You seem to be trying to argue semantics. The position of Creationism presented in the OP is an ''example'', of creationism, among others. It's a specific inference to design and plausibility. I did not state anywhere that my entire argument or belief in creationism is based on this OP proposal, or this aspect of the argument. So, you are incorrect in your summary, because it lacks context specificity; ie, it's a false conclusion from the OP, because it speculates beyond which has what been presented as an argument.
Basically, your not presenting an argument, here, because you are misrepresenting the OP intent and specificity.