Wrong, the atheist, agnostic, and theist are all answering the same question, based on their belief...
"I don't know" is a belief you say?
Hence the word "know" is in there, bud.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wrong, the atheist, agnostic, and theist are all answering the same question, based on their belief...
"I don't know" is a belief you say?
Hence the word "know" is in there, bud.
No, they are not. You cannot be, for instance, an "agnostic atheist" as I've noticed some people labeling themselves...this is a contradiction in definition.
Did you even understand the post where I stated that an atheist denies the existence of a deity(ies)? That is neither the position of the theist or the agnostic.
You are arguing a point that you don't even understand, like I said, instead of cluttering up this DIR why don't you go ask for someone to explain this to you in the atheist DIR.
If you do not have a belief either way then you would be in the default position... Someone that would have a belief in a deity would be a theist. Someone who believes there is no deity is a gnostic Atheist. Someone who does not know but is not convinced there is one is an agnostic atheist.(facepalm).
This is unbelivable.
The agnostic is stating that they don't have a belief either way.
You are wrong as to what an Atheist is... It seems you are saying an Atheist believes there is no deity... Which isn't true. You are defining someone that would be considered a gnostic atheist.
An agnostic atheist would say I do not believe in any deity. Not I believer there is no deity. Do you see the difference?
Perhaps you should post in the Atheist DIR if you want this explained to you... you know rather then cluttering up this one.
Some atheists do not seem to be able to understand what "agnostic' means. This isn't my problem.
Perhaps I can explain this another way...
Do you believe that I'm wearing socks right now?
(facepalm).
This is unbelivable.
The agnostic is stating that they don't have a belief either way.
Right and if someone did know the would be a gnostic.From the way I read it, they are saying they don't KNOW either way.
I do not know but the default position would be no until proven...
Right and if someone did know the would be a gnostic.
Do you understand what I mean by default position? A theist believes in a deity. I'm sure you will agree such a thing has not been proven. The burden of proof is on the deists. Anyone who rejects their claims would be considered an Atheist by default.Wrong. There is no "default position" to the question of whether (getting back to the subject) a deity(ies) exist.
You do realize that going by your logic there is no such thing as a "theist", right? Because the "default position" would be the same for them?
Yes that's what Gnostic means, and Agnostic is the (A= Lack of) knowledge
Do you understand what I mean by default position? A theist believes in a deity. I'm sure you will agree such a thing has not been proven. The burden of proof is on the deists. Anyone who rejects their claims would be considered an Atheist by default.
Edit: perhaps this wasn't the best way to explain this. Let me put it this way. Anyone making a claim of any sort is required to prove that claim. The rejection of such claim is the default position.
You are confusing we do not believe in a deity with we believe there is no deity."I don't know" is a valid answer to the question, though, this seems to be what you are having trouble with.
The atheist position/answer as to whether they belive there is a deity(ies) is No. It is a statement to the negative.
"I don't know" is a valid answer to the question, though, this seems to be what you are having trouble with.
The atheist position/answer as to whether they belive there is a deity(ies) is No. It is a statement to the negative.
You are confusing we do not believe in a deity with we believe there is no deity.
Do you understand what I mean by default position? A theist believes in a deity. I'm sure you will agree such a thing has not been proven. The burden of proof is on the deists. Anyone who rejects their claims would be considered an Atheist by default.
No that is not at all what I am saying. I am saying anyone making a claim needs to prove it. Until the claim is proven the default position is the rejection of that claim.Are you saying I have to "prove" that I am an agnostic if that is the label I choose to wear? How do I do that with someone who does not believe in agnostics?
No that is not at all what I am saying. I am saying anyone making a claim needs to prove it. Until the claim is proven the default position is the rejection of that claim.