Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They're going against a Supreme Court ruling. If anyone was to challenge them in court over it, they'd be in a lot of hot water very fast.GeneCosta said:Of course, I don't think anyone should be forced to say the pledge, either. Unfortunately, schools in my area have determined it to be insubordination, which I believe can lead to a child being suspended, expelled, or even arrested.
There's no "could" to it... it is an empty threat. They cannot punish a student for sitting down during the pledge. Even threatening them with action is questionable.GeneCosta said:It could be empty threats. Most of the time there is always someone in my class who doesn't stand, and they're usually threatened by the teacher. I guess if it came down to it the students could get away with it, but being threatened with going to jail sure provokes a kid.
That's not very likely to happen, Alaric. You are talking about Bush here, who think God told him to go to war in Iraq and that God gave him victory. Did God tell him how to win the peace? I think God left that one out.Alaric said:The government and courts can and do handle more than one thing at a time. Eisenhower took the time to put it in, so Bush can take the time to take it out.
I am also an atheist, and I have a serious problem with the "under God" thing. Having these words in the pledge of allegiance implies that atheists are not "good" Americans--that we are not really a legitimate part of this "one nation, under God." (The same is true of the words "In God We Trust" on our money.) Going one step further, why do we need a pledge of allegiance in the first place? It should be assumed that all Americans are loyal to their country, unless they demonstrate otherwise. What does reciting a pledge prove? An American citizen who is plotting to commit terrorist acts against this country would have no problem reciting the pledge. That, and plenty of flag-waving, would only improve his/her patriotic disguise.Mr Spinkles said:Ok, I'm an atheist. I don't believe in God. But even I don't have a problem with the whole "under God" thing.
The Founding Dads? Was the pledge written that long ago?Booko said:As I've said in a similar thread once before, I favor using the pledge our Founding Dads did.
Luke Wolf said:I agree with Painted Wolf. Why pledge to a material symbol that can be burnt, torn, destroyed, and is very weak? Personally, I find the notion of pledging an allegence to a flag to be extremely materialistic and degrading.
Jehovah's Witnesses say that to pledge allegiance to a flag or a republic is idolatrous, and I agree with them completely on that point. Pledges and vows are also directly contrary to the teachings of Jesus. Isn't it interesting that the proponents of including God in the pledge are the people who imagine themselves to be carrying out Jesus' will?RevOxley_501 said:i thoroughly agree with you--i stopped pledging about 6 months before 9-11, havent dont it since--it just feels wrong. So if underGod is taken out, i woudnt care--this nation is not meant to be Christian--so why pretend
MidnightBlue said:Jehovah's Witnesses say that to pledge allegiance to a flag or a republic is idolatrous, and I agree with them completely on that point. Pledges and vows are also directly contrary to the teachings of Jesus. Isn't it interesting that the proponents of including God in the pledge are the people who imagine themselves to be carrying out Jesus' will?
I don't say the pledge for a number of reasons, but if there's to be a pledge, it ought to be, as Booko says, the pledge adopted by our Founding Fathers: none.
Booko said:As I've said in a similar thread once before, I favor using the pledge our Founding Dads did.
Booko said:As I've said in a similar thread once before, I favor using the pledge our Founding Dads did.