Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They couldn't see it in terms of absolute...So, there is no wager....If only he knew.
Christians are always seeking something to be. It always IS.Why? They rejected Aristotle. Christians refused him for Plato.
I believe he knew. It is difficult to picture an intelligent man such as Pascal proposing the Wager seriously.So, there is no wager....If only he knew.
Did they not have sarcasm back then?So you are suggesting that this is renaissaince sarcasm?
i, and j, both have a "tittle". HeheSo you are suggesting that this is renaissaince sarcasm?
*Edit , minus the "i" at the second to the last word.?
So you are suggesting that this is renaissance sarcasm?
Act as if you have faith and faith you shall have.I can't make the wager anyway. I don't believe in any gods, & would have to pretend to believe. An all powerful supreme being type would see thru my ruse.
hahaha I was wondering if you'd chime in.
No, that's ok...only because now, I actually think I understand Pascal. Even though his wager isn't practical.
Wager is an act that should include some consider to the odds.
It's not just you and God.
There are 7+billion copies of a learning device doing just that....learning.
With each breath you become more than you were a moment ago.....and to what end?
No one survives the last breath?
Billions of possible spirit.....and all fail to dust?
I think the odds are GREAT, that a few of us go on.
A supreme being would be fooled by my amateur acting? I don't think so.Act as if you have faith and faith you shall have.
old scripture quote
especially if everything is already "known"....oh, the irony!A supreme being would be fooled by my amateur acting? I don't think so.
Besides, it's possible that a god who makes it's presence undetectable would be offended by humans who made the mistake of having faith in the unknowable.
He started his wager with "God either is, or is not - reason cannot decide between the two alternatives." This doesn't sound to me like the words of someone who considered God's existence an absolute truth.hmmm...really? you think so? I've never thought of that.
do you mean objective truth? do you believe that he thought God was an absolute truth?
A supreme being would be fooled by my amateur acting? I don't think so.
Besides, it's possible that a god who makes it's presence undetectable would be offended by humans who made the mistake of having faith in the unknowable.
If everything's already known, that would eliminate free will. Having no choice in our choices, we shouldn't worry.....except for those who are predestined to worry.especially if everything is already "known"....oh, the irony!
But there "isn't" an " isn't": isn't is nothing, and there is no "no thing".He started his wager with "God either is, or is not - reason cannot decide between the two alternatives." This doesn't sound to me like the words of someone who considered God's existence an absolute truth.