• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pennsylvania Democrats Counting Illegal Ballots

esmith

Veteran Member
Seems that the Democrats are counting illegal ballots and could care less what the law says.
Gee, and some of you are saying that the Republicans are threating democarcy

 

Wirey

Fartist
Seems that the Democrats are counting illegal ballots and could care less what the law says.
Gee, and some of you are saying that the Republicans are threating democarcy

I saw this. Those dudes need some time in a cage.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Seems that the Democrats are counting illegal ballots and could care less what the law says.
Gee, and some of you are saying that the Republicans are threating democarcy

Do you believe that finding some crooked Democrats
means that Republicans are absolved of the attempted
coup in 2020 & 2021?
If you'd merely posted their being caught at voter fraud,
it would be cromulent. But making it about accusations
against Republicans turns it into whataboutism.
 
Last edited:

Alien826

No religious beliefs
From what I see on less biased news outlets, the counting these votes is still subject to a legal decision regarding the constitutionality of the law that says they can't be counted. They have a lower court decision that allows counting them and a stay of execution from the (State) Supreme Court.

So, it will all be settled legally, we just have to wait. In the meantime, I don't see why they can't be counted, so long as a separate total is maintained.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Seems that the Democrats are counting illegal ballots and could care less what the law says.
Gee, and some of you are saying that the Republicans are threating democarcy

People knew all along why the borders were wide open it's intentionally there, so illegals can vote for Democrats. Everybody knew it, and not surprised to see these kind of stories surface.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It was no bipartisan border deal and you know it.
Right....it never happened.
As usual, you evidence is less than convincing.

This must all be "fake news"....
Excerpted...
Republican front-runner Donald Trump said he wants to
be held responsible for blocking a bipartisan border
security bill in the works in the Senate as President Biden
seeks emergency authority to rein in a record surge of
unauthorized border crossings.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Right....it never happened.
As usual, you evidence is less than convincing.

This must all be "fake news"....
Excerpted...
Republican front-runner Donald Trump said he wants to
be held responsible for blocking a bipartisan border
security bill in the works in the Senate as President Biden
seeks emergency authority to rein in a record surge of
unauthorized border crossings.
Hell letting in 5000 day is a record surge. It's not a border bill. It's an amnesty bill.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Your mischievous re-labeling doesn't change
what Trump did to oppose border security.
No, the border bill did not secure the border. That is the issue. It was also not bipartisan. No republican in the senate voted for it and 4 dems voted against it. Letting in an average of 4000/day without doing anything is not security. You are about to see what real border security is.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
People knew all along why the borders were wide open it's intentionally there, so illegals can vote for Democrats. Everybody knew it, and not surprised to see these kind of stories surface.
If people aren't smart enough to vote correctly, maybe they shouldn't vote.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
No, the border bill did not secure the border. That is the issue. It was also not bipartisan. No republican in the senate voted for it and 4 dems voted against it. Letting in an average of 4000/day without doing anything is not security. You are about to see what real border security is.


It was a bipartisan agreement:

Senators released the long-awaited text of a bipartisan agreement to impose tougher immigration and asylum laws Sunday, as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer eyes votes on the package this week.

The $118 billion package includes a series of provisions aimed at reducing record high crossings at the southern border and tightening an asylum system that has been overwhelmed by migrants fleeing their homes to seek refuge. It also includes critical aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan, which Republicans have said they’ll only support if it is paired with significant new U.S. immigration restrictions.

 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Seems that the Democrats are counting illegal ballots and could care less what the law says.
Gee, and some of you are saying that the Republicans are threating democarcy


Well, at least they are sticking to the tactics Republicans have already played that doesn't involve fake electors and rioting at the Capitol. From your Fox article:

Democrats have defended their actions and pointed out that McCormick himself had argued to count contested ballots when he trailed celebrity heart surgeon Dr. Mehmet Oz in the 2022 Republican primary for U.S. Senate.

In that case, McCormick’s lawyer told a state judge that the object of Pennsylvania’s election law is to let people vote, "not to play games of ‘gotcha’ with them."
 
Last edited:

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
BTW, the "Yahoo, News" citation was actually from the Fox, and the Washington Examiner is a "questionable" source to say the least. So, please consider the source.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
BTW, the "Yahoo, News" citation was actually from the Fox, and the Washington Examiner is a "questionable" source to say the least. So, please consider the source.
Yeah, none of the legacy media reported it......wonder why......oh thats right they are in bed with the Democrats.
Here maybe you can accept this, but I doubt it
 
Last edited:
Top