• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pink flamingos prove Creationism.

dust1n

Zindīq
It's at times like this when I want to change the subject to cheeses.
Parmesan (old & dry) is still my favorite.

Good thing there's no rare pink cheese to call into question the origins of the universe...

Pink_cheese.jpg


NOOOO!!!
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Once again, you're wrong.
My statement wasn't right.....it wasn't even wrong.

(There's a frubal in it for you if you explain my reference here.)
How about "favorite is subjective", therefore neither intrinsically right or wrong?

Well, we can also look at it another way,namely that even though it is intrinsically neither right or wrong, at least you posted something for once that wasn't wrong. Better? :D
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
How about "favorite is subjective", therefore neither intrinsically right or wrong?

Well, we can also look at it another way,namely that even though it is intrinsically neither right or wrong, at least you posted something for once that wasn't wrong. Better? :D
Tis better.....but you get no frubal for recognizing the paraphrased quote.

Edited for a hint (the exact quote).....
"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It's at times like this when I want to change the subject to cheeses.
Parmesan (old & dry) is still my favorite.
I like cojack. Except when I have it I have to try really hard to not eat it all at once, or even half of it at once.
Swiss is one of my favorites for a sandwich, but it has to be real swiss and not that processed imitation swiss.
American and sharp cheddar are my least favorite. Velveeta I'm not sure about.
Parmesan I only like on pizza, chicken parmesan, or spaghetti, or lasagna. (I wish my mom made a better lasagna, she only uses mozzarella in it)
 

Mohammad Nur Syamsu

Well-Known Member
But, you are arguing with a straw man, as evolution (not materialism) doesn't speak to subjectivity. You merely refuse to recognize what evolution is limited to.

I deal with reality, and the reality is that evolutionists are removing acceptance of the validity of subjectivity. You are making some kind of definition issue, into reality. Despite your definitions it is overwhelmingly clear to me that evolution theory is what stands in the way of creationism, and subjectivity is an inherently creationist concept. Your argument that some theists combine evolution with intelligent design theory, that is just exception. The evolution theory community of scientists, and all the evolution activists, are out to destroy creationism, this is very obvious.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I like cojack. Except when I have it I have to try really hard to not eat it all at once, or even half of it at once.
Swiss is one of my favorites for a sandwich, but it has to be real swiss and not that processed imitation swiss.
American and sharp cheddar are my least favorite. Velveeta I'm not sure about.
Parmesan I only like on pizza, chicken parmesan, or spaghetti, or lasagna. (I wish my mom made a better lasagna, she only uses mozzarella in it)
th


Parmesan on pizza?
Weird.
Try feta.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
You could, but then you'd just be avoiding the issue, much like avoiding my responses so far.

I'm not avoiding the issue. What i'm doing is not limiting the argument to a preset groups of ideas proposed as facts, by which any other evidence presented is then compared to.

No one has addressed the op in any actual manner, btw
 

McBell

Unbound
I'm not avoiding the issue. What i'm doing is not limiting the argument to a preset groups of ideas proposed as facts, by which any other evidence presented is then compared to.

No one has addressed the op in any actual manner, btw
No one has addressed the OP in a manner you like, perhaps, but the OP was shown to be wishful thinking by the second post.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
No one has addressed the OP in a manner you like, perhaps, but the OP was shown to be wishful thinking by the second post.

It wasn't shown to be wishful thinking. That's where your making a mistake. The DIR is addressing Creationism, you still have that to overcome
 

McBell

Unbound
It wasn't shown to be wishful thinking. That's where your making a mistake. The DIR is addressing Creationism, you still have that to overcome
The Op does a really bad job addressing Creationism.
Unless you are merely showing the ridiculousness of Creation "arguments".
 

LegionOnomaMoi

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Oh a few things are in the op, you just didn't notice them, apparently.
I did. I've also written hundreds of posts on this including two recent threads I've started, and you've reduced issues addressed in theoretical physics, cosmology, philosophy, theology, causality, epistemology, probability, and more to the equivalent of "x exists, ergo creationism", insulting and demeaning real anti-creationist arguments even more than failing to address creationist arguments.
 
Top