is very important to us. So no, Thor is not Zeus. No, red paint won't blood your runes with the same energy that actual blood will. Most of us, though, do recognize that people with Germanic ancestry are more likely to be drawn to Heathenry than, say, someone who has Korean heritage. This does not mean they are unwelcomed, though.
So this brings us to heritage. I would argue that to most Pagans - yes, I am assuming a mantle here - heritage is important. It's not a necessity for everyone, but I've even noticed a few Druids who find it a little odd when non-Celtic peoples are interested in Druidry. It's human nature. I believe that while it's not a necessity, it does create some manner of draw for the individual - more often than not. And while our communities and cultures might be inclusive and welcoming, the gods of various cultures might not be; so one's heritage might need to be kept in mind when it comes to that.
it doesn't matter. it's true that many follow the gods of their heritage and that's fine but it's not the rule. worship the gods you like.I feel drawn to Druidry, but I can't but help but feel it would be somewhat dishonest to adhere to a 'label' so far from my cultural and biological heritage.
If you're a Pagan, what's your opinion on this? Should one's background matter? If so, how much?
I feel drawn to Druidry, but I can't but help but feel it would be somewhat dishonest to adhere to a 'label' so far from my cultural and biological heritage.
If you're a Pagan, what's your opinion on this? Should one's background matter? If so, how much?
I will probably get a lot of hate for this post but heritage is very important!!!
Pagans honoring their ancestors with their actions.
If your ancestors were Jewish for example, being a Druid is not honoring them but spitting them in the face.
There is a reason why Paganism is very cultural/native/local.
Uhm, which ancestors is one suppose to honor, how far back?
I can trace maternal ancestors back to pre-Christian times yet more recent ancestors - as in those who came here in the 1600s & 1700s were Anglican, Jewish, and Mennonite. That doesn't begin to cover paternal ancestors who were African slaves and Native Americans with their respective religions.
Family lines are not homogenous even for those whose families were primarily from one continent.
I'm not a pagan, but I deeply considered pagan religions for a while. Heritage seemed to be an important factor to most people I asked when I was trying to find my way here. I'll admit that I still don't understand why that would be the case.
I'm not a pagan, but I deeply considered pagan religions for a while. Heritage seemed to be an important factor to most people I asked when I was trying to find my way here. I'll admit that I still don't understand why that would be the case.
It really depends on who who talk to and what they mean by heritage. Certainly the traditions and practices of a given culture or cultures are likely to be of interest to Pagans. Some, particularly the reconstructionists, feel that it's worthwhile to try and resurrect or rediscover particular stories, rituals and perspectives. In this sense, heritage is important for the same reasons it's important to an archaeologist or anthropologist.
Some people take the above approach and advocate starting with your own ancestry, country or culture before looking elsewhere. This is mostly pragmatic since you're likely to have easier access to resources within your own "home" so to speak.
Next up you have a few people who feel heritage is important so as to not cause offense to a particular group. It's the whole "cultural appropriation" thing. Not going to go into that one.
Then you have the racists. They like to dress it up but they're just racists, plain and simple.
Personally, I favour the eclectic approach. I think there's value in a great many cultures and traditions and often find it difficult to say "Yes, this is the one I will devote my time to from now on." It could happen someday or it may not.
There are bound to be many, many more perspectives on this mind you. Paganism is hardly a unified whole.
Thank you for this explanation. I probably still wouldn't pay much mind to the heritage approach if I were to revisit paganism again. I'm more interested in truth, and I'm not going to accept anything as more valid just because my family's background leads back to it.
Its up to you.
Maternal ancestors does not really matter since historically it was men who was culture bearers.
EDIT: BTW i was talking about culture not genetics but since you brought up blood you got an etno-map.
IPagans that go for Gods that got nothing to do with their ancestral culture look like this to me.