• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Parents want unvaxxed blood transfusion

Select what you agree with:

  • 01 = Dangerous precedent to strip parents rights

  • 02 = Parents should decide

  • 03 = Doctors should decide

  • 04 = Another step to control people

  • 05 = Parents found unvaxxed donor, hence judge is wrong

  • 06 = This clearly is not about baby's health

  • 07 = This clearly is about baby's health

  • 08 = Ruling is to safeguard Covid business

  • 09 = Ruling is related to covid mainstream story

  • 10 = Ruling is unrelated to Covid mainstream story


Results are only viewable after voting.

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Blood transfusions signal to me something potentially life threatening. Which is really the only scenario I can think of that overrules parental consent for medical procedures in general (at least in Oz, as far as I’m aware.)
On a personal level I’d think this is, well wholly dumb and idiotic, to be frank.
Not only is it just paranoid, it goes against decades worth of medical science that we can verify and see for ourselves.
(Your blood isn’t actually altered by vaccines! I learnt that in freaking primary school. Jesus this stuff is beyond basic! So what difference does it make???)
On top of that blood that’s donated is already is short supply since it’s totally voluntary. And on top of that, blood may be rejected due to the strict screening process that’s been in place for decades (due to things like Mad Cow disease.)
So I mean you have to take what you can get, is what I say lol
However, unless it’s a life threatening situation, the parents can refuse if they so choose. I mean JWs famously deny blood transfusions. For themselves and their children and outside of life threatening scenarios(for the kids) that’s their right to do so here
Again, as far as I’m aware.
 
Last edited:

Secret Chief

Very strong language
I was going to vote
"Ruling is to safeguard Covid business"
but then I remembered I'm not a completely paranoid idiot.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I don't care about my babies life just so long as the blood doner has the same politics as me

Sheesh.

So the unvaccinated doner gives their pint of blood. During the op more than a pint is required. Should the doctor stop while another unvaccinated doner is found?

I really don't understand some people
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
I don't care about my babies life just so long as the blood doner has the same politics as me

Sheesh.

So the unvaccinated doner gives their pint of blood. During the op more than a pint is required. Should the doctor stop while another unvaccinated doner is found?

I really don't understand some people

Probably some of the concerns of such people is from reading Alex Jones conspiracy theories. I've heard (obviously not true) conspiracy theories such as "a Covid vaccine puts a live sea creature in your blood", etc.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Probably some of the concerns of such people is from reading Alex Jones conspiracy theories. I've heard (obviously not true) conspiracy theories such as "a Covid vaccine puts a live sea creature in your blood", etc.

You cannot fix stupid unfortunately.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Probably some of the concerns of such people is from reading Alex Jones conspiracy theories. I've heard (obviously not true) conspiracy theories such as "a Covid vaccine puts a live sea creature in your blood", etc.
Wait..seriously? That sounds a parody of Jones
Then again, maybe I shouldn’t be surprised at that.
The man is beyond parody
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Wait..seriously? That sounds a parody of Jones
Then again, maybe I shouldn’t be surprised at that.
The man is beyond parody

I should clarify I'm not for sure this came from Jones directly. But there are microscopic pictures of the virus and some look like a sea creature (they aren't), and people took those pictures and twisted them to say that the vaccine does that.

But it does get weird either way. If I recall, Alex Jones sells black pepper pills on his website.
 
Last edited:

exchemist

Veteran Member
Child of Parents needs operation, and probably blood transfusion

Parents want unvaxxed blood used
And found a donor they have faith in

State (judge) rules against parents

Right or wrong in your opinion?

I am curious what JW think about this: So @nPeace, @Hockeycowboy, @YoursTrue, @Vee,

And @Frank Goad, @Seeker of White Light

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national...inated-donor-blood-case-what-you-need-to-know
These parents are idiots and the health system should have other priorities than to cater to their crazy whims.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Child of Parents needs operation, and probably blood transfusion

Parents want unvaxxed blood used
And found a donor they have faith in

State (judge) rules against parents

Right or wrong in your opinion?

I am curious what JW think about this: So @nPeace, @Hockeycowboy, @YoursTrue, @Vee,

And @Frank Goad, @Seeker of White Light

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national...inated-donor-blood-case-what-you-need-to-know
The parents are wrong and the court should appoint a guardian.

The best interests of the child should prevail over all other concerns. The parents' uninformed views aren't a reason to deny or compromise life-saving treatment for the child.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
State (judge) rules against parents. Right or wrong in your opinion?

That's the correct ruling in my opinion. There are many judgments we don't allow parents to make regarding their children, sometimes removing children from them because of their poor judgment.

We can allow the parents to try to find such a donor and use that blood if available in time, which shouldn't be too difficult for them, but surgery should not be delayed to accommodate unscientific fears that threaten the child's wellbeing.

I didn't choose any of the options. I think courts should decide, and hopefully, they will agree with the physicians.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I don't care about my babies life just so long as the blood doner has the same politics as me

Sheesh.

So the unvaccinated doner gives their pint of blood. During the op more than a pint is required. Should the doctor stop while another unvaccinated doner is found?

I really don't understand some people
The article went into some of the risks with donor-directed blood. The likelihood of a donor lying on their screening questionnaire increases when the donation is directed to a particular person that they know... and when the recipient will know right away if they decline to donate (e.g. if they know their blood would be unsuitable).
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I had already posted this story to the Covid-19 section as per the rules, but it was never approved.

That said, the vast majority of these poll choices are pretty damn dopey.

If parents recklessly and irresponsibly endanger their child, authorities should intervene. How is this even debatable? It's sick that some nutjobs are willing to jeopardize the lives of others over irrational, unsubstantiated, imbecilic conspiracy theories.

If they get their baby back, I hope they don't bottle feed it bleach.
 
Last edited:
Top