Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sorry, but I'm confused. You are the only one I think goes off on tangents!austheist said:Look, will you please not go off on a tangent? that's not where I am in my argument. If you can't keep with me on a logical level, then I shouldn't even be talking to you. We are at the point where
I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.This applies to God as well.
No, it's a claim to believe in something i can't describe. How is that incoherent?austheist said:If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.
Not go off on a tangent, he wasn't.austheist said:Look, will you please not go off on a tangent? that's not where I am in my argument. If you can't keep with me on a logical level, then I shouldn't even be talking to you. We are at the point where
I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.This applies to God as well.
You didn't say something had to described in order to have a rational belief. You said it had to be described to have a belief.austheist said:Do you see why something must be described in order to have a rational belief in it?
Easily conditional. Does this man know what hell is?austheist said:If you go up to a man who has never heard of God and say, "I believe in God and so you should so you don't go to hell," and he says, "What's God?" What do you tell him? Do you tell him that you don't have to describe to that man what or who God is? He must be described, or we don't know what you are talking about. God means different things to many different religions.
You are NOW. Guess your build up so far has been for nothing, as you're just going to abandon your structure and start making additional claims.austheist said:I am saying you must have a description of something in order to have a RATIONAL belief in it
From the beginning, I said i would tear down the rational belief in Godaustheist said:Look, this was meant as a hoot and a laugh. But, if you want, I will force you to admit your belief in God is irrational.
I'm sorry? were you talking to me??? Well then I apologise for addressing the topic of the thread. I thought someone should, seeing as you seem incapable.austheist said:Look, will you please not go off on a tangent? that's not where I am in my argument. If you can't keep with me on a logical level, then I shouldn't even be talking to you. We are at the point where
I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.This applies to God as well.